|Survivor: Cathy Woods, following her exoneration.|
Former police detective John Lawrence Kimpton had crested the biblical threescore-and-ten in 2011 when he passed away in the company of loved ones in a Reno hospital room. He should have died in the prison cell that by that time been occupied for more than thirty years by Cathy Woods, an innocent woman whom he had helped frame for murder. In 2015, after DNA evidence cleared Woods of the murder, she was released from prison. She was 66 years old, and her entire adult life had been stolen by Kimpton and his accomplices.
In a society actually ruled by law, the perpetrators responsible for that crime – Kimpton, former Reno PD Lieutenant Lawrence C. Dennison, former Shreveport, Louisiana detectives Donald W. Ashley and Clarence A. Lewis, and prosecutor Calvin Dunlap – would be compelled to serve out the balance of their victim’s unjust prison sentence. That would validate the principle of equal justice, if we accept the dubious idea that confining someone in a government cage is a suitable way to achieve restitution for a violent crime. A better arrangement would be to compel them to serve out their days as indentured servants to the woman whose life they destroyed.
In the world that is too much with us, however, the most urgent priority of the “justice” system is to insulate abusive officials from accountability for their crimes against the innocent. Thus it was that when Washoe County District Attorney Chris Hicks and incumbent Reno Deputy Police Chief Mac Venzon grudgingly announced in March 2015 that Woods was “no longer a suspect,” they graciously excused the criminal actions of the people who had wrongfully imprisoned Woods, while demanding praise for the “system” that yielded such an outcome.
|Deputy Chief Venzon (close enough for our "system").|
In the system as it exists – as opposed to the one that is advertised – one key function of the jury is to act as a human shield for police officers and prosecutors in cases of wrongful conviction.
Hicks was similarly indulgent toward the men who had preyed on Woods with calculated indifference to the truth.
“I do not fault the law enforcement involved in the original investigation, the prosecution or the two juries that found Cathy Woods guilty,” warbled Hicks. “They were faced with a vicious and tragic unsolved murder and were presented with details of intentional confessions from a person who resided in the area at the time of the murder.” Besides, he continued, in 1979 the investigating officers “did not have the incredible tool of DNA.”
Hicks is a prosecutor, which means that deliberate dishonesty is a well-worn implement in his professional toolkit. As we will see anon, he lied in claiming that Woods had offered “intentional confessions” regarding the 1976 murder of 19-year-old Michelle Mitchell. Furthermore, the ability to use DNA evidence would have been useful only if the functionaries who framed Woods had been seeking to solve a crime. That wasn’t their objective: They were only interested in clearing a case, and this was made possible by the sudden availability of a vulnerable, suggestible victim.
Mitchell’s body had been found in a garage near the campus of the University of Nevada-Reno. Her hands had been bound, her throat had been cut, and there were indications that the crime had been committed by a sexual predator. A cigarette had been discarded near the victim’s body, and the footprint of a man’s size-nine shoe was also found in the garage where the murder occurred. A suspicious-looking man was observed near the scene by several witnesses, one of whom reported that he appeared to have blood on his hands.
At the time of the murder, Woods lived in Reno not far from the scene of the crime. Three years later, as public frustration grew over Mitchell’s unsolved murder, Woods came to the attention of police in Shreveport, Louisiana, where she had been involuntarily committed to a psychiatric hospital. Diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia, Woods was afflicted with persistent auditory hallucinations and incapable of sustaining a linear conversation.
|Hey, don't blame the system! Washoe County DA Hicks.|
For reasons incomprehensible to a rational person, Sherman chose to treat this as a quasi-confession, rather than recognizing this as something that bobbed to the surface during a borderline-aphasic monologue by a patient prone to severe psychosis. She called Detective Ashley, who in turn got in touch with Kimpton and Dennison in Reno.
There was no sense in which Woods remotely resembled the physical description of the suspect. She was a short, dark-haired woman, rather than a stocky, sandy-haired man nearly six feet tall. Her shoes were several sizes smaller than the footprint found on the murder scene. She was severely symptomatic and obviously unable to respond competently to the questions posed to her. None of this mattered to the police detectives.
Dispensing with any pretense that they were interested in following the evidence to the actual killer, they relentlessly interrogated their delusional captive, carefully feeding her details of the case and prompting her to say something that could be construed as a confession. At the beginning of the ordeal, Woods made it clear that she had no personal knowledge of the crime. Undeterred, the detectives insisted that she did, and made it clear that they would not release her until she cooperated by confirming that claim.
|Woods at the time of her first trial.|
On the second day, Woods – who by this time had some understanding of what her captors were doing – told one of her attending physicians, Dr. Linda Boswell, that she wanted an attorney. The officers broke the law by denying her that right, assuring her that an attorney would simply prolong the unpleasant experience.
At one point she pleaded to be relocated to safer quarters at the hospital. She was told that request would be granted only if she could prove that she was “dangerous.” At some point thereafter, Woods allegedly said that she murdered Michelle Mitchell in obedience to a “satanic voice.” She also asserted that she worked for the FBI, a claim much more plausible than her confession.
It is very likely that Woods never offered a confession of any kind. The detectives spared no effort to avoid making a contemporaneous, objective record of the interrogation. Tape recorders were available, but none was used to document the sessions, and no notes were taken at the time. Woods did not write a confession, nor was she asked to sign one. It wasn’t until several days later that the detectives bothered to commit their fiction to print.
At the time, the Washoe County DA was an ambitious young lawyer named Cal Dunlap. During subsequent decades, as Woods was trying to survive her term within the Regime’s rape factory, Dunlap would build a lucrative career as a celebrity trial attorney who appears to have a gift for exploiting psychologically unbalanced women. The murder conviction of Cathy Woods was Dunlap’s first professional success.
There were no eyewitnesses to the murder, and Woods obviously wasn’t the suspicious male who had been seen at the location of the crime shortly after the killing took place. She just as obviously did not make the male size-nine footprint found near Mitchell’s body. Her defense attorney pointed out that the only way Woods could have been responsible for that footprint is if she unaccountably decided to commit the crime while wearing “clown shoes.”
No physical or other direct evidence connected Woods to the murder, and there was the added complication that the police had been looking for a man suspected in a string of similar murders in nearby northern California. All Dunlap had in his arsenal was a palpably implausible confession from a visibly disturbed woman – and his own inexhaustible cynicism.
Few things are deadlier than a prosecutor unburdened by scruples and blessed with a credulous jury. Dunlap devised a theory of the crime that played to prurient interests: Woods was depicted as a lesbian who killed the frail, blonde-haired Mitchell after the 19-year-old rejected her sexual advances. Describing Woods as a spurned and vengeful lesbian “was part of their way to try and explain away the fact that they had been looking for a man,” appellate attorney Elizabeth Wang would later observe.
This was enough to win a conviction from the trial jury. Woods was granted a new trial in 1985 after a Nevada appeals court ruled that the trial judge had improperly suppressed potentially exculpatory testimony. The second jury also convicted Woods, this time because her “confession” was riddled with details that only the true killer would know. Those details were inserted in the narrative by the detectives who composed that work of fiction.
Shortly after Woods was taken back to prison, the man who actually killed Mitchell escaped. Rodney Halbower, who had been convicted of robbery and attempted murder, freed himself long enough to stab a woman in a parking lot. After being recaptured, Halbower was convicted of an additional charge of attempted murder.
In 2011, Halbower was compelled to undergo a DNA test before a prison transfer. This development occurred at roughly the same time that former Detective Kimpton – who was eulogized as a man of principle and piety – departed this life for whatever destination awaits the souls of impenitent perjurers and kidnapers.
Two years later, after Woods – with the help of a fellow inmate – filed a motion for post-conviction relief, a DNA test on the cigarette that had been discarded next to Mitchell’s body was found to match Halbower. He has now been charged with that killing and at least two others. This was one of an ever-growing number of cases in which a murder was solved only because of the persistence of an innocent person who had spent years in prison for the crimes of others – both the original offender, and the corrupt functionaries who engineered the wrongful conviction.
Cathy Woods survived what was, in essence, a protracted murder attempt. The men who framed her were aware that a prison term would probably kill her. She survived three decades of imprisonment that were punctuated with potentially lethal violence, a suicide attempt, and electroshock “therapy.”
Since those responsible for her suffering are protected by the legal fiction called “qualified immunity,” Woods has filed a civil rights lawsuit that will most likely result in a subsidized seven-figure settlement – assuming that she lives long enough to collect.
Kimpton is beyond mortal punishment, but his co-conspirators are still among the living. A legal system actually devoted to justice would require that they spend the rest of their lives confined in the cell to which they had consigned Cathy Woods nearly four decades ago. Regrettably, that option isn’t available in what Reno PD Chief Venzon smugly described as “the best system in the world.”
This week's Freedom Zealot Podcast
Former Adams County Sheriff's Deputy Brian Wood, who along with former colleague Cody Roland, killed rancher Jack Yantis -- is now a "Gypsy Cop" -- which makes him a menace to the public at large, rather than just the residents of Adams County:
If you can, please contribute to help keep Pro Libertate online. Thank you so much!
Dum spiro, pugno!
Not sure qualified immunity extends to protection from willful forgery or manufacturing of evidence, fyi. If admissible evidence of those facts come up, almost certain the QI defense won't exist. Here's hoping for some "restorative justice." Good writing.
That should mean the death penalty for the corrupt filth with law licenses who act as assassins for the state.
those with power and without a conscience are shown, again, to be the most dangerous among us. sadly, this is what has become of us with our tolerance and, therefore, support.
Lets take this to a different angle on just how wrong the whole criminal justice system is. Cathy Woods is not out of the thick of it and never will be because the FBI will have a file on her that any LE person can get that states she has been charged and convicted of murder. This in fact is what the FBI does in keeping and share records of innocent people that had been unlucky to have crooked cops and government lawyers charge them with crimes that they did not commit. The judge dismisses the charges but the FBI keeps the records and share them with any LE that wants them. This causes huge problems for crime victims of criminals in the "justice" system. These dishonest records need to be removed and destroyed by the FBI. But they are not and it take ten's of thousands of dollars for a victim of these records to retain a lawyer and go to federal court to have them removed and they may not get them removed.
The pain of the criminals in the criminal justice system that are criminal cops and criminal government lawyers is something that never goes away. Proof by the FBI records of NCIC on innocent citizens is a demeanor of Us vs Them that taxes are paying for.
The demeanor is also the government employees attitude that if a person is charged they are guilty or the cops would never have charged them in the first place. In the 80's the AG of the US directly said that is the case.
while i think i understand the term, would you please define 'gypsy cop' so there will be no question in my mind as to what this term
i want to know where the 'gypsy cop' will be harassing and murdering citizens, as well.
Kirk, the expression "gypsy cop" refers to a costumed miscreant who has been fired for corrupt, abusive, or even unpunished criminal behavior, retains his "peace officer" certification, and migrates to another jurisdiction, where he finds a job.
Post a Comment