This is just "buy new stuff" in action. Dyneema is just a competitor for Kevlar, not a replacement and certainly not any real improvement. Any improvement in soldier body armor tech needs to come in the form of lighter, thinner plates that will still stop the Russian 7.62x54R AP round that the ESAPI plate was developed to counter. (The SAPI was not doing it) Another potential improvement would be plate coverage/configuration, but lighter, thinner plates need to come first. Put the money that will be wasted on buying thousands of new units of body armor that is no real improvement into R&D.
Where is the incentive to RandD body armor effectiveness when ATF uses effectiveness of body armor as a means to ban private ammunition commerce? Plus, those pesky Citizens might want more effective better performing body armor and the loyalist pukes are still working on more body armor bans....
2 comments:
This is just "buy new stuff" in action. Dyneema is just a competitor for Kevlar, not a replacement and certainly not any real improvement. Any improvement in soldier body armor tech needs to come in the form of lighter, thinner plates that will still stop the Russian 7.62x54R AP round that the ESAPI plate was developed to counter. (The SAPI was not doing it)
Another potential improvement would be plate coverage/configuration, but lighter, thinner plates need to come first. Put the money that will be wasted on buying thousands of new units of body armor that is no real improvement into R&D.
Where is the incentive to RandD body armor effectiveness when ATF uses effectiveness of body armor as a means to ban private ammunition commerce? Plus, those pesky Citizens might want more effective better performing body armor and the loyalist pukes are still working on more body armor bans....
Post a Comment