NavigationBanners
Active forum topicsRecent blog postsUser loginWho's new
Who's onlineThere are currently 0 users and 1382 guests online.
|
A REAL Intrusion (Alaska)Submitted by Kenneth on Sat, 2008-02-16 14:16.
Sen. Bill Wielechowski "It is the beginning of a surveillance society,", "It's very easy to see where this goes.", "If the federal government ... wishes to create a society that really is big brother, we don't want to pay for it,". I'm not sure whether or not to applaud or grab a pitchfork. But it would seem that the senator is merely trying to get the federal government to pony up the money for this. On the other hand it would seem as if the senator understands what national i.d. cards are really for. I dunno, I'll let you decide. But, lets give them Alaskan's a telephone call or an email. I'm not sure which 2 senators are current. I filled in with what i could find just to be safe. Senator Ted Stevens Senator Bill Wielechowski Senator Lisa Murkowski Rep Don Young ( categories: Politics )
|
BlogrollFirearm NewsQuotesEvery man, woman, and responsible child has an unalienable individual, civil, Constitutional, and human right to obtain, own, and carry, openly or concealed, any weapon -- rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- any time, any place, without asking anyone's permission. -- L. Neil Smith Reread that pesky first clause of the Second Amendment. It doesn't say what any of us thought it said. What it says is that infringing the right of the people to keep and bear arms is treason. What else do you call an act that endangers "the security of a free state"? And if it's treason, then it's punishable by death. I suggest due process, speedy trials, and public hangings. -- L. Neil Smith Based on 253 journal articles, 99 books, 43 government publications, and some of its own empirical work, the panel couldn't identify a single gun control regulation that reduced violent crime, suicide or accidents. -- John Lott, commenting on the National Academy of Sciences report (PDF) on gun control laws Zero Aggression Principle ("Zap") "A libertarian is a person who believes that no one has the right, under any circumstances, to initiate force against another human being, or to advocate or delegate its initiation. Those who act consistently with this principle are libertarians, whether they realize it or not. Those who fail to act consistently with it are not libertarians, regardless of what they may claim." -- L. Neil Smith Formerly called the "Non-Aggression Principle", or "NAP" The state can only survive as long as a majority is programmed to believe that theft isn't wrong if it's called taxation or asset forfeiture or eminent domain, that assault and kidnapping isn't wrong if it's called arrest, that mass murder isn't wrong if it's called war. -- Bill St. Clair TTLB |
Recent comments
16 hours 8 min ago
4 days 12 hours ago
4 days 12 hours ago
6 days 31 min ago
6 days 41 min ago
1 week 6 days ago
2 weeks 5 days ago
2 weeks 6 days ago
3 weeks 3 days ago
3 weeks 3 days ago