Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 23:45:43
-0600
Dear
Mickey,
We
continue to try to obtain funding to get on with finishing the last
year of Engineering Development for the MEG. And we are still hopeful
that we will eventually succeed. We have been very, very close on two
occasions, only to watch things fall apart at the last minute. We are
in other promising negotiations right now.
Inventors such as the five of us who invented the MEG did not make the
system that inventors and researchers have to work under. The only
thing of value that an inventor has is his intellectual property
rights, under our system. So we obtained the
Unless
the inventor is a fool or backed by a large company, he cannot deal
with most of the conventional funding channels for research. Look at
it this way. In the
One or
more of our major prestigious Department of Defense research groups
actually has an infamous habit of affixing a clause in one’s contract,
stating that the “government retains its march-in rights”. That silly
phrase means that a single bureaucrat can one day just write one
letter or directive, declaring that you are not “getting the device to
development and marketing quickly enough to meet the government’s
needs”, and so the government “exercises its march-in rights”. This
means it simply seizes the patent and rights, assigns them to one of
its “big favored contractors” to do it around you, and the nonplussed
inventor watches his invention get rapidly developed and marketed
right around him. Supposedly one can get some kind of “compensation”
for such, but usually that really means nothing at all unless you are
a big company and hire your lawyers by the year.
Several
other inventors also have legitimate COP>1.0 energy-from-the-vacuum
systems. But all of them have the same problem: Lack of the
substantial funds required to finish a laboratory demonstration
process and take it into a developed technology for mass production
and sales. And just about total exclusion from the normal research
funding channels, unless one is just anxious to give away all his hard
years of work, etc.
The
legitimate venture capital comes in mixed types. About half of the
venture capitalists are just looking to make a killing, and the wish
to just displace you and your development team, and just take over
your invention totally. In this case that is foredoomed to failure,
because they will assign it to electrical engineers, and not use the
necessary sophisticated team of Aharonov-Bohm specialists (both theory
and measurement), nonlinear oscillation control expert (Russian
system, not the U.S. system, is required), a modeling expert skilled
in modeling in a higher group symmetry electrodynamics -- such are
very rare, a theoretician skilled in higher group theory
electrodynamics, etc.
Most
venture capitalists just wish to find and acquire control of a system
already developed and ready for full production and quick marketing.
Even
the foundations who specialize in seeking out innovations, are also
insistent that the system must already be in full completed prototype
for formal production.
In
short, nobody wishes to fund the necessary final phase of Engineering
Development, but only the production engineering and production phase.
And if
the development is placed under electrical engineers, it is lost
anyway, because electrical engineering specifically prohibits such
COP>1.0 electrical power systems taking their excess energy from the
vacuum. The EE models excludes any active vacuum – and thus any energy
from the vacuum – from the getgo. So electrical engineers will likely
build a good COP<1.0 transformer, fully complying with ordinary
electrical engineering theory and modeling. They will not build a MEG,
which violates both electromagnetic theory and conventional EM
modeling.
There
is also a formidable array of powerful cartels which do not wish such
systems to be produced, and some of these cartels have been
suppressing such systems since Nikola Tesla (actually since
Stubblefield, even before Tesla). Some of these cartels are in
industry (particularly in the big nuclear reactor power plant
business), some in Science (some very powerful ones, as in the hot
fusion and big accelerators community), some in the financial
community, etc. At about the third level down from the top in such
powerful organizations, that is the level at which the actions for the
organization are actually implemented. Call that “actual
implementation” level the “entourage level”. By the bell-shaped curve,
some 11 % or so of the entourage level leaders have no morals at all,
are totally greedy and grasping and self-serving, and would kill their
own grandmother to “get ahead” or gain personal control, influence,
and money. That 11% is playing the “big monkey game” (primate
dominance) with a vengeance. This faction of the entourage establishes
lateral relations with all sorts of other groups and outside groups,
even with mafias, etc. Murder and assassination thus become a tool
sometimes used, as are all sorts of character assassinations, “gamings”,
etc. You really have not lived until you experience what comes down on
you from these entourages that are “sour” and evil. It isn’t like it’s
advertised in the newspaper. All large and powerful organizations have
their entourages, and they also develop that 11% evil faction. And
that is where all the games and gaming occurs. It’s a total way of
life, involved and hidden in all large organizations of government,
religion, industry, science, and any large element of society.
Machiavelli is not dead, but very much alive and well, and functioning
on a massive scale, though quite well hidden.
Further, our scientific leadership – and here we directly refer to the
National Academy of Sciences, the National Science Foundation, etc. –
is also adamantly opposed to the very notion of COP>1.0 electrical
power systems, taking their excess energy from the vacuum. If our
scientific community really was devoted to science, and could rid
itself of that bad 11% of its entourages, all one would have to do is
point out the terrible flaws being propagated (now for more than a
century) in electrical engineering and classical Maxwell-Heaviside
electrodynamics, and there would be an immediate scientific move to
correct such terrible errors. There isn’t, and there won’t be. The
scientific entourages in cushy relations with “outside money”,
prestige, and influence and control from upholding the status quo,
will see that it doesn’t happen.
There
is also a professional “skeptical” scientific community, vicious but
extraordinarily naďve. The skeptical community is still not even aware
that the standard CEM/EE model assumes that every EM field, potential,
and joule of EM energy in the universe is and has been freely created
from nothing at all, by their associated source charges, in total
violation of the conservation of energy law. The real mission of the
entourages in the skeptical community is to serve the bad entourages
in the scientific community, by being attack dogs and attacking like a
pack of converted dogs gone wild. It is not about science at all, but
about the big monkey game. That is why for a hundred years they have
spouted the falsity that perpetual motion (
We
bring that up because one of the major mechanisms used to suppress the
overunity EFTV system research effort is to vehemently proclaim that a
COP>1.0 EFTV electrical power system is a dirty old perpetual motion
machine, and that this means it would be a system violating the first
law of thermodynamics (conservation of energy) because it would
require a system doing continuous work without any energy input. It’s
a cosmic joke! Every charge in the universe already physically
demonstrates COP = infinity, and it continuously produces negative
entropy, totally falsifying the present emasculated
second half- law of
thermodynamics and requiring its revision. Yet it continuously obeys
the conservation of energy law, since it receives all that energy it
then outputs, but just receives it in virtual state form and converts
it. It actually is a steady state nonequilibrium system continuously
receiving energy and continuously doing “work” (changing the form of
its received energy, from the virtual state to the observable state).
E.g.,
start with an electrical power system in equilibrium – the state of
maximum entropy. To get it to do anything, it must be moved away
from equilibrium into a state of nonequilibrium (an “excited” state or
“potentialized” state, with additional potential energy), and that
movement represents a negative
entropy operation. If you put the extra energy in, in a
different form, it has to be converted to potentialize the system, and
so that will cost you some work for that conversion. But if the energy
is input from a free flow and in the same form, it will not cost you
any work at all for that excess energy that the system takes on. Mere
transfer of energy in the same form is not work; work is rigorously
the change of form of energy. So the present second law assumes that a
previous negative entropy operation has already occurred, to excite
the system and move it out of equilibrium, but it does not account for
it. Instead, it accounts for the
subsequent entropic decay
of that nonequilibrium system back to the equilibrium state,
increasing its entropy as it does so. Simply put, it only applies to
the “decay” of excited systems, never to their excitation process. And
even then, it only applies where no additional negative entropy
operation occurs to void or reverse the entropic decay. Hence it is
only a “half-law” at best. It was never a full law of nature.
The
question then is, can a system be freely “excited”, or must one “pay
for the excitation”? The resounding answer is that it can freely be
excited – the potential energy of any EM system can be freely changed
at will, and that is covered by the gauge freedom axiom of gauge field
theory. As a physical example, freeze the charges q in a system so
that dq/dt = 0. And then change the voltage, say by a hundredfold.
Voltage amplification alone is not work or power. And so by merely
increasing the voltage while suppressing the current, one has just
increased the potential energy collected in that system (on its pinned
charges q) by a factor of 100, without doing any work at all. That is
simple “asymmetrical regauging” – increasing a single potential of the
system so that its collected potential energy is freely increased at
no cost to the operator. (In the real world, you will have to pay for
a little judicious switching energy, but nothing like the excess free
potential energy collected in that system). When the charges q are
then subsequently released in the now-potentialized system, that
system will discharge its excess potential energy under the present
second half-law, which covers just such decay situations only. So that
system will permissibly do free work for you, powering real loads.
Instead of that simple thing, we are all taught that
two potentials – both
A and phi – should be changed, and they should be changed just so that
the two new force fields that also freely occur are equal and
opposite. In short, we are taught to
arbitrarily uphold
Lorentz invariance of the descriptive equations and Lorentz symmetry
of the circuit, as if such were absolutely required by nature.
It
isn’t.
It’s
required by dogma and arbitrary custom, and by rigorous suppression of
any deviation from the “party line”.
There
is even a part of the environmental community which, under the
commendable purpose of sustainability, nevertheless actually wishes to
eliminate about
three-quarters of the living people on the planet. This is a very
powerful faction of the community, confusing what should be a good
purpose with a very detrimental implementation. It’s rather like the
solution Hitler advanced for solving the “Jewish Problem”. The
entourages of that part of the community are going to see that this
intention is maintained. And the last thing those entourages wish to
see, is the advent of self-powering fuel-free EFTV electrical power
systems.
Those
cartels that also reap vast sums of money from the present highly
centralized electrical power system’s way of doing business, and from
all the oil sales and pipelines and distribution lines and the big
power plants etc., possess long-standing entourages that are also
absolutely determined not to change, but to give you “more of the
same”. The last thing these entourages wish is the development of
decentralized electrical power systems that are fuel-free,
self-powering, taking their input energy directly from the local
vacuum.
Meanwhile, in the asymmetric terrorist war on the
EM energy from the vacuum universally occurs and flows and is actually
absolutely free
. Every EM field and potential is already a set of such steady and
ongoing real EM energy flows, as shown by E.T. Whittaker in 1903 and
1904. Every EM circuit and system is already filled with gobs of
charges q, all pouring out real usable EM energy that the charges
directly extract from the local vacuum. The energy in every EM field
or potential is already a set of such Whittaker EM energy flows
extracted directly from the seething vacuum by their associated source
charges. Real EM energy in nature occurs in steady energy flows, not
in so many chunks like ears of corn piled in a corn crib. Collection
of the flowing energy on charges q, by the interaction of the ongoing
free energy flows (the fields and potentials) does produce “steady
states” of deviation in the flows. Those are called “energy
collection”.
You
see, we do not have to discover
how to extract the useful EM energy from the seething disordered
vacuum! We only
have to recognize and teach that it is already ubiquitously done by
every charge! And
then we must search out and change what we are doing wrong in our
circuits so that they cannot use some of the free energy to give us
some free work. The reason our scientists have never
discovered how the energy was being extracted from the vacuum by the
source charges, until we solved it circa 1999 and published it in
2000, was that this long-vexing “source charge problem”, wasn’t
solvable by the old fellows, so they just scrubbed it out of all the
textbooks and ignored it. Even today, most electrical power
engineering students (and even many of the professors) have never even
heard of the source charge problem.
We do
not have to discover how to absorb the totally disordered virtual
(subquantal) fluctuation energy from the vacuum, then how to reorder
it (still virtual but ordered), how to then coherently integrate it to
quantum (observable) level, and then how to re-emit it as ordered real
EM energy (real photons), spreading at light speed in all directions.
Every charge in the universe
already freely does that for us. We just have to
understand that they do it, and then we have to work out how to
properly “catch” and use energy from those free energy flows from
every source charge. Presently we have been taught to do it wrong.
The sad
part is that here we are, despoiling the planet and the biosphere,
worrying about providing energy by beating nature massively and in a
brute force manner, when nature has always provided us with such an
incredible amount of ongoing free EM energy flow that it boggles the
human mind. But the problem is that, long before scientists even knew
there was an active vacuum, or an electron, or a nucleus of an atom,
they produced and “froze” electrical power engineering theory. And
they did it in such a way as to produce only Lorentz-symmetrical
systems described by Lorentz-invariant mathematics. After awhile,
they then simply proclaimed that mess as based on “irreducible laws of
nature”. At that point, it became dogma rather than science.
The
adherence to Lorentz symmetry and to Lorentz invariant equations makes
the mathematics and the systems simpler, and therefore much easier to
solve, but it also produces and describes only COP< 1.0 electrical
power systems taking their energy from the vacuum. And even then it
totally conceals and assumes away (1) the active vacuum, and (2) the
production of all that observable EM energy from virtual (subquantal)
energy. So it means that our electrical power engineers have been
taught a highly restrained electrodynamics, riddled with errors and
omissions, that guarantee the present horrendous mess, the terrible
destruction of the biosphere, etc. Ironically, the very first thing
one must do, to develop and work in and with legitimate COP>1.0 EFTV
systems, is to learn how to build EM systems that deliberately violate
Lorentz symmetry and whose descriptive equations therefore violate
Lorentz invariance. But to even mention such is almost to evoke a
tirade of scientific dogma and vehemence reminiscent of the dark ages.
Most mathematicians have so long worshiped symmetry as “beauty” that
such a suggestion is considered to be ugly and nightmarish beyond
human description. Yes, a small and determined group of physicists are
pushing to try to break through the “Lorentz invariance barrier”, but
they have a very hard row to hoe and they also take a real
professional beating (or undergo a lack of advancement, etc.). But
they are trying.
So the
experiences one encounters in trying to get legitimate funding for an
overunity EM power system development are very “interesting”, if one
uses the Chinese
definition of “interesting”. One day perhaps one should write a book
on the experiences one actually meets and the things that actually
happen. The problem is, no one would believe such a book if it were
written!
The
only way one can proceed in such an environment is to try to continue
within the prescribed intellectual property system, not promoting
stock sales etc., until finally such a proper financial arrangement
can be consummated.
So that
is what we are continuing to do. The five of us have invested a
substantial portion of our lives, and a great deal of our own personal
money, in just getting this far. This effort is the estate I do not
have. It’s the house that has not been paid for. It’s driving a 1990
automobile rather than a shiny new one (hey, I like my old 1990 Sedan
de Ville, bought it second hand, and wouldn’t trade it for a new car
anyway). It’s continuing after a heart attack and hypoxia, and the
deterioration of one’s aerobic system by the BW-modified mycoplasma
caught while stationed in
Anyway,
that’s about all I can tell you.
We will continue. We
do not “hustle stock” onto a gullible public to cut into the savings
of hard working folks on what is still a risk venture. We have not
taken and will not knowingly take “laundered” money from nefarious
enterprises. Etc. We are trying to do it right up the middle. We’ve
freely explained – on the net, in books, in papers, etc. – exactly
how the MEG gets its extra energy from the altered local
spacetime/vacuum. And how many other legitimate overunity EFTV systems
do it. We’ve cited the hard physics references that prove the
Aharonov-Bohm effect, and thus prove that such can indeed be done and
that such has been experimentally demonstrated innumerable times (some
20,000 papers in the hard physics literature, even though the AB
effect is not in electrical power engineering).
We
continue to point out that the COP> 1.0 Takahashi Magnetic Wankel
engine can be successfully replicated by any technical university’s
electrical engineering department. So far, not a single one has been
built, to our knowledge. We point out that the “negative resonance
absorption” from the medium, known and experimentally verified in
physics since 1967, has a thermodynamic COP = 18 in the IR and in the
UV, for optimized experiments.
We
point out that electrical engineers do not at all calculate the
force-free EM field as it occurs in space, but only the point
intensity of the interaction of that “actual EM field in space” with
static charged matter. In short, they only calculate the
point intensity of
the effect
in charged static matter of the ongoing interaction of the real
force-free field in space with that matter.
We
point out that the present flawed form of the Second Law of
thermodynamics is an oxymoron implicitly assuming its own
contradiction first has occurred, but has not been and is not
accounted. Along with many others, we have pointed out that the Second
Law already has quite a few known and accepted violations. Any
equilibrium system merely moving out of equilibrium lowers its
entropy, in violation of the second law. And every statistical
fluctuation in a many-particle system violates the second law while
the excursion is occurring. As do sharp gradients, memory of
materials, etc. Those are all
known and recognized violations, accepted by the leading
thermodynamicists themselves. The new Second Law we
advanced gathers all of those in, and now includes all those areas in
its prescription. It includes systems that generate continuous
negative entropy (every charge in the universe does it), which thus
totally falsify the present hoary old form of the second “half-law”.
The new second law includes such continuous negative entropy systems.
Evans and Rondoni theoretically demonstrated that such systems are
indeed permitted by thermodynamics, but despaired of any real system
doing so. To the contrary, we proposed the first physical system that
does it and that can easily be experimentally shown to do it: the
common charged particle. But to see that, one had to first solve the
long-vexing source charge problem itself. And one had to thus extend
the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) to include
conservation between virtual state and observable state.
So we
will continue. In the world climate and the events now rushing toward
us, there is shortly going to arrive a time when the economy is
collapsing around us and all the legitimate free energy inventors will
be avidly sought, in a desperate attempt to develop EFTV overunity
electrical power systems and prevent or soften the total economic
collapse of the Western world. It would be far better if that effort
were started right now, with all possible speed – but meanwhile one
does what one can.
Let us
hope that the scientific positions and the cartels “soften” very soon.
And we are not just speaking of the MEG and this group of five
inventors, but of all the other overunity inventors struggling with
their systems, within the same hostile environment, with a lack of
legitimate funding and usually the lack of the sophisticated
scientific team that should be working the problem.
For
comic relief, one realizes that the Creator must have a great sense of
humor, for the job definitely requires it. Here the creation has
provided us with available, free, unlimited electrical energy flowing
freely from every charge in the universe. Everywhere. In every EM
system ever built or that ever will be built. And in the midst of such
incredible riches of available energy for the taking, our scientists
have botched it for more than a century, despoiling the planet and
savagely fighting and tearing nature itself, ripping out and consuming
vast quantities of hydrocarbons, nuclear fuel rods, etc., killing of
species and poisoning the biosphere, and all the while proclaiming how
advanced our science is and that we can do no better in our efforts to
keep up with the rapidly escalating demands for energy and
transportation.
Best wishes,
Tom
Bearden
|