Sipsey Street Irregulars: "For him to say that he thinks that he can take our rights away is to say that he's God, and until he gets promoted as some sort of divinity, he doesn't have that right."

Thursday, November 21, 2013

"For him to say that he thinks that he can take our rights away is to say that he's God, and until he gets promoted as some sort of divinity, he doesn't have that right."

NY Gun Rights Activists: Gov. Cuomo is "Not God"

New York Governor Andrew Cuomo’s popularity is on the same track as the president’s. With 56 percent of voters giving Cuomo a negative job approval rating, according to a Siena College poll, which is eight percentage points down from October, he’s having a hard time finding friends these days. Much of the disenchantment, it seems, is due to his push for gun control and the controversial SAFE Act Cuomo hurried into law in January after the tragedy at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut.

Okay, so he's certainly not God. A pagan demi-god, maybe? Just when he looks in the mirror?

4 comments:

Anonymous said...: Really, rights inherent, fundamentally, as a result of our Creation cannot be stolen away. Truly speaking, they are ceded by a people one by one on the individual level.

Legislatures cannot abridge or infringe exercise by any means outside Constitutional Amendment. Judiciaries cannot, certainly cannot, amend the Constitution themselves. Executives cannot exercise a kingship of sorts and ban exercise by decree. Seriously, all they can do is LIE about having authorities they DO NOT HAVE in an effort to convince the weak minded that they have no choice, no liberty, of their own but that they must simply do as they are told.

Today, all money, whether it be through advocacy groups or political campaigns, ends up in the hands of a television based media that perpetrates the "democratic society" LIE. This LIE indoctrinated people into buying the garbage that individual rights are somehow open to the will of the majority vote.

Unchecked majority vote authority is what LED to race based slavery. Checking that authority. With a government if republican form, is what freed us of that scourge. Today, the sway back to it threatens economic based slavery.

It has taken almost a century and a half for a courts usurpation to manifest the truth. "Commerce clause precedent " read and "interpreted " the way SCOTUS did renders literally EVERY protection enumerated as MOOT. For if their is no PRIVATE two party contract absent government injecting itself as a third party, there can be no individual liberty whatsoever. But wait?

Can there be? In spite of their "ruling "?

Can you say "smuggle"?

Many so called conservative decry "gangs".
Freedom to assemble and associate?
They decry gangs and guns. Oh and drugs.
They FAIL to see that there is a RIGHT being exercised on all three accounts and that GOVERNMENT MEDDLING is the problem.

It's quite arguable that the "gangs" are far more free than the rest of the population. Kind of like smuggling, they are throwing off the unjust governance that attempts to violate their RIGHTS.

So called law abiding conservative are the real jailers. They are the real hypocrites. They are the real "rights for me but not for thee " folks. They are the FIRST to ignore rights altogether when "gangs" is touted but then slam "assault weapon " usage. A buzzword is a buzzword is a buzzword!

The ONLY way it works, folks, is if EVERYONE has the SAME rights - no exceptions. No permission slips. No qualification schemes. No mental defectives or felony or sensitive places or "ordered liberty" renditions. No time place manner Trojan horses.

What "gang" members are doing is telling government to piss off. They are saying "we are freedmen and we are gonna act like it in spite of your threats of retaliation if we do so ". And so called conservatives screech about individual liberty while they call for more "crackdown " on. "Gangs ". They call themselves "law abiding" as a rationalization to make their hypocrisy butt hurt feel better. The only thing they are conserving is their own envisioned title of nobility. Law abiding ???
Uh huh. Riiiiiight.

Seems to me it's gangs doing the abiding by the Suoreme Law while the "law abiders" are really just too scared to hold firm on that Supreme law and instead willingly cede their own rights to the biggest bully of them all - government.

In order for our constitution to match our Constitition, We the People have to ACT it out in practice. Far too many sheepishly stand down their own rights under the guise of "law abiding". While real and true Patriots ummmm "smuggle", assemble in "Gangs " and do things like dare exercise the right to bear arms even if government claims doing so is a felony offense.

The fake talk about rights. The Patriots exercise them.; November 21, 2013 at 9:59 AM
ATOM ANT said...: Just like as you get older, every women eventually becomes a 10.

The longer you are a politician the more you believe you're god.; November 21, 2013 at 2:03 PM
Anonymous said...: Well said Anon @ 9:59AM; November 21, 2013 at 2:31 PM
ag42b said...: Comment #1 is so good it should be archived. I know I am saving a copy. I could never have defined freedom better.; November 21, 2013 at 7:30 PM

"Progress made under the shadow of the policeman's club is false progress."

I believe that liberty is the only genuinely valuable thing that men have invented, at least in the field of government, in a thousand years. I believe that it is better to be free than to be not free, even when the former is dangerous and the latter safe. I believe that the finest qualities of man can flourish only in free air – that progress made under the shadow of the policeman's club is false progress, and of no permanent value. I believe that any man who takes the liberty of another into his keeping is bound to become a tyrant, and that any man who yields up his liberty, in however slight the measure, is bound to become a slave. -- H.L. Mencken

"The Fate of Unborn Millions. . ."

"The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves; whether they are to have any property they can call their own; whether their Houses, and Farms, are to be pillaged and destroyed, and they consigned to a State of Wretchedness from which no human efforts will probably deliver them. The fate of unborn Millions will now depend, under God, on the Courage and Conduct of this army-Our cruel and unrelenting Enemy leaves us no choice but a brave resistance, or the most abject submission; that is all we can expect-We have therefore to resolve to conquer or die." -- George Washington to his troops before the Battle of Long Island.

"We will not go gently . . ."

This is no small thing, to restore a republic after it has fallen into corruption. I have studied history for years and I cannot recall it ever happening. It may be that our task is impossible. Yet, if we do not try then how will we know it can't be done? And if we do not try, it most certainly won't be done. The Founders' Republic, and the larger war for western civilization, will be lost.

But I tell you this: We will not go gently into that bloody collectivist good night. Indeed, we will make with our defiance such a sound as ALL history from that day forward will be forced to note, even if they despise us in the writing of it.

And when we are gone, the scattered, free survivors hiding in the ruins of our once-great republic will sing of our deeds in forbidden songs, tending the flickering flame of individual liberty until it bursts forth again, as it must, generations later. We will live forever, like the Spartans at Thermopylae, in sacred memory.

-- Mike Vanderboegh, The Lessons of Mumbai:Death Cults, the "Socialism of Imbeciles" and Refusing to Submit, 1 December 2008

"A common language of resistance . . ."

"Colonial rebellions throughout the modern world have been acts of shared political imagination. Unless unhappy people develop the capacity to trust other unhappy people, protest remains a local affair easily silenced by traditional authority. Usually, however, a moment arrives when large numbers of men and women realize for the first time that they enjoy the support of strangers, ordinary people much like themselves who happen to live in distant places and whom under normal circumstances they would never meet. It is an intoxicating discovery. A common language of resistance suddenly opens to those who are most vulnerable to painful retribution the possibility of creating a new community. As the conviction of solidarity grows, parochial issues and aspirations merge imperceptibly with a compelling national agenda which only a short time before may have been the dream of only a few. For many Americans colonists this moment occurred late in the spring of 1774." -- T.H. Breen, The Marketplace of Revolution: How Consumer Politics Shaped American Independence, Oxford University Press, 2004, p.1.

Sipsey Street Irregulars

Thursday, November 21, 2013

"For him to say that he thinks that he can take our rights away is to say that he's God, and until he gets promoted as some sort of divinity, he doesn't have that right."

4 comments:

Blog Archive

Followers