Wednesday, November 19, 2014

So, should we pity the poor unionized gunmakers whose labor bosses gave millions to elect gun controllers over the years?

Remington CEO: New York’s anti-gun policies drove us to Alabama

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

No pity. Remington did the right thing moving to a right to work state. Organized Labor is an idea first promoted by Karl Marx in the Communist Manifesto.

Anonymous said...

Never liked Remington anyway.

oughtsix said...


Pity?

No.

Reach out with a big "We TOLD you so!" ?

Yes.

Happy D said...

No we should not.
Though helping them move might be in everyone's interest.

Dúnadan said...

Did somebody say 'assault gun'?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_gun

I had no idea Remington built those!

Paul X said...

Voting with their feet, exactly what people should do.

Anonymous said...

Hasty decisions often have severe consequences . While I wouldn't expect any card-carrying member of the politician's union to ever, ever acknowledge they erred, perhaps its time the electorate took all of them- regardless of party affiliation- to the woodshed. >Jeff

Anonymous said...

Being the wife of an IBEW Local 3 member, I once had to spend 20 minutes at a function explaining to other members that the people the union tells them to vote for work AGAINST them and FOR the suits running their union. Whether I got through to them or not - I don't know. But this election cycle they were still being told to vote Democrat and we all seen how that turned out. And the ONLY union I seen rallying with us against the un-SAFE Act in Albany last year was United Mine Workers. But then, they know the importance of having a gun when company thugs come with military to burn your camp down and murder women and children.

FedUp said...

In other gunmaker news, Photography Is Not A Crime notices the ARES Armor ATF raid, and its owner's 1A lawsuit against Sheriff Ruby Ridge:

http://photographyisnotacrime.com/2014/11/san-diego-sheriff-removes-facebook-page/