I don't believe they should be armed. Not by law or decree. However they are citizens of the USA and should have the right to protect themselves no mater where they are. We have too much of a problem these days with armed federal employees of all types. Every time we give a little they take the whole lot and create a precedence. Should there be guards? Perhaps. I am all for the people guarding them.
7 comments:
“Dear Gutless Worthless Terrorist Cowards, Meet An American With A Remington”
http://www.weaselzippers.us/229805-gatling-brothers-sing-about-islamic-terrorists-call-them-gutless-cowards/
Armed citizens guard recruiters after Tennessee shootings
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20150722/us--chattanooga_shooting-guarding_recruiters-a9bc06147b.html
I don't believe they should be armed. Not by law or decree. However they are citizens of the USA and should have the right to protect themselves no mater where they are. We have too much of a problem these days with armed federal employees of all types. Every time we give a little they take the whole lot and create a precedence. Should there be guards? Perhaps. I am all for the people guarding them.
As always, the comments are a source of entertainment. What a bunch of liberal idiot pisswits.
Posse Comitatus strikes again.
Ohio group plans civil disobedience of Cleveland’s new gun laws
http://www.guns.com/2015/07/23/ohio-group-plans-civil-disobedience-of-clevelands-new-gun-laws/
In North Carolina, the law on carrying weapons exempts military personnel during the performance of their duties. Simple.
Vic
Post a Comment