"…There is no evidence that Mr. Romney ever fought for a conservative nominee…He passively accepted the reality that he needed to nominate four Democrats (or independents) for every Republican to the Massachusetts bench."
What evidence we do have concerning Mitt Romney's character indicates that he implicitly accepts the fatalism of Bobby Knight. "I think that if rape is inevitable, relax and enjoy it."
Mittens sure seems to enjoy giving pleasure to Democrats, doesn't he?
MALTHUS
WV: paging--Republicans, please begin paging the ghost of Ronald Reagan!
I rejected the same unknown link by Anonymous at January 22 7:17 PM from WarOnGuns. I need to know what it is before going there and potentially exposing myself and readers to malware--it's not like we haven't experienced attacks before from those who wish us ill. It could by legit, but without knowing it is, I invited Anonymous to contact me if he wishes me to allow his comment--otherwise, it hardly seems worth the risk.
6 comments:
GINGRICH'S FUTURIST IDEOLOGY
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/021106.html
Eric holder has been outed by anonymous:
pastebin.com/iquHfjBa
Hmm, Dan Restrepo, the guy you fingered as the Ollie North of F&F:
/sipseystreetirregulars.blogspot.com/2011/04/meet-dan-restrepo-is-dan-oliver-north.html
used to work at Williams and Connolly.
Patrick Cunningham has retained counsel from Williams and Connolly.
God damn, another on of them odd coincidences.
"…There is no evidence that Mr. Romney ever fought for a conservative nominee…He passively accepted the reality that he needed to nominate four Democrats (or independents) for every Republican to the Massachusetts bench."
What evidence we do have concerning Mitt Romney's character indicates that he implicitly accepts the fatalism of Bobby Knight. "I think that if rape is inevitable, relax and enjoy it."
Mittens sure seems to enjoy giving pleasure to Democrats, doesn't he?
MALTHUS
WV: paging--Republicans, please begin paging the ghost of Ronald Reagan!
GOOD article. Can we still send in questions for tonight's debate?
I posted a link on Facebook to the amnation page.
I'd like to go back sometime and see what else he's had to say.
I rejected the same unknown link by Anonymous at January 22 7:17 PM from WarOnGuns. I need to know what it is before going there and potentially exposing myself and readers to malware--it's not like we haven't experienced attacks before from those who wish us ill. It could by legit, but without knowing it is, I invited Anonymous to contact me if he wishes me to allow his comment--otherwise, it hardly seems worth the risk.
Post a Comment