From Ralph Peters referring to this.
The only people who will benefit from an American civil war are our traditional collectivist enemies overseas. You have to wonder if that's not the whole purpose of our domestic enemies.
From Ralph Peters referring to this.
The only people who will benefit from an American civil war are our traditional collectivist enemies overseas. You have to wonder if that's not the whole purpose of our domestic enemies.
5 comments:
So-called "cybercrime" is not a legitimate crime.
We open our computers for digital access to everyone on earth, essentially.
If we want secure connections, then we should not share our computers with the whole world.
As long as our computers are connected to each other, it is always theoretically possible to monitor each other.
Doesn't matter. When AmRev II starts, so long as I'm "taking care" of domestic enemies, I can also "take care" of foreign ones at the same time.
B Woodman
III-PER
"The only people who will benefit from an American civil war are our traditional collectivist enemies overseas. You have to wonder if that's not the whole purpose of our domestic enemies."
It's not the whole purpose but I do not doubt that it's part of their plan.
What choice do we have? We must deal with the domestic enemy first, obviously. If we make sufficient example of them, the others will be given reason to reconsider, and we will have time to encourage them further.
Or not but, as I said, what other choice do we have?
It's all false-flag. Do the failed "cyper-security" bills ring any bells?
"Our" government does it to them - we shouldn't be surprised when their government does it to us.
If there is ever a war with China, it will be because our ruling class finds it in their interest to start one. Not because it is in the interest of us "mundanes"; there is no earthly reason we should be fighting them. They are not our enemy. Mordor on the Potomac is our enemy.
Post a Comment