Better bring a frigging army . . . and we'll still defeat you.
Police Wonder If They’ll Need To Confiscate Assault Weapons In Event Of Ban
Amid talk of reinstating the assault weapons ban that expired eight years ago, police departments nationwide are thinking of ways to confiscate such weapons.
As WCBS 880’s Marla Diamond reported, among the departments considering taking action is the NYPD. Police Commissioner Ray Kelly said if Congress were to reinstate the ban, police are wondering whether it will be their responsibility to confiscate them.
20 comments:
Deport British Citizen Piers Morgan
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/deport-british-citizen-piers-morgan-attacking-2nd-amendment/prfh5zHD
http://www.infowars.com/deport-piers-morgan-petition-reaching-goal/
- deadman
You got that right Mike.
From one who made the mistake of forgetting the past:
"And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward." — Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
If the author is truly correct, and departments "nation wide" are really considering this, they'll each take turns looking around the room to see who's stupid enough to go first.
Better bring two friggin' armies.
The local PoPo has M-4 carbines in their cruisers. My friends and I all have .308's, 30-06's and a few .50's. Who do you think has the advantage here?
http://www.infowars.com/exclusive-cops-detectives-fbi-agents-u-s-soldiers-tell-natural-news-they-will-not-enforce-gun-confiscation-orders/
The retired police captain told me that, “Door-to-door confiscation by men and women in blue [i.e. city cops] would be a suicide mission.” If ordered to conduct such gun confiscation actions, many would simply resign on the spot rather than risk their lives in firefights with determined gun owners, he explained. “Our officers are not generally willing to assume the increased risk of such a police action.”
The locals and state agencies should leave confiscation to the Feds. In my state, there is no doubt the Pennsylvania State Police WILL get involved, as they are attached at the hip with the FEDS out of the Fusion Center in Pittsburgh. Due to the fiscal situation in Pennsylvania, PSP can ill afford the resources and assets necessary to go on a campaign of confiscation, but they will anyway. Serial liars and neo-nazi's, everyone of them. Gonna get ugly if the reports are true.
Contract negotiations with Brightfire are probably already underway.
LMAO !!
That nazi shitbird Kelly and his goons who shot bystanders in NYC..
Better get UN troops since them lowlifes love them so much..
Remember the rule, kill them then kill the ones who sent them until you run out.
Yank lll
Personally, I will shoot any law enforcement officer who comes to my door, after decades of being too cowardly to go door to door in the obama ghettos.
How many New Orleans cops resigned rather than take guns during and after Katrina?
Don't be so hard on old Ray Kelly. New Yorkers like him have their heads so far up their asses that they simply can't see us.
If such a confiscation law passes, it will be a Federal law. Let the Federal agencies handle it. The locals and staties need to NOT be the front man patsies.
B Woodman
III-PER
GaryM said...
"How many New Orleans cops resigned rather than take guns during and after Katrina?"
Resigned? None that I know of.
The ones who "deserted" were mostly those who were illegally on the payroll but were never actually on the force.
Get to know your Sheriff now. Find out whether he is a Constitutional Sheriff dedicated to upholding his oath, or not. http://cspoa.org/
Ray Kelly is the epitome of the NY gangster cop.. wannabe tough guy, union scumbag, politically corrupt enough to keep his job.. power is his high and he sucks Bloomies ass just right.
He's an embarrassment to NY.
Yank lll
Well I Know where I am going to get my Assault weapon Lowers from if I live.
Dear cops and feds,
Since I know you read Mike's blog, consider that many of you will be saying goodbye to your wives and kids when you make the stupid mistake of enforcing a weapons confiscation. Sure, the first attempts will be easy for you. But, when the word spreads, it will be a slaughter on your fellow Law Enforcement Anything Officers.
And... I can only imagine that when you take out a whole family, by mistake of course... that quite a few individuals will return your mistakes in kind.
So... I would suggest that you discuss this with your families and all the scenarios that will go wrong for you.
Best wishes.
Really??? Are these the law-abiding citizens that we are supposed to trust with guns?? I doubt it. Australia recently bought back more than 600,000 firearms after tightening gun control after a mass shooting. No more mass shootings. The writers of the above comments have revealed what kind of people they are, and they are definitely not to be trusted with firearms. I say stop making and selling them, vacuum up all the guns currently in circulation, and make it a serious offence to possess one. It'll take a long time, but eventually their numbers in circulation will diminish, and thereafter the USA can enjoy the kind of low gun-crime rates that civilized countries do.
" Australia recently bought back more than 600,000 firearms after tightening gun control after a mass shooting. No more mass shootings."
What they don't tell you is there were no mass shootings BEFORE the one that caused this knee jerk reaction.. What will they 'buy back' after the 'next' shooting? And their 'will' be a next shooting.
Post a Comment