Dear Jed,

The researcher who replicated the MEG was Jean-Louis Naudin in France.  He

obtained COP = 7.3 in his later (third) build-up after an initial success of

COP = 1.3.  We have obtained COP = 17 to 20, higher in some experimental

build-ups, and we deliberately pushed one unit to destruction of the output

coil, with the unit reaching COP>100 just before the arc-over and

destruction of the coils.

At the request of our patent attorneys and the university, we are keeping

close the name of the university until their report is completed.  But yes,

arrangements have been made for the university's scientific team to not only

test it, but to physically and independently replicate it from scratch,

under U.S. Department of Defense auspices (the university team works on a

DoD program in power supplies).  The university scientists will build-up the

replication to our specifications, but they will order the parts, wind the

coils, make the assembly,  and produce everything completely independently

from Magnetics Energy Limited, to which the intellectual property rights are

assigned.

We are also arranging for independent testing by a government-certified

private testing laboratory with an international reputation and with

impeccable credentials (many of the large aerospace industries use this

laboratory for certification testing on a great variety of U.S. government

contracts).  After observing the fierce dogmatic hassle that the orthodox

establishment poured on cold fusion and on the institutes and scientists

involved, you can understand why we are not releasing which university,

which DoD agency, and which independent test laboratory.  We are striving to

do straightforward scientific work for review by openminded scientists, not

by dogmatists.

There are five persons who in combined effort invented the motionless

electromagnetic generator (MEG).  Beside myself they are Dr. Jim Hayes, Dr.

Lee Kenny, engineer Ken Moore, and engineer Steve Patrick.  These latter

four researchers have worked very long and hard on this project, which

succeeded only after nearly a decade of effort.

As soon as we have these independent tests completed and the independent

university replication completed and tested, we will have presented the

scientific community with a validated, replicated experimental unit forever

proving that electrical power systems with COP>1.0 are not only possible but

feasible and practical.  In short, if the present conventional theory

disagrees with the MEG experiment once the experiment is independently

validated and replicated, then it is the present conventional theory which

must be changed, if one follows prescribed scientific method.

To understand how straightforward it is to extract EM energy from the

vacuum, I suggest that my several papers on Department of Energy website

http://www.ott.doe.gov/electromagnetic/papersbooks.html be downloaded and

read, particularly the paper "Giant Negentropy from the Common Dipole"-which

has also just been published in Journal of New Energy.  One should also read

my paper on the DoE website on "The Unnecessary Energy Crisis" in order to

understand that all the hydrocarbons ever burned, dams ever built to power

hydroturbines to turn the shafts of the generators, and nuclear fuel rods

ever expended, have not added and will never add a single watt to the power

line.  All that ferocious destruction of the biosphere has done nothing but

force the internal charges of the generators apart, to make the source

dipoles.  It is the source dipole that powers every electrical circuit and

every power system, not the shaft horsepower input to the generator shaft.

Isn't it strange that we have all been taught to design and build only

closed current loop circuits-which a priori destroy their source dipoles

(and thus the inflow of free electrical energy from the vacuum) faster than

they can catch some of the free energy from the vacuum and use it to power

their loads!  Until it is understood that all EM energy comes from the

vacuum anyway, and specifically from the time domain as reactive power

(electrical engineering term), then the operation of systems such as the MEG

will make no sense to one at all, and in fact the mechanism actually

powering every EM circuit and electrical power system will not be

understood.

I have promised Hal Fox to prepare an article for Journal of New Energy,

describing the MEG and its general mechanism for operation, as soon as the

independent testing and independent university's full replication are

completed.

Also, Dr. Myron Evans, a theoretician of much note, has completed an AIAS

scientific paper which provides a succinct and rigorous technical exposition

in O(3) electrodynamics of the MEG's "energy from the vacuum" operational

mechanism.  Evans demonstrates that the explanation does not appear at all

in the standard U(1) electrodynamics, but does easily appear rather

straightforwardly in the higher symmetry O(3) electrodynamics, which is a

non-Abelian EM theory.  That AIAS paper has been submitted to a leading

physics journal and is presently in formal referee review.

We briefed technical representatives of two U.S. Senate committees on the

MEG and on overunity electrical power systems in general as part of our

briefing (along with excellent briefings by Dr. Eugene Mallove, Dr. Tom

Valone, Dr. Ted Loder, and others) and will brief again-more widely in the

Senate and on Capital Hill-sometime next spring or early summer.  At the

next briefing, we will probably include a live demonstration of the MEG.

Both here and abroad, we are actively seeking capitalization by licensing

the non-exclusive manufacturing of scaled up MEG power units, while

retaining control of our fundamental invention.  In the not too distant

future, we will scale up the MEG and see it manufactured by various

licensees worldwide, with units going directly to the market place  as real

power systems powering real loads.

The Managing Partner and Director of Magnetic Energy Limited is Dr. Lee

Kenny, E-mail jlkenny@lbtrltd.com.  Lee should be contacted for all matters

regarding the MEG program, program status, plans, investments, company

information, etc. and for any further questions.

Very best wishes,

Tom Bearden