What Part of "Shall NOT be Infringed" Do You NOT Understand?

Submitted by Bill St. Clair on Mon, 24 Mar 2008 09:11:25 GMT  <== RKBA ==> 

Dennis Wilson at The Libertarian Enterprise - Mr. Wilson reminds us that the reason the Second Amendment says "shall not be infringed", not "shall not be unreasonably infringed" is because it is there to inhibit exactly the tyrants who would love to decide which infringements are "reasonable". He also provided a nice, public-domain, image, which you can buy imprinted on stuff or print yourself.

Which part of 'shall NOT be Infringed' do you NOT understand

Add comment Edit post Add post