NavigationBanners![]()
Active forum topicsRecent blog postsUser loginWho's new
Who's onlineThere are currently 1 user and 600 guests online.
Online users:
|
Up against the wall! And thanks for cooperating.Submitted by Bill St. Clair on Tue, 2006-05-02 10:57.
Jim Peron at The Institute for Liberal Values - Mr. Peron had to travel into and back out of Amerika recently. He won't happily do so again. [clairefiles] I have tried to avoid air travel in the United States ever since the Feds took over "security" which means they harass hundreds of millions of passengers a year and act like mini Nazis. On my most recent flight into the US I actually decided to travel via Mexico just to avoid US air space. I drove into the US and then took a bus for the last leg of my journey. But even the bus was stopped by federal agents who demanded that everyone aboard provide "papers please."
There may be no law mandating an internal passport for the United States but what does not exist de jure does exist de facto. Americans are now among the least free people when it comes to travel. One can not drive without a license which one is mandated to carry on their person. The Feds are there to make it virtually impossible for one to fly without ID as well. Interstate bus trips are stopped by federal agents who demand ID from passengers. Even commuters on local buses have been hauled off for not providing ID to demanding federal agents. Freedom to travel is gone without a document from the Feds. "Small government" conservatives are the ones who brought this about. ... Now I can only hope that this last flight through the US is my last. If I were a praying person that would be high on my list. I don't want to endure the US Travel Gestapo ever again. To all those tourists the world over I merely point out that we have a vast, fascinating world and in most places you won't be mistreated the way you are by the US bureaucrats. Give the US a miss. As for my fellow Americans: I can understand why you might fly out. I just can't comprehend why you go back. add new comment | quote | 1266 reads
( categories: Politics )
|
BlogrollMike VanderboeghQuotesEvery man, woman, and responsible child has an unalienable individual, civil, Constitutional, and human right to obtain, own, and carry, openly or concealed, any weapon -- rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- any time, any place, without asking anyone's permission. -- L. Neil Smith Reread that pesky first clause of the Second Amendment. It doesn't say what any of us thought it said. What it says is that infringing the right of the people to keep and bear arms is treason. What else do you call an act that endangers "the security of a free state"? And if it's treason, then it's punishable by death. I suggest due process, speedy trials, and public hangings. -- L. Neil Smith Based on 253 journal articles, 99 books, 43 government publications, and some of its own empirical work, the panel couldn't identify a single gun control regulation that reduced violent crime, suicide or accidents. -- John Lott, commenting on the National Academy of Sciences report (PDF) on gun control laws Zero Aggression Principle ("Zap") "A libertarian is a person who believes that no one has the right, under any circumstances, to initiate force against another human being, or to advocate or delegate its initiation. Those who act consistently with this principle are libertarians, whether they realize it or not. Those who fail to act consistently with it are not libertarians, regardless of what they may claim." -- L. Neil Smith Formerly called the "Non-Aggression Principle", or "NAP" Why Did It Have to be... Guns? Make no mistake: all politicians -- even those ostensibly on the side of guns and gun ownership -- hate the issue and anyone, like me, who insists on bringing it up. They hate it because it's an X-ray machine. It's a Vulcan mind-meld. It's the ultimate test to which any politician -- or political philosophy -- can be put. If a politician isn't perfectly comfortable with the idea of his average constituent, any man, woman, or responsible child, walking into a hardware store and paying cash -- for any rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- without producing ID or signing one scrap of paper, he isn't your friend no matter what he tells you. If he isn't genuinely enthusiastic about his average constituent stuffing that weapon into a purse or pocket or tucking it under a coat and walking home without asking anybody's permission, he's a four-flusher, no matter what he claims. What his attitude -- toward your ownership and use of weapons -- conveys is his real attitude about you. And if he doesn't trust you, then why in the name of John Moses Browning should you trust him? -- L. Neil Smith "Tell me," I was once asked, "What do you think about gun control? Give me the short answer." To which I replied, "If you try to take our firearms we will kill you." -- Mike Vanderboegh Also from The Atlanta Declaration: ... like going to the bathroom, breathing, eating, sleeping, or making love, it turns out that self-defense is a bodily function one cannot safely or effectively delegate to a second party. -- L. Neil Smith This does not mean that "Marijuana should be available by prescription." It means that morphine sulfate should be available in five pound bags at the supermarket for a couple of bucks, like sugar... but probably in a different aisle, to avoid confusion. -- Vin Suprynowicz The state can only survive as long as a majority is programmed to believe that theft isn't wrong if it's called taxation or asset forfeiture or eminent domain, that assault and kidnapping isn't wrong if it's called arrest, that mass murder isn't wrong if it's called war. -- Bill St. Clair TTLB |
Recent comments
1 day 30 min ago
1 week 2 days ago
1 week 3 days ago
1 week 4 days ago
1 week 4 days ago
1 week 5 days ago
1 week 5 days ago
1 week 5 days ago
1 week 5 days ago
1 week 5 days ago