Sipsey Street Irregulars: Keystone "coppos." A critique from an anonymous historical illiterate.

Friday, January 23, 2015

Keystone "coppos." A critique from an anonymous historical illiterate.

From a comment on the post below:

After reading your blog for years and hearing you speak. It is impossible to take your warnings seriously as your only goal seems to be getting your face into the public eye. If anyone actually moved to violently oppose this treason you would be the first to betray and denounce them. You are what they called in the camps a COPPO. I have come to believe that in many ways you are more dangerous to Liberty than Bloomberg, as he at least is truthful in his loyalty to tyranny. You on the other hand , have consistently worked to support and defend the state for as long as I can discover your history. You have done more over the last 40+ years to undermine the freedom and liberty of the American people, the militia and the III% than any man since B. Arnold. Soon you will die, and may G_D have mercy on you, as history will not.

Well, I suppose that depends upon who writes the history. And by the way, my brave historical illiterate, the word is "kapo" not "coppo." It is useful to be able to correctly spell things when you're trying to get someone to take you seriously. My suggestion to you is that if reading my blog is such a waste, then don't do it. You'll feel better about yourself, perhaps enough so that one day you'll be able to use your real name without embarrassment. As for God's judgment, I will accept it without complaint.

9 comments:

PO'd American said...: I think we can narrow this down....Anonymous is not Italian.; January 23, 2015 at 10:20 AM
Anonymous said...: Mike,

It would be interesting to see the metrics associated with the anonymous comments. You know for a fact that nothing done on the Internet is truly "anonymous". I would venture to say that the "COPPOS" error is an intentional misdirection, too obvious to be anything but. It would be analogous to a commenter typing "HOLICOST". I know there are stupid people, but, unless you corrected anon's other spelling, there weren't any other mistakes. The poster also uses the g underscore d which is a practice of Jewish law. My guess is that this "anonymous" is someone whom you know or have communicated with in the past.
HinMO; January 23, 2015 at 10:34 AM
Anonymous said...: Looks like you'll getting under Gottlieb & Workman's & their minions skins a little!

Keep it up, the more you stick a pig the more they're gonna squeal!; January 23, 2015 at 10:40 AM
Loog Moog said...: I always take with a grain of salt any post by this guy who calls himself "Anonymous". This guy often posts more than one post in a given thread. I would support banning him or at least limiting him to one post per thread.
/sarcasm/.
Seriously, folks, would it KILL you to post your thoughts with SOME unique identifing mark ? Of course, those who spew hate at the owners and loyal readers of this blog are too cowardly to put their identity on their posts.; January 23, 2015 at 6:03 PM
Anonymous said...: This sounds like one of Carrot top's minions.; January 23, 2015 at 8:08 PM
Loog Moog said...: At least Carrot Top has a point...; January 23, 2015 at 11:07 PM
TRex said...: The one thing that I think would be good coming out of all this is maybe you could have an index of links to some of your other really important posts to add to your Catechism.

Other than that, you pretty much explained what your anonymous detractor missed, had he only read your Catechism and understood the history surrounding it.

One element, for instance:
"Don't fire unless fired upon." -- Captain John Parker, Lexington Minutemen, 19 April 1775.
if your anonymous detractor knew the history of that remark, it was soon followed by an exchange of gunfire "heard around the world"

Maybe that was on the minds of the BLM enforcers out in Nevada last year. Or maybe they had read the first chapter of "Absolved."

Keep up the good work.; January 24, 2015 at 8:17 AM
Anonymous said...: Mike has been consistent in saying that the other side needs to fire the first shots. I do wonder which police shooting will constitute the "first shot" event? Perhaps some clarification on that would be nice. It most likely will be a SWAT raid on a weapons charge in a restrictive state , and the gun owner will be described as a " violent extremist" by the media.; January 24, 2015 at 8:34 AM
TRex said...: If you have followed him, and understand the opening chapter of Absolved, you will realize "shots" means several of us will have to perish first. We must maintain the moral high ground, and that will be at a cost.

I have been trying to create an index of some of his most important articles (without much success), but one I remember basically said when the most visible 2nd Amendment supporters get rounded up, wholesale, then it will be time to start shooting all of the politicians, but not before.

If this is too hard for some, well then, so be it. Find something else to do.; January 24, 2015 at 10:44 AM

"Progress made under the shadow of the policeman's club is false progress."

I believe that liberty is the only genuinely valuable thing that men have invented, at least in the field of government, in a thousand years. I believe that it is better to be free than to be not free, even when the former is dangerous and the latter safe. I believe that the finest qualities of man can flourish only in free air – that progress made under the shadow of the policeman's club is false progress, and of no permanent value. I believe that any man who takes the liberty of another into his keeping is bound to become a tyrant, and that any man who yields up his liberty, in however slight the measure, is bound to become a slave. -- H.L. Mencken

"The Fate of Unborn Millions. . ."

"The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves; whether they are to have any property they can call their own; whether their Houses, and Farms, are to be pillaged and destroyed, and they consigned to a State of Wretchedness from which no human efforts will probably deliver them. The fate of unborn Millions will now depend, under God, on the Courage and Conduct of this army-Our cruel and unrelenting Enemy leaves us no choice but a brave resistance, or the most abject submission; that is all we can expect-We have therefore to resolve to conquer or die." -- George Washington to his troops before the Battle of Long Island.

"We will not go gently . . ."

This is no small thing, to restore a republic after it has fallen into corruption. I have studied history for years and I cannot recall it ever happening. It may be that our task is impossible. Yet, if we do not try then how will we know it can't be done? And if we do not try, it most certainly won't be done. The Founders' Republic, and the larger war for western civilization, will be lost.

But I tell you this: We will not go gently into that bloody collectivist good night. Indeed, we will make with our defiance such a sound as ALL history from that day forward will be forced to note, even if they despise us in the writing of it.

And when we are gone, the scattered, free survivors hiding in the ruins of our once-great republic will sing of our deeds in forbidden songs, tending the flickering flame of individual liberty until it bursts forth again, as it must, generations later. We will live forever, like the Spartans at Thermopylae, in sacred memory.

-- Mike Vanderboegh, The Lessons of Mumbai:Death Cults, the "Socialism of Imbeciles" and Refusing to Submit, 1 December 2008

"A common language of resistance . . ."

"Colonial rebellions throughout the modern world have been acts of shared political imagination. Unless unhappy people develop the capacity to trust other unhappy people, protest remains a local affair easily silenced by traditional authority. Usually, however, a moment arrives when large numbers of men and women realize for the first time that they enjoy the support of strangers, ordinary people much like themselves who happen to live in distant places and whom under normal circumstances they would never meet. It is an intoxicating discovery. A common language of resistance suddenly opens to those who are most vulnerable to painful retribution the possibility of creating a new community. As the conviction of solidarity grows, parochial issues and aspirations merge imperceptibly with a compelling national agenda which only a short time before may have been the dream of only a few. For many Americans colonists this moment occurred late in the spring of 1774." -- T.H. Breen, The Marketplace of Revolution: How Consumer Politics Shaped American Independence, Oxford University Press, 2004, p.1.

Sipsey Street Irregulars

Friday, January 23, 2015

Keystone "coppos." A critique from an anonymous historical illiterate.

9 comments:

Blog Archive

Followers