Tell me again, all you prags and Fudds, how we can count on the black robes to protect our natural, God-given and inalienable rights.
No, really, tell me -- Supreme Court ducks three gun cases.
Considering the slim 5 - 4 majority rulings in the two most recent Second Amendment cases, and noting that elections have consequences (as Republicans appear to be doing their best to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory), it may be preferable for gun owners if a decision from SCOTUS would come sooner rather than later. Regardless, all the court need do at present to ensure the continuation of Second Amendment infringements is ... nothing, as they just demonstrated.
4 comments:
Noncompliance could become the only way for gun owners to live.
Shane
Why the hell do we always assume we need their permission.. only those who disbelieve their rights are natural would assume such stupidity.. we have the right by natural law of God, we dont need their ascent or nod or permission.
Who cares what they say or do.. they will only make us criminals anyway.
Act like free men and you will eventually begin to think like one.
Will some one please read the constitution Article 2 Section 3 and tell me where it says that SCOTUS has the responsibility to interpret the bill of rights.. PLEASE !! I cant seem to find it anywhere.
Yank lll
FUCK THE SUPREME COURT. THEY ARE JUST AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AS ANY OTHER PART OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. We need to just quietly be civilly disobedient to any law we deem unconstitutional!
I agree with all of the above! The tide is slowly changing in America and as the commies number dwindle they will be forced to make a move. Just be patient and quietly disobey.
Post a Comment