He'll get back to us on that one. Killing citizens with care.
"FBI director: Have to check whether targeted killing rule is outside US only."
But Jonathan Turley, a law professor at George Washington University, wrote in Foreign Policy magazine on Wednesday that Holder's remarks not only would be seen by the framers of the Constitution as "the very definition of authoritarian power," but were met "not with outcry but muted applause."
"Holder's new definition of 'due process' was perfectly Orwellian," Turley wrote. "What Holder is describing is a model of an imperial presidency that would have made Richard Nixon blush. ...
"Where due process once resided, Holder offered only an assurance that the president would kill citizens with care. While that certainly relieved any concern that Obama would hunt citizens for sport, Holder offered no assurances on how this power would be used in the future beyond the now all-too-familiar 'trust us' approach to civil liberties of this administration," he wrote.
13 comments:
It seems more 'caring' than walking 1000s of guns into the arms of violent criminals, resulting in 100s of indiscriminate deaths.
Come on, you whiners -- we really do have the best government that money can buy, now don't we?
I guess because due process has been eliminated from the bill of rights and it's no-holds-barred, DOJ should expect no quarter as well. None will be given.
think back to ole J edgar and the the 30s. they went after the bad guys and killed them. there were also times in between then and now when American citizens have been targeted and killed.
it wouldn't surprise me if the recent death of the very effective conservative talk show host wasn't orchestrated.
"[T]he operation would be conducted in a manner consistent with applicable law of war principles," Holder said.
The civil war (the current one) has been going on for some time. I am glad a member of the current administration just acknowledged it.
I trust him... seems legit.
What is our (The III pers) line in the sand? Will it take just one more liberty lost? Or another after that?
DD
Mike,
I hope all is well with your health and that of your family. God bless you for continuing to get the word out.
Rest assured knowing that more people are becoming aware of just who was elected in 2008. Your threeper's are multiplying and spreading the undeniable facts of what happened with F&F, gangwalker, FOIA changes etc.
Here are some blogposts from a popular law blog I visit to keep up with court interpretation with corresponding comment sections.
http://volokh.com/2012/03/07/licenses-to-carry-guns-protection-against-robbery-and-protection-against-rape/#com-head
http://volokh.com/2012/03/05/right-to-carry-victory-in-colorado-students-for-concealed-carry-on-campus-v-regents/
Cheers
Tparty
Just stating the Obvious.
it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
Followup to my comment about the CIA's "heart attack" gun.
Reportedly, a man named Christopher Lasseter witnessed Andrew Breitbart's slump. And he noted his skin color was "bright red." The source is CrimeFileNews, cited at FreeRepublic:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2856495/posts
Among the comments there is one by a boarded toxicologist whose first thought, because of Breitbart's skin color, was cyanide poisoning.
Contradicting this 'conspiracy' theory, another poster observed:
". . . Brietbart at CPAC during an interview. The man is sweating profusely...I’ve had friends who had heart attacks and the only preceeding signs in the days before was profuse sweating. . . ."
How's that for occupational therapy, Mike?
God bless you.
It would appear that the question has already been answered by the Government's actions at Ruby Ridge and the Branch Davidian Compound. If the Clinton administration had no qualms about attacking U.S. citizens on U.S. soil, how much fewer qualms would the Obama administration be expected to demonstrate?
While I do not expect that we will have much to worry about from tac-nukes or napalm, UAV attacks would appear to be "surgical" enough to be a real threat. If we know where the control centers for the UAVs are located, that would appear to be the best defense against attacks by UAVs. Remember, while UAVs are unmanned, they are not autonomous. They ARE controlled by personnel somewhere.
Carbon Monoxide poisoning causes cherry red skin coloration, not cyanide, which is both traceable and unnecessary considering the utility of the former.
Well that`s reassuring isn`t it ?."The president will use care when killing citizen`s" How do we interpret that remark ? If you didn`t vote for him your dead ? he intend`s to do the job right the first time ? .Thank you Senator McCain thank you senator Levin and thank you too lisping Lindsey you are truly shining example`s of America`s "Servant`s of the People".
My reply to “Carbon Monoxide poisoning causes cherry red skin coloration, not cyanide”:
Go here and watch the linked video CIA Whistleblower: “Heart attack gun” . . .
http://homelandsecurityus.com/archives/5693
Then search for relevant comments you’ll hear in the video.
Post a Comment