Sipsey Street Irregulars: Kissy, kissy. Collectivist rag that endorsed I-594 lauds Gottlieb for denouncing anti-594 "extremists." (And Gottlieb's proud of it.)

Wednesday, January 21, 2015

Kissy, kissy. Collectivist rag that endorsed I-594 lauds Gottlieb for denouncing anti-594 "extremists." (And Gottlieb's proud of it.)

Gottlieb and Workman, cheek to cheek and playing kissy, kissy with collectivist propaganda outlets.

Well, it looks like, a. Dr. Gottlieb and his trusty lab assistant Igor Workman are determined to prove every one of my criticisms; and, b., that they are so desperate for positive publicity that they have no problem unselfconsciously trumpeting the praises of a collectivist rag like the Vancouver Columbian -- "Earth shaking: Newspaper editorial lauds gun rights leader." Mind you, this is a paper that ENDORSED I-594!

6 comments:

Brian Morton said...: My reply in Workman's hit piece waiting for his approval to publish.

http://www.columbian.com/news/2014/oct/15/background-checks-yes/

Oh look, Workman, Gotlieb et al have something in common with the progressive left. Yeah we already knew that. I warned them at the onset of I-591 that those attempts would create the divide amongst gun owners and their narcissistic reply, "It's my right to do so." So no, the compromising "pro gun" groups cannot blame others for division. There are no fence sitters. Those that do not support the 2nd A just never will. But now the grabbers and SAF have a common enemy and both use the collectivist's "extremist's" language. Now isn't that interesting? Huh. Brandishing...same same. Guess those old boy on Lexington Green and on Punkatasset Hill on April 19, 1775 were brandishing. You folks have lost so much, and are clamoring to lose more. Sad.; January 21, 2015 at 10:15 PM
PO'd American said...: Dr. Evil and MiniMe...oh wait, he's not so mini, but he is evil.; January 22, 2015 at 6:53 AM
Anonymous said...: For those of you who are out of state that didn't get to read I591 which Gottlieb and his lap dog Workman were promoting in Washington State in their attempt in reality to pass I594, I591 allowed for background checks but by giving up our states rights to the feds.

Gottlieb and his lackey Workman and now Bob Owens (who I once admired, he does have a right to his opinion but if he is for taking my rights away we are now not on the same side) are all for universal backgrounds checks on the federal level.

So my question to any and all of them, do we have a natural right to defend ourselves and is that right protected by the 2nd amendment?

If their answer is yes, then my next question would be; why should we the law abiding have to bow down to government for a background check to maintain that right?

Death before slavery!

Comrade X; January 22, 2015 at 1:39 PM
Anonymous said...: People need to wake up;

Bloomberg calls us extremist/Gottlieb calls us extremist!

Bloomberg wants background checks/Gottlieb wants background checks!

Bloomberg spends millions/Gottlieb takes in millions!

Does anyone else see a pattern here besides me?; January 22, 2015 at 4:53 PM
Anonymous said...: They kinda look like Sponge Bob and Patrick Star to me!; January 22, 2015 at 5:04 PM
Anonymous said...: Wondered where Workman's bow tie was ... till I looked up and saw the NRA hat ... nuff said.

III; January 22, 2015 at 9:01 PM

"Progress made under the shadow of the policeman's club is false progress."

I believe that liberty is the only genuinely valuable thing that men have invented, at least in the field of government, in a thousand years. I believe that it is better to be free than to be not free, even when the former is dangerous and the latter safe. I believe that the finest qualities of man can flourish only in free air – that progress made under the shadow of the policeman's club is false progress, and of no permanent value. I believe that any man who takes the liberty of another into his keeping is bound to become a tyrant, and that any man who yields up his liberty, in however slight the measure, is bound to become a slave. -- H.L. Mencken

"The Fate of Unborn Millions. . ."

"The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves; whether they are to have any property they can call their own; whether their Houses, and Farms, are to be pillaged and destroyed, and they consigned to a State of Wretchedness from which no human efforts will probably deliver them. The fate of unborn Millions will now depend, under God, on the Courage and Conduct of this army-Our cruel and unrelenting Enemy leaves us no choice but a brave resistance, or the most abject submission; that is all we can expect-We have therefore to resolve to conquer or die." -- George Washington to his troops before the Battle of Long Island.

"We will not go gently . . ."

This is no small thing, to restore a republic after it has fallen into corruption. I have studied history for years and I cannot recall it ever happening. It may be that our task is impossible. Yet, if we do not try then how will we know it can't be done? And if we do not try, it most certainly won't be done. The Founders' Republic, and the larger war for western civilization, will be lost.

But I tell you this: We will not go gently into that bloody collectivist good night. Indeed, we will make with our defiance such a sound as ALL history from that day forward will be forced to note, even if they despise us in the writing of it.

And when we are gone, the scattered, free survivors hiding in the ruins of our once-great republic will sing of our deeds in forbidden songs, tending the flickering flame of individual liberty until it bursts forth again, as it must, generations later. We will live forever, like the Spartans at Thermopylae, in sacred memory.

-- Mike Vanderboegh, The Lessons of Mumbai:Death Cults, the "Socialism of Imbeciles" and Refusing to Submit, 1 December 2008

"A common language of resistance . . ."

"Colonial rebellions throughout the modern world have been acts of shared political imagination. Unless unhappy people develop the capacity to trust other unhappy people, protest remains a local affair easily silenced by traditional authority. Usually, however, a moment arrives when large numbers of men and women realize for the first time that they enjoy the support of strangers, ordinary people much like themselves who happen to live in distant places and whom under normal circumstances they would never meet. It is an intoxicating discovery. A common language of resistance suddenly opens to those who are most vulnerable to painful retribution the possibility of creating a new community. As the conviction of solidarity grows, parochial issues and aspirations merge imperceptibly with a compelling national agenda which only a short time before may have been the dream of only a few. For many Americans colonists this moment occurred late in the spring of 1774." -- T.H. Breen, The Marketplace of Revolution: How Consumer Politics Shaped American Independence, Oxford University Press, 2004, p.1.

Sipsey Street Irregulars

Wednesday, January 21, 2015

Kissy, kissy. Collectivist rag that endorsed I-594 lauds Gottlieb for denouncing anti-594 "extremists." (And Gottlieb's proud of it.)

6 comments:

Blog Archive

Followers