Perhaps we should pass a law that outlaws the trampling of our God-given rights... oh never mind, the founders did that already.
Sic semper tyrannis.
Personally, I dont give a flip what the pressitutes from the Gray Media Whore (NYT) have to say, I just hope the lawyers from Gander Mtn. trounce the antis royally. In court, there is no shame in having a battle of wits with the unarmed.
Unfortunately, depending upon where the suit is tried, it's pretty much a slam dunk for the plaintiffs. I would not want to face a jury in New York state when someone wants to gig me regarding guns. Those city folk are scared spitless by the very THOUGHT of a firearm in any hands but the police. I can also imagine the Judge's written directions to the jury giving them virtually no other CHOICE but to convict. I damned well know that's the way it was when the civil jury I was pressed into serving on retired to deliberate. I really believe that the majority of the other jury members figured the same way I did - that the guy did what we would have done in the same situation and we sure weren't negligent in our driving. But there was no wiggle room. So we screwed both sides. We found for the plaintiffs but gave them almost nothing.
Somehow I don't see a bunch of New York yankees doing the same kind of thing. I'm curious as to exactly how the plaintiffs demonstrated standing to sue. Of course with progressives for Judge and plaintiff's attorneys (not to mention the defense) I seriously doubt the issue of standing was ever raised. Or if it was the judge made it clear that the lawsuit was going to go forward NO MATTER WHAT! {BANG}
The selling FFL files a multiple purchase form with the atf and fbi any time a person purchases 2 or more handguns (and now rifles in "border states")
None of these transactions are done in secret.........(except the secret being kept from the buyer that these reports are being made) and NICS 48 hour record "destruction" is done by the tooth fairy
"Our main agenda is to have all guns banned. We must use whatever means possible. It doesn't matter if you have to distort the facts or even lie. Our task of creating a socialist America can only succeed when those who would resist us have been totally disarmed."
Sara Brady quote Chairman, Handgun Control Inc, (aka, "The Brady Center)",to Senator Howard Metzenbaum The National Educator, January 1994, Page 3.
7 comments:
So, when was the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act repealed?
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/7901
Any excuse, however flimsy, will be exploited by the antis.
Merle
Perhaps we should pass a law that outlaws the trampling of our God-given rights... oh never mind, the founders did that already.
Sic semper tyrannis.
Personally, I dont give a flip what the pressitutes from the Gray Media Whore (NYT) have to say, I just hope the lawyers from Gander Mtn. trounce the antis royally. In court, there is no shame in having a battle of wits with the unarmed.
Unfortunately, depending upon where the suit is tried, it's pretty much a slam dunk for the plaintiffs. I would not want to face a jury in New York state when someone wants to gig me regarding guns. Those city folk are scared spitless by the very THOUGHT of a firearm in any hands but the police. I can also imagine the Judge's written directions to the jury giving them virtually no other CHOICE but to convict. I damned well know that's the way it was when the civil jury I was pressed into serving on retired to deliberate. I really believe that the majority of the other jury members figured the same way I did - that the guy did what we would have done in the same situation and we sure weren't negligent in our driving. But there was no wiggle room. So we screwed both sides. We found for the plaintiffs but gave them almost nothing.
Somehow I don't see a bunch of New York yankees doing the same kind of thing. I'm curious as to exactly how the plaintiffs demonstrated standing to sue. Of course with progressives for Judge and plaintiff's attorneys (not to mention the defense) I seriously doubt the issue of standing was ever raised. Or if it was the judge made it clear that the lawsuit was going to go forward NO MATTER WHAT! {BANG}
The selling FFL files a multiple purchase form with the atf and fbi any time a person purchases 2 or more handguns (and now rifles in "border states")
None of these transactions are done in secret.........(except the secret being kept from the buyer that these reports are being made) and NICS 48 hour record "destruction" is done by the tooth fairy
Fight islam Now
"Our main agenda is to have all guns banned. We must use whatever means possible. It doesn't matter if you have to distort the facts or even lie. Our task of creating a socialist America can only succeed when those who would resist us have been totally disarmed."
Sara Brady quote
Chairman, Handgun Control Inc, (aka, "The Brady Center)",to Senator Howard Metzenbaum
The National Educator, January 1994, Page 3.
Please see, google "Reese family FAST & FURIOUS scapegoat?" same crap, now into year 4...court is a benefit to atty's and newspapers.
Post a Comment