Subject: RE: Dr. Tom, motional
electric field ?
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 11:13:54 -0600
Dear David,
Thanks for the
comments. No, the motional electromagnetic field seems to be different
from the normal magnetic field, and would seem to be either the B(3)
(longitudinal) magnetic field that Evans details and shows, or something
akin to it. The AB effect yields a strange beast: the field-free
magnetic vector potential A. An interesting phenomenon occurs with that
effect. Consider the permanent magnet inside the special core
material. If it were "free", then around it in space there would be a
normal magnetic field. However, that field has been withdrawn from
outside space and localized within the special core itself. So you
still have all the B-field energy, but it is highly localized, not
spread out in space.
But when that field is
NOT localized, it reduces in intensity with the inverse square of the
distance.
When the B-field is
localized in the core, the outside spacetime is still curved due to the
magnet! So a curvature of spacetime represents an increase in energy
density in that space. In short, that curvature of spacetime now is
devoid of the previous "swirl" of the B-field, which has been
withdrawn. So it is filled with a "non-swirling" magnetic vector
potential.
That's interesting,
because the A-potential falls of only inversely as the square of the
distance! So we really have greater usable energy density in that
outside space now, than we had when the B-field occupied it and fell off
much more rapidly in magnitude.
The result is that the
usable energy in the actual external space has itself been automatically
increased by nature.
To put it simply:
Nature loved you getting rid of all that painful "swirling" of the
energy that is represented by the vector B. By allowing her to just
"flow the energy straight away", she was able to put a lot more in that
space.
In short, this is a
direct energy amplification process. The difference between what we do
in the MEG and what a good toroid does, is that we do not have to "pay"
any energy to do it. In a toroid, you have to furnish power and push
those electrons through that reluctance. We get the same effect without
inputting an "payment" energy at all, once the beast is assembled.
In a sense, we are
getting nature to give us more EM energy from that permanent magnet that
she did before. Before, she only give us the swirling energy, whether
A-potential or B-field. Now she gives us all the same B-field energy,
just confined to the core, while also giving us even more A-potential
energy outside that localization.
Any way you cut it, we
have more energy -- and freely -- to work with than one does from a
normal permanent magnet with its field nonlocalized.
Best wishes,
Tom Bearden
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 08:16:17 -0800
From: David
Subject: Dr. Tom, motional electric field ?
Dear Dr. Bearden,
In his U.S. patent, 3,610,971, Hooper discusses what he calls
the "motional electric field", he attributes solely to the
motion of charge. Isn't this exactly the A-B electro-static
effect ?
Some quick shirt-sleeve equations seem to indicate this
could increase the MEG output appreciably. If so, winding
sense, core-flux polarity, turns-per-layer, and volume of
output coil (collector) would be some of the important
parameters.
Your MEG write-up doesn't mention the electrostatic effect,
but based on Hooper's discussion it would be significant.
I hope you are much improved, keep breathing !!
Sincerely,
David
|