And of course, the "Times" continues to use the words "sting" and "botched" without even a hint of the deeper purpose of the whole thing. And, of course, no hint of those who initially brought this disaster to the attention of congress.
But I guess such reporting is better than a stick in the eye...
Strong words from the Times, but I have to wonder how much impact the symbolic vote in congress, to deny funds for lying, will have on Holder. If he draws on his past, when he weathered the Marc Rich scandal, we may see the GOP leadership cave instead. Interesting times!
3 comments:
But THAT would require GOP leadership in the house to grow BOTH a spine AND a pair of balls!!
Ain't happenin'.
Nope!
AIN'T HAPPENIN'!!!
And of course, the "Times" continues to use the words "sting" and "botched" without even a hint of the deeper purpose of the whole thing. And, of course, no hint of those who initially brought this disaster to the attention of congress.
But I guess such reporting is better than a stick in the eye...
Strong words from the Times, but I have to wonder how much impact the symbolic vote in congress, to deny funds for lying, will have on Holder. If he draws on his past, when he weathered the Marc Rich scandal, we may see the GOP leadership cave instead. Interesting times!
Post a Comment