Trouble for Malloy in CT? Don't bet on it, but his real trouble will be coming in late October and I intend to deliver it.
Dannel Malloy Holiday Camp for Recalcitrant Connecticut Firearm Owners, opening soon (right after he gets re-elected).
Poll gives Foley 9-point edge over Malloy
Accurate or not, this poll which appeared two days ago was enough to scare Malloy into running onto the set of Morning Joe on MSNBC yesterday for a quick and free campaign commercial from Mika B.
What I hear is that Malloy has issued whispered, oh-so-quiet orders not have any enforcement of the Intolerable Act until after his re-election. After that, however, he will turn KGB Lawlor loose to wreak havoc. Voters in CT should be reminded forcefully that a vote for Malloy is a vote for the arrest and possible death of their friends and neighbors. Lord willing, I intend to go to CT just before the election in the last week of October to make that point. I will be in CO the week before that to do the same thing to Hickenlooper. I was asked while I was out in Colorado why I couldn't reverse the order and do that state after Connecticut. I replied, "because I'm pretty sure I'll survive Colorado but I don't expect to get out of Connecticut unscathed." Lawlor is said to have expressed a heart-felt wish for my demise. I'm going to give him and his bully boys in the Connecticut State Police the chance. The only question is, will Malloy like that image fresh in the voters' minds going into the voting booths? Keep me in your prayers.
14 comments:
your typical MSNBC viewer would probably vote for him anyway, but considering their viewership gets smaller by the day i think he's going to have a bit of trouble...BTW: I'm in upstate NY and when you travel to Conn. I and perhaps a couple of other locals up here would like to stand with you at your gathering..
It will take real balls for any police to enforce this. Generally speaking, if you kill the wrong man's son, if you are lucky the man may commit suicide out of sheer despair, or may go beserek... Fear the man with nothing to lose. Like the Joker, that man cannot be bartered with, reasoned with, etc.
Mike, you have to get on the local TV news media for interviews just before those elections. I imagine you already plan to do that, though. It would also help if you could get on FOXNEWS CHANNEL for interviews as well. That would also be seen nationwide. One way to do that might be to get a local FOX channel to interview you. It could get picked up by the national network.
- Old Greybeard
Remember Mike," if GOD be with us, who can be against us"? He IS with you, so why worry?
Sir, your unmentionables are as massive as pulsars. I hope - no, I pray - that the evil bastards aren't so galactically stupid as to try to "deal with" you.
This is what we are dealing with.
I took a Hillsdale online course on Constitution.
Quoted from Hillsdale very much sums up the issue.
In the early 20th century, a new political theory—known as Progressivism—rose to prominence in America. This theory held that the principles of the American Founding, expressed most eloquently and concisely in the Declaration of Independence, were irrelevant to modern life. Progressives taught that stringent restrictions on government power were no longer necessary to protect liberty, since human nature and science had advanced greatly during the 19th century. Progressives did not believe that individuals are endowed with inalienable rights by a Creator; rather, they believed that rights are determined by social expediency and bestowed by the government. In conjunction with this new theory of rights, Progressivism holds that government must be able to adapt to ever-changing historical circumstances.
You can count on some Rhode Islanders being with your CT group.
So far we have been able to physically stare down the Quislings at the state house.
What we all need is for people to get off their asses,participate and to find good candidates to fill our elected offices.
We in CT welcome you and will enjoy your visit knowing that it will get Danny's sphincter twitching.
Do you think that Lawler can afford the number of heads covered by each individual participant of the 100 Heads Inurance policy?
A contingent from Western New York will be there in support. We have our own problems with the Mussolini of Manhattan and support our friend in Conn.!
III
So ummm, why aren't "moms " ummm "targeting" Ct? Why aren't Bloomies peeps out demanding enforcement of their wet dream ban?
Mike, a request for an answer by you and an article to go along with it will REALLT spin them up. Heck, Rachel might be a good one to ask and you know she lives mails from you. Hey even Alan!
I'm sorry, Dutchman, but I don't think the rank and file Conn. resident fives a fig for his/her neighbor. I strongly suspect that most of them are 2-time Obama voters who believe that the State can do no wrong; law and order uber alles. Obama voters will figure that the resistors knew what they were doing when they reused to follow the law initially and therefor deserve whatever happens to them.
The question will then be for the rest of them to answer. Will they actually start an insurrection, or will the majority meekly turn themselves in? I wouldn't put it past the bastards to offer some sort of faux amnesty to avoid trouble.
I see two possible outcomes of slipping Lawlor's lead. Either the vast majority will "come to their senses" (knuckle under) and take whatever is offered them or an insurrection will start. In the latter case, if Conn. authorities can't get a handle on things damned quick, Obama will happily declare a state of emergency and impose martial law. At that point we will be in a civil war whether or not the lapdog media report it or not. I would expect one of the first actions would be to confiscate all privately owned firearms - just for the duration of the emergency.
I would have to observe that in the (unlikely??) event something happened to you with traveling as a free American in America, all hell would break loose.
BadCyborg, your analysis may be true in hartford, new haven, and fairfield county, but the areas such as Litchfield County and other rural areas lean more "red" than blue.
Do not write us CT folks off.
Post a Comment