NavigationBanners
Active forum topicsRecent blog postsUser loginWho's new
Who's onlineThere are currently 0 users and 820 guests online.
|
An Unwinnable War on DrugsSubmitted by Bill St. Clair on Fri, 2003-01-31 03:26.
to: letters@nytimes.com
cc: bill@billstclair.com bcc: MGreer@mapinc.org Subject: An Unwinnable War on Drugs Date: 27 April, 2001 Seeing Ethan Nadelmann's article, "An Unwinnable War on Drugs", in the Times was a sight for sore eyes. Is the Times finally getting a clue about the war on freedom, er... some drugs? That's right. The war on some drugs has nothing to do with drugs. It is a war on freedom, a war on the bill of rights, a war on America's soul. And now this war is responsible for the murder of an American missionary and her baby. That's right. Murder. And who is responsible for this murder? Well, a Peruvian pilot pulled the trigger, but some American congress members are equally as responsible. Everyone who had a part in encouraging Peru to shoot down airplanes is guilty of conspiracy to commit murder. When will the trials begin? As a libertarian, I believe that no one has the right, under any circumstances, to initiate force against another human being, or to advocate or delegate its initiation. Those who do so are criminals. Every time a drug war law is passed, the congress members who vote for it advocate the initiation of force. Every time police arrest someone for the non-crime of selling or possessing drugs, they initiate force. Drug buyers and sellers engage in voluntary commerce. Neither initiates force. The criminals here are the drug warriors. They are guilty of assault and kidnapping or conspiracy to commit assault and kidnapping. That's right. Assault and kidnapping. When will the trials begin?
Bill St. Clair add new comment | quote | 1006 reads
|
BlogrollFirearm NewsQuotesEvery man, woman, and responsible child has an unalienable individual, civil, Constitutional, and human right to obtain, own, and carry, openly or concealed, any weapon -- rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- any time, any place, without asking anyone's permission. -- L. Neil Smith Reread that pesky first clause of the Second Amendment. It doesn't say what any of us thought it said. What it says is that infringing the right of the people to keep and bear arms is treason. What else do you call an act that endangers "the security of a free state"? And if it's treason, then it's punishable by death. I suggest due process, speedy trials, and public hangings. -- L. Neil Smith Based on 253 journal articles, 99 books, 43 government publications, and some of its own empirical work, the panel couldn't identify a single gun control regulation that reduced violent crime, suicide or accidents. -- John Lott, commenting on the National Academy of Sciences report (PDF) on gun control laws Zero Aggression Principle ("Zap") "A libertarian is a person who believes that no one has the right, under any circumstances, to initiate force against another human being, or to advocate or delegate its initiation. Those who act consistently with this principle are libertarians, whether they realize it or not. Those who fail to act consistently with it are not libertarians, regardless of what they may claim." -- L. Neil Smith Formerly called the "Non-Aggression Principle", or "NAP" The state can only survive as long as a majority is programmed to believe that theft isn't wrong if it's called taxation or asset forfeiture or eminent domain, that assault and kidnapping isn't wrong if it's called arrest, that mass murder isn't wrong if it's called war. -- Bill St. Clair TTLB |
Recent comments
3 days 11 hours ago
1 week 8 hours ago
1 week 8 hours ago
1 week 1 day ago
1 week 1 day ago
2 weeks 2 days ago
3 weeks 1 day ago
3 weeks 2 days ago
3 weeks 6 days ago
3 weeks 6 days ago