Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "The Silent Rise of the Threeper Sleeper.":
Threeper, as In article III, Section iii
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
The Congress shall have power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
If you assholes are "protecting" the Constitution, you should bone up on what you are protecting.
YOU aren't protecting it, you are committing the only enumerated crime mentioned in it.
TREASON!
YOU ASSHOLES ARE TRAITORS, NOT PATRIOTS.
I HOPE THEY BLOW YOUR HOUSES OUT OF THE GROUND AND SCORCH THE EARTH TEY (sic) ARE BUILT UPON.
Well, there, I guess he told us, huh? I guess maybe he means like this:
Waco Jim? Is that you?
Mike
III
20 comments:
Notice he said "they" He is a coward, he would have others do that which, if he was a "real" man, he should in fact do himself, to help "protect his country". Pitiful excuse for a man.
Wayne B
Wow!!! What side of the bed did that "visionary" fall from? (and strike his or her head during the resultant impact... again)
Mike
III
Torries support the crown.
Quislings just want that pay check, and don't want to be bothered about liberties or that whole Constitution thingy.
"No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court."
Thats why another point is 3 can keep a secret if 2 are dead. If only they have gotten any understanding of oaths and honor.
However if this asshat would read the context of struggle and the documents, all of them, we "assholes" are protecting (restoring principals of)they would also find...
"Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed"
how does he respond to a removal of consent? Or to the money point of
"That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principals and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."
I know this is preaching to the choir, just venting.
Jason
III
Hey Jackass,
...We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness....
To paraphrase one of my forefathers - "if that is Treason then make the most of it..." oh, by the way, when you come to my house... bring everyone... you're gonna need 'em.
I must have missed the "levying war" and "aid and comfort" parts.
Pretty quiet in my AO this am....
I suggest that this "person" come and get me, right now, in person. I'll be waiting. Contact me, big boy, and let's you and I dance.
Enemies eh?
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.
Let's see..
I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic...
Enemies...enemies perhaps of the Constitutional Republic? Enemies of the foundation of Liberty and Freedom that the Founders of this once great Nation enumerated in the Bill of Rights? You know, those "unalienable" rights endowed unto us by our creator?
Enemies? Just who really is the enemy that is referenced by Article III, Section 3? Perhaps it is those such as that anonymous coward who would continue to enable the corrupt thugs in our Government to deprive us of our life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.
May they all rot in hell.
Having trouble looking in a mirror are ya?
I hope you and your kind ejoy you tumbrel ride for I fear it is comming to that in the future.
I'm willing to bet that's "Obediah" from the "JohnGaltFla" blog - you really should read her comments on "chapter XVIII" of TDTDD.
Just click on my name and it should take you there - scroll down to bottom of story-chapter to get to the first comment from "Obediah"
As to Mike's post - I was still sleepy when I read it and thought it was directed at the REAL traitors in DC...
Lessee... Destroying our entire Economic base through onerous taxation and insane regulation thus forcing millions of manufacturing jobs to move to China? Check!
Destroying our entire medical system through deliberate legislation - even if they have to do it through some obscure parliamentary procedure called "reconciliation" which was *NEVER* intended to be used for anything other than budget expenditures? Check!
Hell - read the Declaration of Independence and tell me which of the reasons our Founders gave for rejecting Fat George and his damnable dictatorship don't apply to us - IN SPADES - right now?
This Government stopped being legitimate damn near a century ago, but the WORST is what I've seen in the last ~20 years or so.
At this point I don't see any real way out without true ugliness but I agree with Mike 100%. We WILL NOT start it.
I really think a link to the original post would be good - especially since it's a year old...
See /sipseystreetirregulars.blogspot.com/2009/03/silent-rise-of-threeper-sleeper.html
"Organizing for America" (for those who do not know) is Dear Reader's campaign group "Obama For America" now shifted in name only From "Obama" to "Organizing" - a transparent falsehood given Dear Reader's "Organizer" history - into something claiming to be something other than Dear Reader's campaign group.
In sum - according to this mental-midget - if you "infiltrate" Dear Reader's campaign with the intent to inform those who stand against his marxist agenda, you're a traitor. Think on that for a moment.
According to it, you've levied war against AMERICA (not Dear Reader's merry band of kool-aid drinkers - AMERICA).
You've given aid and comfort to AMERICA'S (not Dear Reader's - AMERICA'S) enemies.
Perhaps it was referring solely to "The Brady Bunch" - in which case, According to it, you've levied war against and given aid and comfort to the enemies of AMERICA (not a bunch of fools who wish to eliminate the G*d-given right to self-defense and resistance to despotism enshrined in plain language in our Constitution - AMERICA).
OTOH, maybe it was seizing on the "three-letter" designation. If so - in its mind - you've levied war against and given aid and comfort to the enemies of AMERICA (not a bunch of jack-boots who DAILY violate the clear statements in our Constitution, who murder 90-year-old great-grandmothers, shoot children in the back or burn them to death in their church, who murder nursing women in their homes. You're not a traitor against those thugs - you're a traitor to AMERICA).
To be continued...
Continued...
I started this post with the intent to simply point out the idiocy inherent in such a comment, but I've built up quite a rage while typing this and decided to tell you how I REALLY feel...
Listen, Bitch: If your "america" consists of Marxist traitors, of people who would deny me my G*d given right to the tools necessary to defend my family and resist the onset of real tyranny as practiced by all of the above, of murderous thugs who believe they're above the law and above even the Constitution, you're G*d-Damned right. I **AM** a traitor to YOUR screwed-up vision of America and I'll be HONORED to give my life if necessary to fight for its defeat.
Why don't you try reading Article 1 Section 8 - which SPECIFICALLY defines what the .gov is allowed to do, and the 10th Amendment which makes clear that everything not on that list is SPECIFICALLY prohibited. Why don't you read the Federalist papers, the transcripts of the debates in the Constitutional Convention and the writings of the men who wrote that sacred document (not to mention the 10th Amendment) - so you could know (as I do) that those men made it PAINFULLY and PERFECTLY clear that the so-called "Interstate commerce" and "General welfare" clauses grant the .gov **NOT ONE IOTA** of right to do anything not specifically enumerated in the Constitution!
You, Bitch - and all of your kool-aid drinking ilk are the REAL traitors. You're willing to trade your birthright - LIBERTY - for some warm and fuzzy security-blanket that exists only in your twisted little mind. What you'll GET however is what all subjects of socialist states have gotten in the history of the world: Purges that murder millions, standing in line for days to get toilet paper, and all the happiness of all abused dogs in history - the opportunity to cower, to lick the hand that beats you, and beg for whatever crumbs might fall from your masters' table.
If that's enough for you, then you deserve only the scorn of all who know that we are CITIZENS - not subjects - and who will proudly proclaim "Give me LIBERTY or give me DEATH!"
A pox on all like you, and all your houses. You may choose to be a dog if you wish, but I'll be damned if you'll choose for me.
Come on...someone has to say it...." If this be trason, let us make the most of it"
To Anonymous @ February 20, 2010 12:56 PM
I STAND shoulder to shoulder with you. You have said what I wanted to say but could not put into words due to my anger. This f*#kstick is a True Turd and a ..........
Chris
III
Images of torries being driven from town wearing garments of tar and feathers come to mind...
This guy is one of those who would submit and defend all .gov practices until all of his freedoms are gone. Defenseless and enslaved, THEN he would start to complain.
It is an honor to be reviled by those who would defend this soft tyranny. It is an honor to be reviled by those who would protect the illegitimate monster we have in its infancy in Washington.
The best way to be seen as a threat is to quote and believe as did our founding fathers. Everyone remembers them, we all admire them, but few truly BELIEVE as they did, in freedom at any cost.
You, go back to your over regulated, government dominated life. There's some kool-aid waiting there for you.
Justin
III
"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort."
Well, lemme seeee..... hmmmm... war against the states. Says NOTHING about war against the asshats in DC. Since when are they the states? If they stand and say "we represent the states", then we are faced with two responses..
1) No, you don't. You represent yourselves.
and
2) We represent many people in the states, so, if we can't rise against you, then you can't rise against US. You'll have to take it up with the general population.
Oh, wait.... they're already DOING that!
I agree with this Quisling.
Just to make things clear, those who participated in the rebellion against King George were indisputably guilty of treason to the Crown of England.
So come on then, let's come clean, make a fresh start and be honest with ourselves. Weren't we better men for having the King's elegant polished boot planted firmly on our rebellious colonial necks?
Celebrate tyranny! because rebellion against it is just so yucky and someone may get inconvenienced by the necessity of preparing for resistance.
And someone could get hurt. And what will the neighbors think of me if I wear a Threeper's badge to my next Kiwanis meeting?!
MALTHUS
From one of my favorite movies- The Adventures of Robin Hood with Errol Flynn, he talks about how he will start the revolt against Prince John, Maid Marian,tells him "But sir, you speak treason!" To which Robin replys "Fluenty!"
Death to asshats.
Death to socialism.
But I repeat myself.
@Jay21:
Though not a part of those Sacred documents, the man who wrote them also said the following:
"...God forbid we should ever be 20 years without such a rebellion... If they remain quiet ... it is a lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty.
We have had 13 states independent 11 years. There has been one rebellion. That comes to one rebellion in a century & a half for each state.
What country before ever existed a century & half without a rebellion? & what country can preserve it's liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance?
Let them take arms! ... What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. It is it's natural manure..."
Indeed. I can't think of anything to add to that - except to point out that in these passages he was speaking of MASSACHUSETTS! Speaking of lethargy and loss of Liberty!
WV: "wilicu" -- as in "Will I see You" ... beside me on the ramparts come that fateful day?
Post a Comment