Remember, people, it would NOT require 67 votes in the Senate to ratify this abomination. From the U.S. Constitution Article II, Section 2 "[The President] shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur;"
Notice the wording of the article. It does not require 2/3rds of the Senators to concur, but merely 2/3rds of the of the Senators PRESENT. HUGE DIFFERENCE!!!!! If Reid sent the Senate home for recess but did not actually put the Senate into recess (something they do all the time to limit recess appointments) and a few Senators hadn't left yet and 2/3rds of THEM voted to ratify, then it would be a fait accompli.
Remember, there are lots of ways to skin a cat and they're all fun. Except to the cat. ;)
My worry about this is not the treaty itself, but the fact that Obama could easily use it as cover to issue Executive Orders. Such orders could ban the importation of ammunition, ammo components, magazines and guns. He needs no Congressional approval - the '68 GCA gives him that authority. All he has to do is say, "In the spirit of this proposed treaty, and to fulfill my promise of doing something about the indiscriminate violence on our streets, I am banning the importation of weapons of war and their deadly ammunition. Folks, we have enough here already, we don't need more on the streets."
Oh, and the resultant furor would drive at least a couple of his scandals off of the front page. It is a win/win situation for him.
9 comments:
His signing will mean nothing. If he signs it and the Senate approves by a 2/3's majority, it means nothing to me, as I will ignore it.
Tyrantosaurus Rex!
The wheels od the Tumbrils are echoing on the cobblestones ...
Extiction approaches apace.
III
FANfuckinTASTIC
Remember, people, it would NOT require 67 votes in the Senate to ratify this abomination. From the U.S. Constitution Article II, Section 2 "[The President] shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur;"
Notice the wording of the article. It does not require 2/3rds of the Senators to concur, but merely 2/3rds of the of the Senators PRESENT. HUGE DIFFERENCE!!!!! If Reid sent the Senate home for recess but did not actually put the Senate into recess (something they do all the time to limit recess appointments) and a few Senators hadn't left yet and 2/3rds of THEM voted to ratify, then it would be a fait accompli.
Remember, there are lots of ways to skin a cat and they're all fun. Except to the cat. ;)
Treaty dont mean nothin to me, im not a government.
I have no army, navy..etc..
I am my own man and I wouldnt pay any attention to it even if it did apply to me any dam way
jokes on them, as usual
besides..no treaty superceeds my 2nd amendment right so they can just stick that in Obamies crack pipe and smoke it
He'll be signing a declaration of war against the American people...and he wont win, nor survive.
Fuck him , and his treaty .
WHAT TRAITORS SIGN MATTERS NOT
My worry about this is not the treaty itself, but the fact that Obama could easily use it as cover to issue Executive Orders. Such orders could ban the importation of ammunition, ammo components, magazines and guns. He needs no Congressional approval - the '68 GCA gives him that authority. All he has to do is say, "In the spirit of this proposed treaty, and to fulfill my promise of doing something about the indiscriminate violence on our streets, I am banning the importation of weapons of war and their deadly ammunition. Folks, we have enough here already, we don't need more on the streets."
Oh, and the resultant furor would drive at least a couple of his scandals off of the front page. It is a win/win situation for him.
Post a Comment