"Energy from the Vacuum - Concepts & Principles"
Order Now!

Help support the research









 

Prof. X:

As you know, several nations of the world have developed quantum potential weapons and devices, from David Bohm’s hidden variable interpretation of quantum mechanics. Further, the largest and most powerful cartels (which Churchill just generically called the “High Cabal”) also have the use of such devices, since the cartels penetrate the governments and get access to anything of use to them, whether classified or not. It appears that the use of quantum potential effects is going to be used to directly “stop” legitimate overunity researchers who have systems approaching being ready for production and marketing with little additional difficulty.

In short, the High Cabal is going to dramatically increase that “little additional difficulty”, to make it just about impossible.

So here’s a bit of insight into the quantum potential, its ability against such specific “small effect” local and specific targets, and how it will be used to stop the leading overunity energy systems of the leading inventors and researchers. The end purpose, of course, is so we do not quickly get “energy from the vacuum” electrical power systems, and thus avoid the coming engineered economic collapse as a result of the dramatically increasing “energy from fuel” crisis.

Quoting David Bohm:

"We have instead to start from nonlocality (action at a distance) as the basic concept, and obtain locality (field contact action) as a special limiting case." [D. J. Bohm and B. J. Hiley, "On the intuitive understanding of nonlocality as implied by quantum theory," Foundations of Physics, 5(1), Mar. 1975, p. 93].

“We have in this way introduced a concept that is new in the context of physics – a concept that we shall call ‘active information’... The basic idea of active information is that a form having very little energy enters into and directs a much greater energy. The activity of the latter is in this way given a form similar to that of the smaller energy.”

Note that “energy amplification” – for free – is a basic included idea in Bohm’s hidden variable theory, and in the use of the quantum potential itself.

To connect things back toward a corrected CEM/EE model of electrodynamics, one can interpret Bohm’s statement as a statement of what I’ve been referring to as “precursor engineering”. Specifically, it incorporates the little-appreciated thermodynamic fact that work is only the change of form of energy, and that change of magnitude of energy without changing its form involves no work at all. The proof, e.g., occurs unnoticed in CEM/EE, when one merely amplifies the voltage while holding the current to zero. Let’s look at that for a moment. That, incidentally, is a permissible negative entropy operation, legitimately violating the hoary old second “half-law” of equilibrium thermodynamics. Such violation is readily permitted in far-from-equilibrium thermodynamics; e.g., for a listing of several areas known and recognized to permit the violation of the old second law, see Dilip Kondepudi and Ilya Prigogine, Modern Thermodynamics: From Heat Engines to Dissipative Structures, Wiley, New York, 1998, reprinted with corrections 1999, p. 359.

Electrostatic scalar potential (i.e., common voltage) represents a change in the potential electrical energy density of spacetime.  Voltage (electrical energy density of spacetime) amplification alone (e.g., with current frozen by momentarily pinning the charges) is work-free. So merely “potentializing some pinned charges” gives the free “collection of excess potential energy” by those pinned charges. (Actually one has changed the local energy density of the local spacetime in which the circuit’s charges q are embedded, and so one has freely changed the intensity of the ongoing interaction between the circuit’s charges q and their local spacetime/vacuum. In short, one has directly “excited the local vacuum and its interaction back upon the charges q.

When the charges in that “potentialized circuit” are again unpinned so that current can again flow, the increased voltage (electrical energy density of the local vacuum) now interacting with the charges q produces much more current and work in the circuit than the former unamplified voltage would have done. Let’s look a bit further at that, and also at violating the ubiquitous Lorentz symmetry usually applied.

E.g., in standard CEM/EE, the amount of potential energy W said to be “collected” by a set of charges q in a circuit, from potentializing voltage V,  is given by  W = Vq. If the charges q are pinned during potentialization and the current thus is zero (i.e., given dq/dt = 0), we will increase the energy “collection” of those charges q by a very large amount (delta W), completely work-free. This is a true energy amplification process, not only permitted but prescribed by thermodynamics. Note the important ingredient: the magnitude of the “collected energy” has been freely increased, but the form of the energy has remained the same and has not been changed.

E.g., if we multiply the applied voltage V by 100, with charges pinned, then the potential energy “collected” on those charges q is now Vq (new) = 100 x (Vq initial). All this without doing or requiring any work at all. And then by releasing the pinned charges so current can flow again, we can get much more work in the actual circuit load than would have been done by the original lesser potentialization. Work is the change of form of energy, not the change of magnitude of energy when it remains in the same form.

So one “free energy” method is the following: First, arrange a circuit so that one potentializes it in “static” (charges temporarily pinned) mode, drawing no current at all from the load and therefore doing no work – but nevertheless freely changing the magnitude of the collected potential energy in the circuit. Then with the charges still pinned, the primary source of potential is switched away, and that gap in the external circuit is re-completed (as, e.g., by adding a resistor and diode in series). This removes any possibility of the now-potentialized circuit being able to do work back inside the original source’s dipolarity, to destroy that primary source dipolarity.

But it leaves a now-separate external circuit that has been freely potentialized with real, usable excess EM energy. Then when the charges are unpinned in this external circuit, that circuit will dissipate its collected potential energy in normal fashion. It will thus deliver some free power in the load, while also destroying itself (its own dipolarity) because of this external circuit’s self-enforced Lorentz symmetry. But then the cycle can be iterated again and again, and the “source” is not being depleted, even though it is furnishing more and more energy to the external circuit once pinned and attached. All that the operator need furnish is (1) a pinning mechanism that lasts long enough for the potentializing and switching operations to be done, and (2) a built-in timing or mechanism that releases the pinning so that the separated but potentialized external circuit can dissipate its energy to give some powering of the load.

In short, potentialize the external circuit statically, separate the statically potentialized circuit from the original source, then dissipate the freely collected potential energy in the now-separated circuit.   This is one theoretical method of achieving an overunity COP Maxwellian electrical power system, while complying with conservation of energy, the laws of thermodynamics, and the laws of physics. Note, however, that we have employed an asymmetrical Maxwellian system. The standard electrical engineering model advances only symmetrical Maxwellian systems – since Lorentz arbitrarily discarded all the asymmetrical Maxwellian systems in 1892, and our universities still use that mutilated old model.

As Feynman points out in his 1964 three volumes of physics, there are no EM force fields in mass-free space. The CEM/EE model when put together in the 1880s and 1890s, assumed a thin material ether filling all space. Hence to the formative scientists back then, there was not a single point in the entire universe where mass was totally absent. Hence (to them) there were indeed “force fields in space”, i.e., in the “material ether”.

When the material ether concept was destroyed in the latter 1880s, not a single CEM/EE equation was ever changed to eliminate those erroneously assumed EM force fields in space. That glaring error – that EM force fields do exist in massless space – continues to be taught in every EE department, and by every EE textbook.

But the destruction of the material ether in the 1880s freed scientific thinking to reflect on the properties of “massless space” itself – and Einstein gave us special relativity and then general relativity. A curved spacetime, e.g., “has energy” but no force and no “work”. But when a curvature of spacetime interacts with matter (such as charged matter in electrodynamics), it produces real EM forces and real work in the material charged particle system.

Feynman also pointed out his frustration that "It is important to realize that in physics today, we have no knowledge of what energy is." [Richard P. Feynman, Robert B. Leighton, and Matthew Sands, The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, Vol. 1, 1964, p. 4-2].

But relativistically, we may define “energy” as any change in the condition of massless spacetime itself. In that case, the ongoing interaction of energy with mass is necessary in order to generate a force to be accomplished. Force exists only in and on matter being interacted by a change in spacetime curvature or twisting, never in empty space. This agrees with Feynman’s observations. Again quoting Feynman:

"…in dealing with force the tacit assumption is always made that the force is equal to zero unless some physical body is present… One of the most important characteristics of force is that it has a material origin…" [Richard P. Feynman, Robert B. Leighton, and Matthew Sands, The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, Vol. 1, 1964, p. 12-2].

"…the existence of the positive charge, in some sense, distorts, or creates a "condition" in space, so that when we put the negative charge in, it feels a force. This potentiality for producing a force is called an electric field." [Richard P. Feynman, Robert B. Leighton, and Matthew Sands, The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, Vol. 1, 1964, p. 2-4].

"We may think of E(x, y, z, t) and B(x, y, z, t) as giving the forces that would be experienced at the time t by a charge located at (x, y, z), with the condition that placing the charge there did not disturb the positions or motion of all the other charges responsible for the fields." [ibid, vol. II, p. 1-3.]

"One of the most important characteristics of force is that it has a material origin, and this is not just a definition. … If you insist upon a precise definition of force, you will never get it!" [ibid., Vol. 1, 1964, p. 12-2].  Here Feynman is pointing out that force is not a “separate thing”, but an ongoing dynamic function. He also despaired of any precise definition of force itself. And without a definition of energy, he is correct in that force cannot be defined.

Let us call “energy”, then, the curvature or twisting or change in spacetime, which also implies an appropriate simultaneous change in the virtual particle flux of vacuum. There is no force involved in this definition, since there is no mass involved in it.

Let us call this “massless and force-free energy” the precursor energy – i.e., the precursor energy (of space itself) for what has been called “kinetic energy” and “static energy” of an object (mass) or a material system. In short, the “collected energy of the mass or charge” is determined by its ongoing interaction with its precursor field – its ongoing interaction with curved or distorted spacetime, which is also its interaction with the altered virtual particle flux of the vacuum.

In this way, we can now precisely define force: Force is the effect upon a material system of the ongoing interaction between the precursor energy of the local altered spacetime and the matter of that material system. Electromagnetic force then becomes the effect upon a charged matter system of the ongoing interaction between the precursor energy (of massless spacetime) and the charged matter of that system.

So “precursor energy” is very like (and may be exactly) what “information” energy ultimately is in the Bohm hidden variable theory.  But it is directly connected to CEM/EE and real circuits and systems, by the ongoing interaction between precursor fields and the matter of that system.

Correcting the falsity of “force fields in space” in the CEM/EE model leads us directly into Bohm’s “information” approach and his hidden variable theory.

This happened in the “superweapons” developments of several nations (such as Russia, Brazil, Israel etc.) when scientists in these nations secretly corrected the sad old 1880s CEM/EE model, and the even-older mechanics theory, and progressed to a precursor fields model (in one form or another). In Russia this superweapons science and engineering (precursor engineering) area is called “energetics”, and its weaponization aspects are still highly classified. They are also tightly controlled by the KGB itself (including the superweapons themselves, which are not in the regular Russian armed forces, but are possessed and operated by special troops maintained and controlled by the KGB itself. In that fashion, the KGB retains its iron grip on, and control of, Russia itself).

As you can see, once one has progressed to “precursor” science (and to its engineering, then as the precursor technology is developed), one has already progressed into the very thing that Bohm’s hidden variable theory deals with. One has directly entered the practical science and engineering of Bohm’s hidden variable theory of quantum mechanics. And so one of the entities one meets in precursor science is Bohm’s quantum potential, the “separate nonlocalized precursor or information” effect shown in Bohm’s theory.

This should not be too surprising, after all. In classical electrodynamics, infinite speed of the scalar potential is already known under certain conditions. E.g., quoting Jackson:

"...[In the Coulomb gauge] the scalar potential 'propagates' instantly everywhere in space. The vector potential, on the other hand, satisfies the wave equation ... with its implied finite speed of propagation c. … "...the transverse current ... extends over all space, even if J is localized." [J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, second edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1975, p. 223].

Let us call a specific set of forces (and their dynamics) in matter -- which generate some specifically designed action or set of actions (effects) in that material system – an engine or a force engine. We are merely recognizing that a specific dynamics (effect) in a material system involves a specific force engine (direct cause). But now this force engine is further comprised of a precursor engine (energy engine or “information” engine) in ongoing interaction with the matter in that system.

So we can start with a tiny little force engine adjusted to give us the proper ongoing precursor engine we desire. Then we can directly amplify that precursor energy engine “for free” (i.e., work-free), so that a precursor engine of great magnitude is generated. Then that very large precursor engine, interacting with a distant mass system, will produce in that system the exact but giant force engine we originally started with as our “template”. In military terms, this is a “force amplifier” of great portent.

We can even “phase conjugate” that basic little precursor engine, and get a precursor engine for exactly the opposite effect in targeted matter (i.e., we can get a precise “precursor antiengine). This is very important in curing diseases. Given a sampling “precursor engine” for the physical disease engine, one can phase conjugate and amplify the basic “disease precursor engine” to generate a direct precursor antiengine to cure that specific disease or condition. Or, if one goes the other way and does not phase conjugate the disease engine, one can make a very powerful, amplified “precursor disease engine” and use it to generate specific diseases in targeted biological systems – such as in humans.

The decades-long microwave radiation of the U.S. Embassy in the Soviet Union was specifically a demonstration of that “disease induction” precursor engineering, to see if our Western scientists had any notion of what was happening. They didn’t, since standard electrical engineers from Johns Hopkins were sent in to “evaluate” the situation. And their very good “normal electrical engineering” examination of the “microwave radiation” showed an interesting thing: All the induced diseases and health changes occurred in force-field-free areas of the Embassy. That is, in those areas where the potentials were “steady” and had no dynamic changes. That is, in the precursor field regions of the Embassy!

In short, it demonstrated that the “static or steady potentials” had had induced in their internal Whittaker structuring the necessary “precursor engines” for the specific diseases and health changes induced in the charged matter of interacting bodies in those areas.

This was a deliberate intelligence probe, on a very high level target, to positively ascertain whether or not our own scientists understood precursor engineering. Our response actions then told the KGB with 100% certainty that we had no knowledge of such things.

The several nations who were into the superweapons development area early-on, and therefore passed beyond the old CEM/EE model and into the “precursor science and engineering” area, were naturally impelled into Bohm’s hidden variables theoretical approach. This meant that those nations developed quantum potential usage and weapons as a natural progression of the developing precursor engineering technology.

Now that nonlocal effects have been quite well-established in modern physics, we are indeed faced with the fact that precursor “information” is a universal connection capability, so that – to express it crudely – there is zero “signal distance travel time in space” between any two entities or points (or any number of widely separated entities or points) interconnected by a quantum potential. To the quantum potential weapon user, the distant stars are just as close as a millimeter from his laboratory QP weapon apparatus. Intervening mass (such as the ocean or the earth or sun) is no barrier, for the “information signal” does not “travel through” the intervening space.

Today, the QP weapons possessed by several nations are the most powerful weapons on earth. This is highly significant since, with precursor engineering and by a very small investment in switching and control, one can establish and control extraordinarily powerful and instantaneous distant effects. Hence if one works with the precursor energy, one can produce extraordinarily powerful effects, including at a distance, limited only by the state of development of the technology.

The major “tricks” in QP engineering development are to be able to establish a QP at will between two or more separated objects, or the entire class of a certain kind of objects, or to just one object, etc. Solutions to those areas are what determine the progress of QP weapons technology.

But the QP-Bohm technology can also be used to produce desired tiny effects at a distance. One does not always seek to sudden vaporize an entire city, but may wish to do a very simple and small – but strategically important – thing. Blocking the success of emerging overunity CEM/EE power systems is of just such strategic importance to those determined to evoke a catastrophic economic collapse of the United States (and Western Europe) due to the escalating energy-from-fuel crisis.

E.g., capture the precursor engine for the basic operational effect (the Aharonov-Bohm localization of the magnetic B-field in the core) of a MEG. Then, when the MEG group is to have a critical demonstration for potential financial backers, simply insert the phase conjugate of that AB precursor engine.  Remember, there is zero spatial and time distance between the inserting lab device and the distant MEG, since with the QP connection the two exist in a multiply-connected spacetime. This insertion of the AB precursor anti-engine directly negates the operating AB precursor engine in the MEG itself, causing the unit to lapse back into a normal transformer. And no electrical engineer will even begin to recognize what is actually wrong or what has happened. The unit just simply does not work to produce overunity in the demonstration. In short, just nullify its precursor engine, and it will fail to meet its overunity test. Yet later, once the offending “precursor antiengine” is removed, the same MEG unit will operate normally again, as if nothing had happened. And no amount of normal electrical testing and checking can come up with the “cause of the failure”.

This is the type of effect that is apparently being set up to use against leading overunity energy systems and inventors, to guarantee their failure during critical demonstrations, and thus to guarantee that they are not funded and their systems never get finished and never reach the market.

This, in turn, will result in us continuing under the onslaught of the ever-increasing energy-from-fuel crisis, caused by the escalating fuel crisis.  If this present MidEast war expands dramatically (and one suspects it will), then the oil supplies from most of the MidEast may well be substantially disrupted. And this at a time when we have difficulties elsewhere (Venezuela, some in Mexico, squeeze-down of the Iraqi oil, etc.) and a 400,000 barrel shortage caused by shutdown of the Prudhoe field in Alaska plus our own energy shortages remaining from Hurricane Katrina.

In short, the QP weapons will almost certainly be very gingerly used by the High Cabal to stop the leading U.S. and European overunity systems from being funded and developed in time to prevent economic collapse of the United States. With a major disruption of MidEast oil, etc., then the catastrophic economic collapse of the United States (and Western Europe) is assured. In the face of that giant chaos, our own strategic destruction is also assured.

There is always more than one way to fight a war, particularly an asymmetric war that already violates all the normal “rules”.

Hope this helps a bit.

Best wishes,

Tom