| Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 21:56:29
-0500
Dear Esteve,
Your very
nice letter is appreciated.
The rights
to the motionless electromagnetic generator are assigned to Magnetic
Energy Limited, whose CEO is Dr. Lee Kenny. Dr. Kenny handles all
matters concerning the MEG. His E-mail address is
jlkenny1@comcast.net.
I'm
forwarding this E-mail with yours attached, to Dr. Kenny. I suspect he
will contact you further, and perhaps send you a small brochure to let
you know how we are trying to proceed for obtaining research funding.
For a
little technical insight:
If you have
not done so please be sure to check my website for the paper on
curtailing the second law of thermodynamics. As far as electrodynamics
is concerned, the second law can be and is violated to any macroscopic
scale -- even across the entire universe -- that one desires. Indeed,
every bit of electrodynamics, including every source charge, field,
potential, and every joule of EM energy in space or in matter, exists in
total violation of the second law.
Eerily, the
very notion of the second law -- continuously increasing disorder ---
presupposes that negentropy (increase of ordering) in at least the same
amount as the disordering must first have occurred a priori. Else there
could not exist the original ordering in the first place, to be
subsequently disordered increasingly as time passes. And the expanding
universe could not be accelerating in its expansion, which now it is
known is an observed fact.
Further,
every charge in the universe already exhibits COP = infinity. Any
observable charge continuously pours out EM energy (observable photons)
in all directions at the speed of light, as is easily shown
experimentally. Yet it is also well-known that there is no OBSERVABLE
electromagnetic energy input to the source charge.
So the
charge presents us with a real quandary. Present classical
electrodynamics and electrical engineering models assume that the charge
freely and continuously creates all that energy from nothing. So either
we must totally surrender the conservation law itself, or else we must
find what the input to the source charge is.
Actually,
the basis for the solution has been in particle physics for 45 years,
since the award of the Nobel Prize to Lee and Yang in 1957 for their
prediction of broken symmetry, which was experimentally proven by Wu and
her colleagues in early 1957. So profound a change to physics was this,
that the Nobel Prize was awarded to Lee and Yang the very same year ---
in December 1957. One of the proven broken symmetries is that of
opposite charges. Back to that in a moment.
The modern
physics view of the "isolated observable charge" is that it consists of
a bare charge (infinite) surrounded by clustering virtual charges of
opposite sign (also infinite). The difference between these two
infinite charges, however, is finite. It is the standard magnitude of
charge that the external observer will detect of the bare charge,
through the screening virtual charges of opposite sign. Anyway, the
modern view of the observable charge is (1) it is that dipolarity, and
(2) it involves two parts, each having infinite energy. (Simply read a
very clear explanation of all that in Nobelist Stephen Weinberg's
"Dreams of a Final Theory".)
But in the
modern view, the dipolarity (opposite charges) of the "isolated charge"
is a proven broken symmetry. That means rigorously that every charge in
the universe continuously and freely absorbs virtual photon energy from
the seething vacuum, transduces it into real observable photon energy,
and continuously emits that observable energy in all directions, freely.
All EM
fields, potentials, and their energy are established by that outpouring
of EM energy from the source charge, at the speed of light. This is
rigorous physics, and it has been rigorous physics for 45 years. It has
not made it into CEM and EE yet, because those 137 year old models do
not even include the active vacuum exchange, much less a broken symmetry
in it.
Every joule
of EM energy -- field or potential --- in matter and in empty space, was
extracted directly from the vacuum by the source charge's asymmetry in
its violent exchange with the vacuum.
There is
absolutely no problem in extracting all the EM energy one wishes, from
the vacuum, anywhere in the universe. The only problem is how to
intercept and "catch" and collect some of that continuous free flow of
energy in a circuit, direct it to the load and dissipate it in the load,
without using half the collected energy to destroy the source dipolarity
extracting and furnishing the energy from the vacuum.
The
ubiquitous closed current loop circuit self-enforces use of half the
collected energy to destroy the source dipole and shut off the free EM
energy flow from the vacuum. There is no law of nature requiring that
we have to use such a closed current loop circuit. We don't.
Anyway,
collection and usage without destroying the source dipole is the only
electrical power problem there has ever been, or still is. So obviously
no one is allowed to work on it -- the Department of Energy, the Academy
of Sciences, the National Science Foundation, the great universities,
etc.
One must
have a sense of humor. There is not now and there never has been, a
single electrical engineering department EE professor, or EE textbook
that even knows and teaches what powers an electrical circuit. Neither
do any of the huge power companies. And sadly, neither does the
environmental community.
Dr. Kenny
will respond in a more appropriate fashion with respect to the business
and planning aspects.
Best
wishes,
Tom
Bearden, Ph.D.
Magnetic
Energy Ltd.
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 14:26:56 +0200 |