Monday, February 27, 2012

The latest letter from Issa and Grassley to Holder.

CBS reports: Congressional investigators fault ATF's "irresponsible tactic" in ICE agent murder.
The press release:
Monday, February 27, 2012
Issa: Becca Watkins (202) 225-0037
Grassley: Beth Levine (202) 224-6197
Issa, Grassley Continue to Press for Answers in Zapata Murder
Evidence Reveals that Similar Investigative Tactics to Fast and Furious were Used
WASHINGTON – Chairman Darrell Issa Senator Chuck Grassley today questioned Attorney General Eric Holder about revelations that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) was aware of straw buying by Manuel Barba during a several month span of which one of the weapons found at the murder scene of Immigrations and Customs Enforcement Officer Jaime Zapata was purchased.
In a letter to Holder today, Issa and Grassley wrote that in addition to Otilio and Rafael Osorio and Kelvin Morrison, which they have previously asked about and received non-substantive responses, it appears that another straw purchaser with ties to the Zapata murder was well-known to ATF officials. In their letter, they wrote, “Records indicate that ATF opened a case against Manuel Barba in June 2010,[1] approximately two months before he took possession on August 20, 2010, of the rifle which was later trafficked to Mexico and also used in the murder of Agent Zapata.[2] Additionally, the documents show that ATF had indications in October 2010 that Barba was obliterating serial numbers on weapons, the possession of which would have been a prosecutable offense.[3]” Yet, Barba was not arrested until February 14, 2011.
Issa and Grassley have been investigating the actions of the Justice Department and the ATF that allowed gunwalking, guns purchased by known straw buyers who then often transferred the firearms to Mexican Drug Cartels, to occur in at least one ATF field office jurisdiction.
One of the major flaws found in the tactics used in Operation Fast and Furious, where gunwalking was known to occur, was the failure to conduct surveillance of individuals known to be trafficking weapons to Mexico, which allowed such firearms to reach the border. Issa and Grassley said that the same irresponsible tactic appears to have been used as the ATF allowed guns to cross the border in Texas. . .
The letter:
February 27, 2012
VIA ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION
The Honorable Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530
Dear Attorney General Holder:
For almost an entire year, we have been requesting that the Department provide information about the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives’ (ATF’s) knowledge regarding Otilio Osorio’s straw purchasing activities. We are interested in him because he was the straw purchaser of the weapon used in the murder of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Agent Jaime Zapata on February 15, 2011.
Letters from Senator Grassley on March 4, 2011, and March 28, 2011 provided documentation that, on September 17, 2010, ATF traced trafficked weapons to Otilio’s brother and co-habitant, Ranferi Osorio, as well as the Osorio brothers’ next-door neighbor, Kelvin Morrison. Senator Grassley further inquired why these facts did not prompt ATF to conduct a “knock and talk” with these individuals or begin conducting surveillance on them.
On November 9, 2010, as part of a Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) investigation, ATF witnessed Otilio and Ranferi Osorio providing 40 weapons with obliterated serial numbers to an undercover ATF informant for the purpose of trafficking the weapons to Mexico. Surprisingly, they were not arrested for another three and a half months. Senator Grassley further inquired why they were not arrested at the time they were observed to be in possession of weapons with obliterated serial numbers, which is a crime. He asked whether ATF or DEA continued to surveil the Osorio brothers between early November and their arrest, following the discovery that Otilio Osorio’s weapon was used in the murder of Agent Zapata. Inexplicably, the Department has failed to provide substantive responses to any of these letters, including a subsequent follow-up letter on this matter, sent jointly on October 25, 2011.
ATF has tried to distinguish this case from Operation Fast and Furious and to justify its failure to intervene. In one news article on the Osorio brothers, ATF North Texas spokesperson Tom Crowley is quoted as saying: “[T]aking them down and arresting them at that time would have possibly jeopardized that investigation. . . . None of the tactics used in this investigation were anything similar to what was used in Arizona’s Fast and Furious, including intentionally walking firearms across the border.”[4] Yet failure to conduct surveillance of individuals known to be trafficking weapons to Mexico was a core problem with the tactics used in Fast and Furious. Lack of surveillance is what allowed such firearms to reach the border. The same irresponsible tactic appears to have been used in this matter.
Now, news reports indicate that this may have been an issue with a purchaser of another one of the weapons found at Agent Zapata’s murder scene.[5] Records indicate that ATF opened a case against Manuel Barba in June 2010,[6] approximately two months before he took possession on August 20, 2010, of the rifle which was later trafficked to Mexico and also used in the murder of Agent Zapata.[7] Additionally, the documents show that ATF had indications in October 2010 that Barba was obliterating serial numbers on weapons, the possession of which would have been a prosecutable offense.[8] At least as of December 13, 2010, ATF also was aware that Barba was still under indictment for a 2006 state case, and thus had been unlawfully receiving firearms while under indictment.[9] However, a warrant was not issued for Barba’s arrest in this case until February 14, 2011.[10]
To assist us in better understanding of the circumstances leading up to the murder of Agent Zapata, please answer the following questions:
1. Did ATF have any contact with Barba, such as a “knock and talk,” between June 7, 2010, when Barba’s case was opened, and August 20, 2010, when he received the weapon that would later be used in the murder of Agent Zapata?
2. When did ATF agents first contact Barba in connection with this case?
3. Records indicate Federal Firearms Licensee (FFL) interviews were conducted in this case by early October 2010. When were FFLs first contacted by ATF in this case?
4. What information about Barba or the individuals known to be working with him as straw purchasers was communicated to the FFLs?
5. What cooperation did any FFLs agree to provide ATF in this investigation?
6. Did any FFLs ever provide ATF with advance or contemporaneous (within three days) notice of purchases by the individuals suspected to be working with Barba as straw purchasers?
7. Why was Barba not arrested in October 2010 when ATF obtained audio evidence that Barba was obliterating serial numbers before trafficking weapons to Mexico?
8. Why was Barba not arrested in December 2010 when ATF knew he had been unlawfully receiving firearms from straw purchasers while under indictment?
9. How many weapons were purchased between June 7, 2010, and February 14, 2011, by the straw purchasing ring associated with Barba?
10. How many weapons purchased between June 7, 2010, and February 14, 2011, by the straw purchasing ring associated with Barba were interdicted?
Thank you in advance for ensuring your response arrives no later than March 9, 2012. Should you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Ranking Member Grassley’s staff at (202) 224-5225 or Chairman Issa’s staff at (202) 225-5074.
Sincerely,
(Issa & Grassley signatures.)
cc: The Hon. B. Todd Jones, Acting Director, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
The Hon. Michele M. Leonhart, Administrator, U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration
The Hon. Elijah E. Cummings, Ranking Member, U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
The Hon. Patrick Leahy, Chairman, U.S. Senate, Committee on the Judiciary
[1] ATF Management Log for Case 782045-10-[redacted], Baytown Crew, available at http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/baytown.pdf (accessed Feb. 23, 2012).
[2] Plea Agreement, United States v. Barba, Case 4:11-cr-00087, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas (filed Oct. 31, 2011), at 9.
[3] ATF Management Log for Case 782045-10-[redacted], Baytown Crew.
[4] Jack Douglas Jr., “Fort Worth Gun Falls Into Wrong Hands, Kills U.S. Agent,” CBS 11 News (Feb. 15, 2011), available at http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2012/02/15/fort-worth-gun-falls-into-wrong-hands-kills-u-s-agent.
[5] Sharyl Attkisson, “Second gun used in ICE agent murder linked to ATF undercover operation,” CBS News (Feb. 22, 2012), available at http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-31727_162-57383089-10391695/second-gun-used-in-ice-agent-murder-linked-to-atf-undercover-operation.
[6] ATF Management Log for Case 782045-10-[redacted], Baytown Crew, available at http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/baytown.pdf (accessed Feb. 23, 2012).
[7] Plea Agreement, United States v. Barba, Case 4:11-cr-00087, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas (filed Oct. 31, 2011), at 9.
[8] ATF Management Log for Case 782045-10-[redacted], Baytown Crew.
[9] Id.
[10] Id.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Yep - another letter, that'll teach Holder. Boy i bet he'll never pull a stunt like Fast & Furious again, nor anyone else of his ilk.

I mean, reading these letters are punishment enough to discourage the most cynical, unethical, deviant liberal possible. I'll bet Holder loses sleep every time he gets on of these and shudders at the thought of another letter

Anyone denying that the fix is in, and there'll be contempt hearing of Holder or anyone else in his administration is smoking home rolls.

Next, when the republicans don't use this in the election campaign against the Immaculated One, we'll be told "just wait, you'll see"

when did the republicans actually hang up their balls? Did anyone notice?

SWIFT said...

I know that the title, "The Honorable", is bestowed on individuals attaining high office. But in this case; it turns my guts every time I read it prefacing a letter to Holder. Why should Issa and Grassley maintain the appearance of civility in this matter? It has no benefit, no extra leverage, or effect in stopping Holder's stonewalling. Wouldn't, "hey you slimy, perjuring , POS, dirtbag", net the same results? Why kiss his rectal orifice. Are they afraid some limp-wristed liberal will brand them as mean spirited? So what? Wear it like a badge of honor. Junk yard dog sounds damn good to me!

ParaPacem said...

Anonymous:
Damn straight!
Word on the Hill is, if Holder doesn't do better, then Issa will stamp his foot, AND make a pouty face!!!! And if even THAT does not work, he is prepared to hold his breath until he turns blue, roll in the floor and wail until Holder feels really, really ashamed of himself.
And you ask about Repube-icans hanging up their balls? What balls?

Anonymous said...

lots of finger danceing going on

If you going to do something

just do it, enough with the

silly ass letters

JAQUEBAUER said...

IS ISSA AND GRASSLEY GOING SEND LETTERS FOREVER ? OR ARE THESE GUYS WAITING FOR THE ELECTIONS FOR SOME REASON? NO MATTER, MY PERCPTION IS THESE GUYS WILL CONTINUE TO PLAY THE GAME THAT GIRLY MEN DO, THAT IS TO ACT BUSY AND IMPORTANT, AND HOLDER AND HIS GANG OF SUBVERSIVES WILL WALK FREE.

Anonymous said...

"when did the republicans actually hang up their balls? Did anyone notice? "

Ummm, yeah, I did.

It was right after Clinton replaced ALL the ASUAs with his appointments, which Bush left in place and after threats of revelations regarding Republicans were made it the news, and of course there was Filegate which involved Mrs. Clinton's office. I rather suspect that the remaining republicans knew and know very well what was in those files. I bet it was explained to them in detail by those who now OWN them.