Stanley Gibson, a disabled Gulf War veteran, was murdered in a
Las Vegas parking lot last December 12. He was shot seven times in the back of
the head, without provocation, by a stranger wielding an AR-15 rifle. The
killer, 34-year-old Jesus Arevalo, remains at large and is easy to find:
He’s an officer with the Las Vegas Metro Police.
Gibson was unarmed. He was not a criminal suspect and posed
no threat to anybody. His killing was a clear and unmistakable case of criminal
homicide. Yet Arevalo has not been charged with a crime. He is on an extended
vacation called “administrative leave,” during which he continues to collect
his taxpayer-funded salary and benefits.
Meanwhile, Gibson’s widow, Rhonda, has been left all but penniless.
Her husband was a
fully disabled combat veteran of the first Gulf War who suffered from
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and cancer – the latter affliction most
likely a result of prolonged exposure to depleted uranium. Over the past
several years, Gibson’s disability benefits were consistently reduced and cut off entirely shortly before
he was murdered by Arevalo.
The day before he was shot, Gibson – whose anti-anxiety medication had
been cut off two weeks earlier by the Veterans Administration -- suffered a
breakdown. According
to Rhonda, “He didn’t know where he was and didn’t know what he was doing.”
The police were called after Stanley wound up in the front yard screaming at
cars and “causing a scene.” Claiming that Stanley had taken a “fighting stance,”
the officers arrested him for “resisting arrest” and booked him at the Las
Vegas Detention Center. Although they informed Rhonda that Stanley would be
placed on a 72-hour psychiatric hold, he was released within eight hours.
The following morning, Gibson called 911 twice to ask for
medical help. He eventually drove to a nearby hospital, but left without
receiving treatment. At about 9:30 that evening he called Rhonda to tell her he
was parked outside their apartment complex – but he was nowhere
to be seen.
Stanley had actually pulled into the parking lot of a condominium
next door. She wouldn't learn about what happened to her husband until seeing a news report of the shooting -- and recognizing his white Cadillac.
Eyewitnesses recalled that Gibson drove slowly through the lot as if he was lost
and confused. At the time, Arevalo and three other officers were at the condo responding to a call from a resident regarding a suspected break-in.
Although they had no reason to consider Gibson as a suspect, they surrounded
the vehicle and penned it in between several squad cars. Disoriented and
frightened, Gibson gunned his engine and spun his wheels—but there was nowhere
he could go.
For about a half hour, the officers tried to get Gibson to
leave the car. During that period they should have been able to run his license
plate and identify the driver. They should have recognized that they were
dealing with a sick and confused man, and contacted a crisis intervention team.
They should have gotten in touch with his wife, who lived less than a block
away. They should have simply waited for Gibson to calm
down.
The officers did none of those things. Instead, they chose
to escalate the encounter by devising a plan to force him from his car: One officer would shoot
out a window with a beanbag round, and another would incapacitate him with
pepper spray. After the window was shattered, Officer Jesus Arevalo modified the plan
by shooting Gibson seven times in the back of head with his AR-15 rifle.
Arevalo, who
has a lengthy history of citizen complaints and official reprimands, was given the customary 72 hours to work out his story with the help of a police union attorney. He was then placed on paid vacation. Clark County Sheriff Douglas Gillespie,
who supervises the Metro Police, initially claimed that the shooting was
justified because Gibson supposedly threatened the officers by using his car as
a “battering ram” – a claim that disintegrated after the emergence of a private
video documenting that Gibson’s car was stationary when Arevalo murdered him.
There is some unbearably sinister symmetry in the way
Stanley Gibson was murdered by agents of the Government. As a U.S. Army cook in
Kuwait, Gibson was assigned to clear away what remained of the tens of
thousands of Iraqis slaughtered in the “Highway of Death.”
During the First Gulf War, shortly after
Saddam Hussein announced
the complete withdrawal of his forces from Kuwait, U.S. and allied forces
attacked a convoy headed back into Iraq.
Following airstrikes that disabled vehicles at the front and rear
of the column, a prolonged assault with incendiary weapons and depleted uranium
rounds was undertaken. A sixty-mile stretch of highway was left littered with the hulls of about
2,000 vehicles and the charred remnants of tens of thousands of human beings --
helpless, retreating soldiers, as well as civilians who had been caught in the
traffic jam.
Gibson spent several days picking through the reeking rubble
and disposing of the dead. In one of the ruined vehicles he found the mortal
residue of a mother and child who had been melted together when their car was
struck by an incendiary bomb.
The exposure to depleted uranium rounds quite likely was responsible
for the cancer that forced Gibson to undergo a half-dozen operations and left his
face partially paralyzed. Immersion in the horrific aftermath of that atrocity irreparably
wounded Gibson’s mind and soul. He had no way of knowing that a little more
than twenty years later, armed agents of the same Government that had penned in
and slaughtered the helpless Iraqis would do exactly the same thing to him in a
Las Vegas parking lot.
Rhonda
Gibson blames the VA for the death of her husband. Originally classified as
100 percent disabled, Gibson had seen the VA arbitrarily re-classify him, alter
his diagnosis, and change his treatment regimen. Last October 24, during an
appointment at the local VA office, Gibson “aggressively confronted” an agency
doctor about the capricious cutbacks in his cancer treatment. He was arrested by
security officers and eventually pleaded guilty to “assaulting a federal
employee” – by raising his voice in frustration over the fact that the
government he had served was killing him through malicious neglect.
The couple’s financial situation worsened with each of the
agency’s reductions in benefits. In November 2011, the couple lost their home
and moved into an apartment next to the condominium where Gibson was killed. Now
that Stanley is gone, Rhonda is both emotionally devastated and financially
destitute.
Righteously furious over this state of affairs, Steven Sanson,
retired Marine and president of Veterans in Politics International, seeks to organize a
charity fundraiser: He has challenged Arevalo – who is a
former competitive amateur fighter -- to a refereed mixed martial arts match, with
most of the proceeds going to Gibson’s widow. Sanson hopes to hold the event on
12-12-12 – the anniversary of Stanley Gibson’s murder.
Arevalo, who was as bold as Hector when drawing a bead on the
back of an unarmed man’s head, has no appetite for throwing down with someone
who can actually fight back. There is no such thing as “qualified immunity” in
the Octagon; Arevalo wouldn’t be able to call for backup, nor would he be able
to press charges for “obstruction,” “disorderly conduct,” or “resisting
arrest.” The referee wouldn't give Arevalo special advantages, and impose restrictions on his opponent, in the name of "officer safety." If the bout went the distance, the police union wouldn't be able to influence the decision rendered by the judges.
Not surprisingly, Arevalo has made himself scarce.
“There are many reasons why I’m trying to organize this
event,” Sanson told Pro Libertate. “First of all, there’s a grieving wife who
has been left without income of any kind and who is literally wasting away.
Rhonda approves of the idea – in fact, she’d love to get in the ring with
Arevalo herself, even though she’s down to less than one hundred pounds.”
“Secondly, I think this would help promote awareness of the
desperate need for policy and personnel changes at the Metro Police
Department,” Sanson continues. “It would also help focus attention on the
problems suffered by many returning veterans, some of whom may appear physically
healthy but who have psychological problems and deserve much better treatment
than they’re getting. I also want to build public support for revamping the
current policies regarding officer-involved shootings. Las Vegas has seen far
too many shootings of this kind in recent years,
yet the
official inquiries always exonerate
the shooter, no matter how absurd his story or obvious it is that it was a
bad shoot.”
Until two years ago, officer-involved shootings were
investigated through a County Coroner Inquest, a non-adversarial
procedure described by former Nevada District Court Judge Don Chairez as “a
search for justification of an officer’s actions.” Attorney Adam Lagomarsino refers
to the County Coroner Inquest procedure as "a kangaroo court and a dog and
pony show."
Lagomarsino filed a lawsuit against the Las Vegas Metro
Police on behalf of the family of Lavon Cole – an unarmed man who was
gunned down in his bathroom by a uniformed serial killer named Detective Bryan
Yant. Cole, who had been targeted for a narcotics sting by the Metro Police,
was trying to dispose of roughly an ounce of marijuana – a quantity
insufficient to sustain a misdemeanor possession charge in Nevada.
The raid on Cole’s home was staged for a film crew employed
by Langley Productions – the loathsome outfit responsible for the police-porn
series “COPS.” Playing to the camera, Yant had brought along his AR-15 rifle,
which was unnecessary for an operation targeting a mild-mannered non-violent
offender. After bursting into the bathroom, Yant shot Cole in the back while
his pregnant girlfriend was pinned to the floor in the next room with a gun to
her head.
In addition to a previous shooting under very similar
circumstances, Yant had
compiled a record of corruption, dishonesty, and criminal misconduct. His
version of the Cole shooting -- in which the victim supposedly made a “furtive”
movement that left the heroic detective in “fear for my life” – was impossible
to reconcile with the forensic evidence. Naturally, he was exonerated by the
Coroner’s Inquest.
The inquest procedure was introduced in 1969. Between 1976 and 2010, more than two hundred lethal force incidents
were examined by a seven-member jury. Only one of them was ruled
"negligent" -- and that decision was overturned on appeal.
This isn't a surprising result, given that the inquest procedure was a collegial exercise:
The D.A.'s office literally choreographed the questioning with the police
department prior to the hearing.
Attorney Lagomarsino points out that
no cross-examination of police officers was permitted during the inquest.
"We were allowed to submit written questions, one at a time, to the
prosecutor, but we couldn't cross-examine Yant" or even ask follow-up
questions, he told Pro Libertate
in
an August 2010 interview. The prosecutors didn’t even bother
to present a summation for the jury. At the conclusion of the inquest into the Trevon Cole shooting,
notes former District Judge Chairez, it appeared that the judge "was almost asking for a
directed verdict."
Five days before Stanley Gibson was murdered, the Clark
County Commission passed an ordinance to reform the Coroner’s Inquest process
by including a representative of the victim’s family and making key evidence
available to the public. This prompted a protest by the city’s largest criminal
lobby – the Las Vegas Police Protective Association, which instructed its
members to stop cooperating with the inquests altogether. On June 21, the
police union filed a petition for a writ of prohibition against the revised
inquest – the most recent of several legal challenges it has filed to
prevent the system from being implemented.
“This process is no longer fair to our officers,” sniveled union
spokesperson Chris Collins, whining that the revamped
arrangement wasn’t a “fair and level playing field.” Bear in mind that police officers were still immune to cross-examination, and the inquest jury was still prohibited from handing down an indictment.
The DA’s Office remains
disinclined to pursue grand jury investigations of police homicides. Accordingly,
the only “accountability” for Metro officers who kill while on the clock is
that provided by the
department’s “Force Investigation Team.”
Sannon (r.) with Sheriff Gillespie. |
Although he is on congenial terms with Sheriff Gillespie and
other key officials, Steve Sannon isn’t willing to countenance their
self-serving corruption – and he says that he knows more than a few police
officers who share his opinions.
“There are law enforcement officers who have expressed
concerns to me about bad leadership at Metro,” Sannon told Pro Libertate. “I’ve
even had a few of them call me and tell me they’d love to see me in the ring
with Arevalo, who’s considered a cocky jerk.”
Sannon says that sponsors are lining up to promote the
event. There is no institutional or legal impediment to the proposed fight. In
fact, an active-duty police officer participated in the June
11 Rogue Warrior Cage Fighting Championships at the Cannery Casino, which
raised money for the Stars and Stripes Foundation.
“There’s no reason why Arevalo, who was a fighter before
becoming a cop, couldn’t take part in this event,” Sannon observes. That is to
say, there’s no reason apart from cowardice and (what’s much the same thing) a
bad conscience. In any case, Sannon isn’t going to relent in his efforts to impose
hands-on accountability for the murder of Stanley Gibson by calling out a police officer who is protected by a system permitting
him to kill without consequences.
Dum spiro, pugno!
6 comments:
To question police authority in any situation is
a mortal risk of life and limb.
If you resist that authority in any way, you invite
immediate escalation to deadly force; no quarter.
God help you if you are confused, scared or just
indignant.
The irony may be that some of the very men who
cornered Gibson (and scared him out of his wits)
were also veterans well skilled in the art of
diplomacy "by other means."
Just following the link to the so-called "discussion" in Las Vegas leaves me with the opinion that there is a sizable contingent of goose-stepping fascists who wholeheartedly agree with killing anyone who doesn't "comply". And if you happen to get killed by your saviors then that's just tough for you. Honestly, Will, death and destruction couldn't happen fast enough to such mindless disconnected robots.
There is no such thing as "qualified immunity" in the Octagon; Arevalo wouldn’t be able to call for backup, nor would he be able to press charges for "obstruction," "disorderly conduct," or "resisting arrest." The referee wouldn't give Arevalo special advantages, and impose restrictions on his opponent, in the name of "officer safety." If the bout went the distance, the police union wouldn't be able to influence the decision rendered by the judges.
I bet, though, if Arevalo somehow got an advantage over his opponent and was at least temporarily able to land a number of blows in succession, he would reflexively yell, "STOP RESISTING! STOP RESISTING!"
Habits are hard to break.
Dear Mr. Grigg,
Yours is an n immensely valuable blog. You are doing good work.
Sadly such outrages will continue happening for the foreseeable future.
But until they can be halted altogether, they must be exposed for what they are. They must not go unnoticed. The victims must not die in vain.
Sometimes Karma takes decades. Yes, the cops were murderers, pure and simple.
So was Mr. Gibson during the "war" - aiding and abetting the insane carnage.
May he and all victims find peace.
I would have felt sorry for him if he didnt take money to slaughter Iraqi Mothers and children for the USA Corporations. But he took money to slaughter people and now he died by the same monsters as him self. He can rot in hell
Post a Comment