Main problem I see with this: glioblastomas where the wireless transceiver is mounted in the helmet - just like cell phone users experience. Not that he VA will give a $hit about treating those when they start appearing in vets. The denial will be: "Not service connected", just as cell phone manufacturers state in response to medical claims of their customers now. -MM
" glioblastomas where the wireless transceiver is mounted in the helmet - just like cell phone users experience."
Oh dear.
You know people who actually understand this stuff - wireless RF engineers like me, who have to give an account to the government for the radiative characteristics of anything we design -- just snort in derision at this kind of accusation, right? There is NO KNOWN CONNECTION between sores and low-level RF fields. None.
2 comments:
Main problem I see with this: glioblastomas where the wireless transceiver is mounted in the helmet - just like cell phone users experience. Not that he VA will give a $hit about treating those when they start appearing in vets. The denial will be: "Not service connected", just as cell phone manufacturers state in response to medical claims of their customers now.
-MM
" glioblastomas where the wireless transceiver is mounted in the helmet - just like cell phone users experience."
Oh dear.
You know people who actually understand this stuff - wireless RF engineers like me, who have to give an account to the government for the radiative characteristics of anything we design -- just snort in derision at this kind of accusation, right? There is NO KNOWN CONNECTION between sores and low-level RF fields. None.
Post a Comment