"If each of us carried a gun . . "

Submitted by Bill St. Clair on Tue, 09 Dec 2008 13:08:15 GMT  <== RKBA ==> 

Richard Munday via Mike Vanderboegh - two versions of an essay that ran on Sunday in the Times of London. In the light of the Mumbai massacre, it should be obvious to everyone that gun bans disarm only the law-abiding.

Rhetoric about standing firm against terrorists aside, in Britain we have no more legal deterrent to prevent an armed assault than did the people of Bombay, and individually we would be just as helpless as victims. The Bombay massacre could happen in London tomorrow; but probably it could not have happened to the Londoners of a hundred years ago.

A century ago the challenge of radical Islam to the British Empire was beyond these shores, but we also faced threats at home from Fenian terrorists and assorted 'anarchists'. Almost exactly one hundred years ago, in January 1909, two such anarchists, lately come from an attempt to blow up the president of France, tried to commit a robbery in north London, armed with automatic pistols. Edwardian Londoners, however, shot back: and the anarchists were pursued through the streets by a spontaneous hue-and-cry. The police (who could not find the key to their own gun cupboard) borrowed at least four pistols from passers-by, whilst other citizens armed with revolvers and shotguns preferred to use their weapons themselves to bring the assailants down.

Add comment Edit post Add post