NavigationBanners![]()
Active forum topicsRecent blog postsUser loginWho's new
Who's onlineThere are currently 1 user and 675 guests online.
Online users:
|
Stop CooperatingSubmitted by Bill St. Clair on Thu, 2005-11-03 08:00.
From
this Claire Files post:
"We aren't going to get anywhere. Individuals are going to get there. One at a time they will realize that politics, that the state, that the concept of a group of people, no matter how large, having any control whatsoever over the peaceful choices of another group of people, no matter how small, is wrong. And they will stop cooperating with it. They will stop paying taxes. They will stop voting. They will stop obeying police officers. They will stop submitting to registration or licensing of any kind. They will completely ignore all legislation. And they will start shooting and stabbing and hanging and otherwise eliminating anyone and everyone they can't avoid who attempts to control them." -- Bill St. Clair From clairefiles: "If we stuck to the Constitution as written, we would have: no federal meddling in our schools; no Federal Reserve; no U.S. membership in the UN; no gun control; and no foreign aid. We would have no welfare for big corporations, or the 'poor'; no American troops in 100 foreign countries; no NAFTA, GATT, or 'fast-track'; no arrogant federal judges usurping states rights; no attacks on private property; no income tax . We could get rid of most of the cabinet departments, most of the agencies, and most of the budget. The government would be small, frugal, and limited." -- Ron Paul (1998) # Claire Wolfe at Backwoods Home Magazine - The Hardy Awards 2005 - Claire, Wally Conger, and Oliver del Signore counted the votes and awarded the trophies. [claire] # Claire Wolfe - Dear Free State Project - Claire declares that she will not move to New Hampshire unless the original goal of 20,000 participants is reached by September of 2006. Jason Sorens replied via a Claire Files Forums post. [claire] # National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) - Denver Votes To Abolish Pot Penalties - by 54%. Teluride voted down (by 24 votes) a similar initiative to make enforcing marijuana prohibition the lowest law enforcement priority. # Andrew S. Fischer at LewRockwell.com - Arrested for What? - there used to be a time when arresting someone for having an arbitrarily set blood-alcohol level would be illegal. The drunk driver hasn't actually done anything wrong yet. Yes, he might do something wrong, but until he does, no crime has been committed and his actions are nobody's business. Now if the cop actually witnesses bad driving, that's another thing. Unsafe driving is an initiation of force for whatever reason the driver is doing it, too much to drink, too little sleep, too little intelligence, argument with wife or kids, too much attention on cell phone call, etc. etc. But criminalizing activities that might cause unsafe driving or unsafe anything is just plain wrong. Like gun "control", it's blaming the tool instead of its user. [lew] Seems to me that either you can arrest someone before he does something, or you can't. If you buy into the former case, then what are the limits? add new comment | quote | 1390 reads
|
BlogrollMike Vanderboegh
QuotesEvery man, woman, and responsible child has an unalienable individual, civil, Constitutional, and human right to obtain, own, and carry, openly or concealed, any weapon -- rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- any time, any place, without asking anyone's permission. -- L. Neil Smith Reread that pesky first clause of the Second Amendment. It doesn't say what any of us thought it said. What it says is that infringing the right of the people to keep and bear arms is treason. What else do you call an act that endangers "the security of a free state"? And if it's treason, then it's punishable by death. I suggest due process, speedy trials, and public hangings. -- L. Neil Smith Based on 253 journal articles, 99 books, 43 government publications, and some of its own empirical work, the panel couldn't identify a single gun control regulation that reduced violent crime, suicide or accidents. -- John Lott, commenting on the National Academy of Sciences report (PDF) on gun control laws Zero Aggression Principle ("Zap") "A libertarian is a person who believes that no one has the right, under any circumstances, to initiate force against another human being, or to advocate or delegate its initiation. Those who act consistently with this principle are libertarians, whether they realize it or not. Those who fail to act consistently with it are not libertarians, regardless of what they may claim." -- L. Neil Smith Formerly called the "Non-Aggression Principle", or "NAP" Why Did It Have to be... Guns? Make no mistake: all politicians -- even those ostensibly on the side of guns and gun ownership -- hate the issue and anyone, like me, who insists on bringing it up. They hate it because it's an X-ray machine. It's a Vulcan mind-meld. It's the ultimate test to which any politician -- or political philosophy -- can be put. If a politician isn't perfectly comfortable with the idea of his average constituent, any man, woman, or responsible child, walking into a hardware store and paying cash -- for any rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- without producing ID or signing one scrap of paper, he isn't your friend no matter what he tells you. If he isn't genuinely enthusiastic about his average constituent stuffing that weapon into a purse or pocket or tucking it under a coat and walking home without asking anybody's permission, he's a four-flusher, no matter what he claims. What his attitude -- toward your ownership and use of weapons -- conveys is his real attitude about you. And if he doesn't trust you, then why in the name of John Moses Browning should you trust him? -- L. Neil Smith "Tell me," I was once asked, "What do you think about gun control? Give me the short answer." To which I replied, "If you try to take our firearms we will kill you." -- Mike Vanderboegh Also from The Atlanta Declaration: ... like going to the bathroom, breathing, eating, sleeping, or making love, it turns out that self-defense is a bodily function one cannot safely or effectively delegate to a second party. -- L. Neil Smith This does not mean that "Marijuana should be available by prescription." It means that morphine sulfate should be available in five pound bags at the supermarket for a couple of bucks, like sugar... but probably in a different aisle, to avoid confusion. -- Vin Suprynowicz The state can only survive as long as a majority is programmed to believe that theft isn't wrong if it's called taxation or asset forfeiture or eminent domain, that assault and kidnapping isn't wrong if it's called arrest, that mass murder isn't wrong if it's called war. -- Bill St. Clair TTLB |
Recent comments
2 hours 52 min ago
5 hours 34 min ago
5 days 22 hours ago
5 days 22 hours ago
1 week 3 hours ago
1 week 2 days ago
1 week 3 days ago
1 week 4 days ago
1 week 4 days ago
1 week 5 days ago