Hey Mike..... It's a Freedom thing. Us refusing to be disarmed. The LIBERALS just don't understand.... They will call for us when they are herded into camps......
I find it hi-larious that they think that the armed services would side with them in a conflict. Do they not know where the demographics that make up the 5 branches come from? Not so many come from Liberaland. More than a few come from flyover territory.
I would point out that they had not thought this through, but that would be stating the obvious on just about every facet of their miserable, unfulfilled and hateful lives. I guess that policy of shitting on the military for the past 40 years had a couple of unintended consequences, huh?
Wow, I ventured into that other country. Didn't stay long. The saturation point came quickly. I wish I knew the ratio. Is it 50 - 50? 60 - 40? 70 - 30? We are as different in our thinking as night is from day.
You know, I kind of feel sorry for them. All of that impotent, repressed metrosexual, beta-male, passive-aggressive rage and nothing to show for it. Sad, sad little man-boys.
And the women there are something else too. Ladies, you are reading this; I just want you to know that I forgive you, even if you do not forgive your father.
You must have really gotten under their skin Mike, for them to cross dress you twice. All the while they lamely try to insult you, they veer far and away from any discussion of the issues, and especially from any of the glaring difficulties produced by der "Fuhrer" and his extra-Constitutional activities. How does it go? First ridiculed, then violently opposed, then accepted as truth. Stage Two is on its way.
It seems they have taken your post pictures personally (not really understanding that everybody gets that feature here on Sipseystreet) and responded with mike in a dress.
Sheesh. A pissing match - where the only assured outcome is people with piss on them.
And now to another claim witnessed demonstrated that they aren't regular readers. They don't understand that comments aren't instant so they claim mike isn't allowing any comments here.
It will be funny when Mike releases comments as he does and then highlights some of the more ummm diligent ummm examples as he does from time to time.
Funniest is all the deleted comments over there making it seem that "the other side" is so nasty.
How long before they realize that the only ones believing their game is them? Transparency. Uh huh. Just like the usurper himself - it easy to see right through....
The comments I saw were pretty good... 2A people hammering the libs with facts, the libs losing and then either deleting the comments or trying to divert the conversation back to some subjective point they could manage...
I'd imagine they're not happy you linked to them again... :-)
How can we avoid a civilian war when we share a country with people who think the way Colmes and his listeners/readers do? They are Communists, Collectivists and Progressive Authoritarians who understand that their ideal vision of a country is necessarily incompatible with what the Founders intended. They admit as much and they have no intention of ever changing their mind or their intentions for us. I have absolutely no intention of moving away from my convictions that the Founders had it right and that those who follow the U.S. Constitution have the natural, moral and legal advantage here. I'd rather right than switch - I guess we will see what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object? Those worthless dumbass bastards better hope they want Communism more than I want freedom 'cause otherwise those bastards are screwed. And I can guarantee you that I want freedom more than they want to take it away from me. No friends, this coming conflagration is inevitable - not because we want it, but because these arrogant brainless panty-waisted losers are not going to stop pushing until they get one. God bless America and all who defend her. The rest can go to hell.
You were on target Mike because you are sure taking flak. The nation is Balkanizing more each day . These minor dust ups are nothing to what is coming . My thought is Coxeys Army on steroids.
The anti gun zealots cannot withstand straightforward factual debate. Regular folks posting in support of Second Amendment rights, and rights in general, are hammering their idiocy.
Now, that begs the question... Why aren't Republicans doing exactly the same thing in state houses, state senates and the federal congress? Ok ok, in several states there are some doing so, but how can it be such a tiny select few when we the people in support of individual rights so outnumber the anti rights agenda?
Polls? Polls?
How about reading the writing on the internet walls you republican (supposedly) party? How about making the case as well as we are doing - and from the elected positions you ASKED to be put into?
"How can we avoid a civilian war when we share a country with people who think the way Colmes and his listeners/readers do?"
The recipe for peace is Panarchy AKA political tolerance. Just like 200 years ago when we got rid of established religions and the wars between religions (mostly) stopped, the same thing will happen between political theories.
Yes, a war will happen. But eventually people will figure out that the pain of war is not compensated by the ability to plunder one's political opposites. Then we will have political tolerance.
There is not a thing wrong with Communism as long as all those subject to it, agree to it. Likewise any other political philosophy. It's just not anybody else's business. Some day we will get to the point, that the different polities leave each other alone. Mostly because it hurts too much when they don't.
Gee's O' Pete! It took me all of 30 minutes to get banned from that pansy site. Soooooo hyper sensitive are those libtards? No "tolerance" for an opposing point of view and no sense of humor either. You can tell from the tone deaf and mindless, redundant, lockstep posts that they're scared to the point of shatting themselves. God Bless Mike Vanderboegh! (GBMV) He basically sounds like a typical member of the violent, subversive, radical, un-American Weather Underground of Bill Ayers, Bernadine Dohrn and B. Hussein Obama fame. You'd think the fascist lefty moonbats would be eating this stuff up aye? Anyway, loved the tongue in cheek cheekiness of this interview. I thought Colms was going to wet his thong.
It appears you have quoted or partially quoted the only non Soros commissar approved thought on this comments page. Since you did our side this favor I will try to explain It to you and hopefully you will quickly quote the explanation part for your fellow leftys.
Since everything else is getting deleted there must be a limit of some form. Mental age is another way of measuring intelligence. Equivalent is the queens English for a variant of equal meaning "have the same value, even though they may look different". I have found that liberals, like children under 11 are unable to understand the concept of opportunity costs, if taxpayers are explained the concepts of opportunity costs they become conservative. Everyone is born liberal wanting big daddy govt to take care of them some people grow up. Margret Thatcher understood some poor people would like to better themselves and become prosperous.
They even deleted my comment response to the small penis crack. I pointed out that it was gender stereotyping & the gays with guns in Pinkpistols dot org are more manly than straight leftists.
They also deleted my link to Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership. Actually everything I put is gone.
@Paul X: "The recipe for peace is Panarchy AKA political tolerance."
That would suppose the Commies would be content to leave the rest of us alone. Maybe in a fantasy world? By it's very nature, Communism cannot respect other political views - as it needs EVERYONE to join in, lest it fail. Of course, it fails anyway due to human nature which realizes it's stupid to work harder just to let those who work less take what you have produced. No, there is no such thing as "political tolerance" when collectivists are concerned.
If it's tolerance you seek, then you want Libertarianism and Capitalism - or, as the Founders intended it, a Constitutional Republic. As long as Commies, Collectivists and Progressive Authoritarians walk the Earth, we will have to guard against their intrusions into our lives. Unfortunately the only proven method for eliminating the threat these bastards present is to kill them.
Aside from the obvious it is important to maintain links to the 'enemy'. Misunderstanding or misreading your enemy is almost as bad as doing nothing at all. Don't just respond. Learn. Don't just lash out. Collect Intel.
Also, remember, the downfall of the French Revolution, unless you liked human heads, was that the revolutionaries forgot or never had an idea of what might come after. Do not become the monster you are fighting. Do not look into the abyss and forget that it, then, looks into you.
Well that was interesting... it never fails to amaze me how certain people think that they have not only the right, but the duty to think and act for anyone other than themselves. Those people are the reason this will get ugly. They don't know how to just leave it alone and let people like me live the way we want to live. I understand what it is that has them all uptight. It's the fact that we will not be ruled like peasants, AND we have the means to secure that very existence through superior tenacity, and will... not to mention firepower. The fact remains however, that they are not getting the message that I (I can only, ever speak for myself, you understand) pose no threat unless provoked by someone of ill intent. It comes down to trust. Don't get me wrong here, it's not like I don't trust them... it's just that I don't trust them. I trust ME. They should get used to it, mostly because that's how it's going to be.
I especially loved the cop that railed about how liberals are armed too, and that he would be a formidable adversary! It's been my experience that most cops can't shoot. I could be crazy here, and there are exceptions, but I'll takes me chances.
Hi Mike, "Plagiarism is the sincerest form of flattery." Some years ago when Ron Reagan was President some left wing loons ridiculed him claiming that he was, among other things, a "Transvestite!!" All this being espoused from the fact that he was a professional actor at one time?? Since they can't think of "Anything new," they go for something they have tried before (and forgot that it failed!!) Oh well.
Gunfire! The sound of Freedom, Carry On, III%, skybill-out
so, if you had 37000 twitter followers like they do, then they would listen to you? sounds a little self-centered and shallow. bill buckley said, "Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views."
Jim, you are correct about elimination but as civilized people we can agree that mitigation is a possible solution - and when possible it is far less barbaric. See, the muzzies refuse mitigation and just seek total elimination and that just breeds barbarism.
What we must adhere to is the PROMISE of DEFENSIVE retaliation to aggression. Both the progs and the muzzies endlessly portray themselves as the victims and us as the aggressors because they both KNOW that when they are exposed as the aggressors, we are within our rights to fight back.
So elimination is THEIR creed. Live and let live, in common freedom and respect for all peoples rights is ours. I liked your post and agree with the vast majority but take care not to become the very thing you aim to defend against. Don't fall into that trap. Remember, we will not shoot first, but we will absolutely shoot BACK. IOW, we will not fight, but we will fight back. That is the very basic difference between us and them.
I am not advocating aggression or provocation. What I am saying is that we are fast approaching that moment in time where "tolerating" the progressives will no longer be an option. THEY are the attackers, incremental as it may be. You nailed it by pointing out that we will fight back - however, I think it is critically important to realize that at some point, we will be forced to respond to this incremental procedural policy attack on our rights and lives with violence for the simple fact that they are making it ever impossible to respond in any other way. When they rig the elections, ignore redress of griviences and continue to erode our rights, tax is to death and deny the common defense, then what choice do we have. I will not let them legislate me out of existence. I personally don't give two shits if my enemy feels I am immoral or have ceded the moral high ground. It is my intent to defend my life and liberty and that of my family. Whatever it takes to do that is what I will do. Unfortunately, my instincts and my experience tell me that means a war is coming. These fuckers are not content, nor will thy ever be content to leave me alone.
Jim, I'm standing with you and agree with what you wrote there. Just never lose sight of the fact that you must remain in the realm of defending yourself and your liberty. It's a fine line (intentionally blurred by nefarious bastards) between what you are saying and what those "eliminate" all gun owners progressive pukes are saying.
Keep hold of the line like you did there! You seek no conflict with them, you only wish to be left alone. That way, you remain proper, for any violence you do have to engage in is clearly out of the act of defending yourself from those peckernecks usurpations appetite for your Liberty.
"That would suppose the Commies would be content to leave the rest of us alone. Maybe in a fantasy world? By it's very nature, Communism cannot respect other political views - as it needs EVERYONE to join in, lest it fail."
Not true. Israeli Kibbutzim were (and maybe still are) Communist. The Pilgrims were also communist but they gave it up peacefully (I don't have any problems with giving people what they want so they can learn from their mistakes). People CAN decide not to attack others - generally as you said, by deciding it would be too painful to try.
Back in the old days, it was considered equally impossible for Catholics to tolerate Protestants, and vice versa. Yet here we are, more or less religiously tolerant.
As to the Constitutional Republic, I have no use for that either. Representative government is a (literally impossible) sham concealing what we really have, oligarchy. I would be as active against Constitutionalist imposition as against a Communist one. If you think your variety of imposition is extra special and should be pushed through, you are going to have a big surprise.
That's is why I push political tolerance. Even Constitutionalists are capable of learning and profiting by it, heh.
29 comments:
Hey Mike..... It's a Freedom thing. Us refusing to be disarmed. The LIBERALS just don't understand.... They will call for us when they are herded into camps......
Well, Sparky, you did. And you didn't acquit yourself too well.
But I do like the photoshop of Vanderboegh. Objectively pro-gun, and stylin' baby!
I'm not giving their site any clicks. Mike, since you did, how about mirroring a couple of the comments here at Sipsey St, and give us a laugh or two.
I find it hi-larious that they think that the armed services would side with them in a conflict. Do they not know where the demographics that make up the 5 branches come from? Not so many come from Liberaland. More than a few come from flyover territory.
I would point out that they had not thought this through, but that would be stating the obvious on just about every facet of their miserable, unfulfilled and hateful lives. I guess that policy of shitting on the military for the past 40 years had a couple of unintended consequences, huh?
Wow, I ventured into that other country. Didn't stay long. The saturation point came quickly.
I wish I knew the ratio. Is it 50 - 50? 60 - 40? 70 - 30? We are as different in our thinking as night is from day.
You know, I kind of feel sorry for them. All of that impotent, repressed metrosexual, beta-male, passive-aggressive rage and nothing to show for it. Sad, sad little man-boys.
And the women there are something else too. Ladies, you are reading this; I just want you to know that I forgive you, even if you do not forgive your father.
You must have really gotten under their skin Mike, for them to cross dress you twice. All the while they lamely try to insult you, they veer far and away from any discussion of the issues, and especially from any of the glaring difficulties produced by der "Fuhrer" and his extra-Constitutional activities. How does it go? First ridiculed, then violently opposed, then accepted as truth. Stage Two is on its way.
It seems they have taken your post pictures personally (not really understanding that everybody gets that feature here on Sipseystreet) and responded with mike in a dress.
Sheesh. A pissing match - where the only assured outcome is people with piss on them.
And now to another claim witnessed demonstrated that they aren't regular readers. They don't understand that comments aren't instant so they claim mike isn't allowing any comments here.
It will be funny when Mike releases comments as he does and then highlights some of the more ummm diligent ummm examples as he does from time to time.
Funniest is all the deleted comments over there making it seem that "the other side" is so nasty.
How long before they realize that the only ones believing their game is them? Transparency. Uh huh. Just like the usurper himself - it easy to see right through....
Then they said, lefties are armed. Oh, that's a hoot and a holler.
Watch this fellas. Your life may depend on it in the future:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=piWCBOsJr-w
The comments I saw were pretty good... 2A people hammering the libs with facts, the libs losing and then either deleting the comments or trying to divert the conversation back to some subjective point they could manage...
I'd imagine they're not happy you linked to them again... :-)
How can we avoid a civilian war when we share a country with people who think the way Colmes and his listeners/readers do? They are Communists, Collectivists and Progressive Authoritarians who understand that their ideal vision of a country is necessarily incompatible with what the Founders intended. They admit as much and they have no intention of ever changing their mind or their intentions for us. I have absolutely no intention of moving away from my convictions that the Founders had it right and that those who follow the U.S. Constitution have the natural, moral and legal advantage here. I'd rather right than switch - I guess we will see what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object? Those worthless dumbass bastards better hope they want Communism more than I want freedom 'cause otherwise those bastards are screwed. And I can guarantee you that I want freedom more than they want to take it away from me. No friends, this coming conflagration is inevitable - not because we want it, but because these arrogant brainless panty-waisted losers are not going to stop pushing until they get one. God bless America and all who defend her. The rest can go to hell.
Jim
You were on target Mike because you are sure taking flak. The nation is Balkanizing more each day . These minor dust ups are nothing to what is coming . My thought is Coxeys Army on steroids.
The anti gun zealots cannot withstand straightforward factual debate. Regular folks posting in support of Second Amendment rights, and rights in general, are hammering their idiocy.
Now, that begs the question...
Why aren't Republicans doing exactly the same thing in state houses, state senates and the federal congress?
Ok ok, in several states there are some doing so, but how can it be such a tiny select few when we the people in support of individual rights so outnumber the anti rights agenda?
Polls? Polls?
How about reading the writing on the internet walls you republican (supposedly) party? How about making the case as well as we are doing - and from the elected positions you ASKED to be put into?
As far as checking out their website....shame on you for posting the link...."I went, I saw, I puked!!!!!"
"How can we avoid a civilian war when we share a country with people who think the way Colmes and his listeners/readers do?"
The recipe for peace is Panarchy AKA political tolerance. Just like 200 years ago when we got rid of established religions and the wars between religions (mostly) stopped, the same thing will happen between political theories.
Yes, a war will happen. But eventually people will figure out that the pain of war is not compensated by the ability to plunder one's political opposites. Then we will have political tolerance.
There is not a thing wrong with Communism as long as all those subject to it, agree to it. Likewise any other political philosophy. It's just not anybody else's business. Some day we will get to the point, that the different polities leave each other alone. Mostly because it hurts too much when they don't.
Gee's O' Pete! It took me all of 30 minutes to get banned from that pansy site. Soooooo hyper sensitive are those libtards? No "tolerance" for an opposing point of view and no sense of humor either.
You can tell from the tone deaf and mindless, redundant, lockstep posts that they're scared to the point of shatting themselves.
God Bless Mike Vanderboegh! (GBMV)
He basically sounds like a typical member of the violent, subversive, radical, un-American Weather Underground of Bill Ayers, Bernadine Dohrn and B. Hussein Obama fame. You'd think the fascist lefty moonbats would be eating this stuff up aye?
Anyway, loved the tongue in cheek cheekiness of this interview. I thought Colms was going to wet his thong.
Sure doesn't take long to get blocked from their site.
Here is my comment to Eric Trommater on the site.
It appears you have quoted or partially quoted the only non Soros commissar approved thought on this comments page. Since you did our side this favor I will try to explain It to you and hopefully you will quickly quote the explanation part for your fellow leftys.
Since everything else is getting deleted there must be a limit of some form. Mental age is another way of measuring intelligence. Equivalent is the queens English for a variant of equal meaning "have the same value, even though they may look different".
I have found that liberals, like children under 11 are unable to understand the concept of opportunity costs, if taxpayers are explained the concepts of opportunity costs they become conservative. Everyone is born liberal wanting big daddy govt to take care of them some people grow up. Margret Thatcher understood some poor people would like to better themselves and become prosperous.
They even deleted my comment response to the small penis crack.
I pointed out that it was gender stereotyping & the gays with guns in Pinkpistols dot org are more manly than straight leftists.
They also deleted my link to Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership. Actually everything I put is gone.
@Paul X: "The recipe for peace is Panarchy AKA political tolerance."
That would suppose the Commies would be content to leave the rest of us alone. Maybe in a fantasy world? By it's very nature, Communism cannot respect other political views - as it needs EVERYONE to join in, lest it fail. Of course, it fails anyway due to human nature which realizes it's stupid to work harder just to let those who work less take what you have produced. No, there is no such thing as "political tolerance" when collectivists are concerned.
If it's tolerance you seek, then you want Libertarianism and Capitalism - or, as the Founders intended it, a Constitutional Republic. As long as Commies, Collectivists and Progressive Authoritarians walk the Earth, we will have to guard against their intrusions into our lives. Unfortunately the only proven method for eliminating the threat these bastards present is to kill them.
Jim
Aside from the obvious it is important to maintain links to the 'enemy'. Misunderstanding or misreading your enemy is almost as bad as doing nothing at all. Don't just respond. Learn. Don't just lash out. Collect Intel.
Also, remember, the downfall of the French Revolution, unless you liked human heads, was that the revolutionaries forgot or never had an idea of what might come after. Do not become the monster you are fighting. Do not look into the abyss and forget that it, then, looks into you.
Well that was interesting... it never fails to amaze me how certain people think that they have not only the right, but the duty to think and act for anyone other than themselves. Those people are the reason this will get ugly. They don't know how to just leave it alone and let people like me live the way we want to live. I understand what it is that has them all uptight. It's the fact that we will not be ruled like peasants, AND we have the means to secure that very existence through superior tenacity, and will... not to mention firepower. The fact remains however, that they are not getting the message that I (I can only, ever speak for myself, you understand) pose no threat unless provoked by someone of ill intent. It comes down to trust. Don't get me wrong here, it's not like I don't trust them... it's just that I don't trust them. I trust ME. They should get used to it, mostly because that's how it's going to be.
I especially loved the cop that railed about how liberals are armed too, and that he would be a formidable adversary! It's been my experience that most cops can't shoot. I could be crazy here, and there are exceptions, but I'll takes me chances.
Hi Mike,
"Plagiarism is the sincerest form of flattery." Some years ago when Ron Reagan was President some left wing loons ridiculed him claiming that he was, among other things, a "Transvestite!!" All this being espoused from the fact that he was a professional actor at one time?? Since they can't think of "Anything new," they go for something they have tried before (and forgot that it failed!!) Oh well.
Gunfire! The sound of Freedom,
Carry On,
III%,
skybill-out
so, if you had 37000 twitter followers like they do, then they would listen to you? sounds a little self-centered and shallow. bill buckley said, "Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views."
Jim, you are correct about elimination but as civilized people we can agree that mitigation is a possible solution - and when possible it is far less barbaric. See, the muzzies refuse mitigation and just seek total elimination and that just breeds barbarism.
What we must adhere to is the PROMISE of DEFENSIVE retaliation to aggression. Both the progs and the muzzies endlessly portray themselves as the victims and us as the aggressors because they both KNOW that when they are exposed as the aggressors, we are within our rights to fight back.
So elimination is THEIR creed. Live and let live, in common freedom and respect for all peoples rights is ours. I liked your post and agree with the vast majority but take care not to become the very thing you aim to defend against. Don't fall into that trap. Remember, we will not shoot first, but we will absolutely shoot BACK. IOW, we will not fight, but we will fight back. That is the very basic difference between us and them.
Anon@10:04
I am not advocating aggression or provocation. What I am saying is that we are fast approaching that moment in time where "tolerating" the progressives will no longer be an option. THEY are the attackers, incremental as it may be. You nailed it by pointing out that we will fight back - however, I think it is critically important to realize that at some point, we will be forced to respond to this incremental procedural policy attack on our rights and lives with violence for the simple fact that they are making it ever impossible to respond in any other way. When they rig the elections, ignore redress of griviences and continue to erode our rights, tax is to death and deny the common defense, then what choice do we have. I will not let them legislate me out of existence. I personally don't give two shits if my enemy feels I am immoral or have ceded the moral high ground. It is my intent to defend my life and liberty and that of my family. Whatever it takes to do that is what I will do. Unfortunately, my instincts and my experience tell me that means a war is coming. These fuckers are not content, nor will thy ever be content to leave me alone.
Jim
I was feeling well today and went to the site indicated.
Other than their ridiculous dress fetish, there is nothing there of interest, humorous or otherwise.
Liberlaland is a waste of bandwidth. among the worst ever seen. Folks that actually "read" that site looking for news will be sorely disappointed.
Jim, I'm standing with you and agree with what you wrote there. Just never lose sight of the fact that you must remain in the realm of defending yourself and your liberty. It's a fine line (intentionally blurred by nefarious bastards) between what you are saying and what those "eliminate" all gun owners progressive pukes are saying.
Keep hold of the line like you did there! You seek no conflict with them, you only wish to be left alone. That way, you remain proper, for any violence you do have to engage in is clearly out of the act of defending yourself from those peckernecks usurpations appetite for your Liberty.
We are peers Jim - no doubt about it -
"That would suppose the Commies would be content to leave the rest of us alone. Maybe in a fantasy world? By it's very nature, Communism cannot respect other political views - as it needs EVERYONE to join in, lest it fail."
Not true. Israeli Kibbutzim were (and maybe still are) Communist. The Pilgrims were also communist but they gave it up peacefully (I don't have any problems with giving people what they want so they can learn from their mistakes). People CAN decide not to attack others - generally as you said, by deciding it would be too painful to try.
Back in the old days, it was considered equally impossible for Catholics to tolerate Protestants, and vice versa. Yet here we are, more or less religiously tolerant.
As to the Constitutional Republic, I have no use for that either. Representative government is a (literally impossible) sham concealing what we really have, oligarchy. I would be as active against Constitutionalist imposition as against a Communist one. If you think your variety of imposition is extra special and should be pushed through, you are going to have a big surprise.
That's is why I push political tolerance. Even Constitutionalists are capable of learning and profiting by it, heh.
Post a Comment