Subject:  Bizarre Contrail Formations over Victoria, Powell  River/Sunshine Coast, B.C., Canada

Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 08:20:48 -0500

Dear Suzanne,    

  Let me congratulate you on your remarkable job of personal research.  I've been as concerned as everyone else on the contrails, which definitely are occurring over the U.S. as well as Canada.    

  I've not checked deeply into it due to press of affairs on other matters.  However, I can add a couple of details that might be helpful.    

  On one occasion (I did not record it, etc., but just observed), I also noticed dark aircraft, silent, laying down patterned contrail or spray over Huntsville, Alabama shortly, about 1:30 in the afternoon.  They were deliberately laying "crossed patterns" as if on a square grid and drawing vertical and horizontal lines.    

  My friend and close colleague, John Bedini, reports many such incidents continuing over Coeur D'Alene Idaho.  Here he picked up samples of the dust that fell to earth from the "atmospheric seeding", and had it assayed.  He found barium oxide powder in it, as well as aluminum and a couple other things.  Definitely meets the insane requirements of stratospheric Welsbach seeding to combat global warming, as Professor Robock anguished about.  Also, both barium and aluminum dust are harmful to humans and other life.  In the areas where the spraying is going on, a number of people are affected.

  Also, apparently not classified but being kept very hush-hush, there are additional quiet preparations for a desperate answer to the threat of biological attack on our cities.  The terrorist teams from several nations and several groups, with necessary agents such as anthrax, are already infiltrated into the U.S. (and Canada too), waiting for the command to go from their foreign controllers.  A professional anthrax attack (spray 100 kilograms of anthrax spores out of a light plane, with agricultural sprayers, on a calm night) on Washington D.C. would cause some 1 to 3 million casualties, by OTA study before OTA was disbanded by Congress.  There is terribly inadequate medical supplies, decontamination teams, and treatment for anthrax.  Also, the prognosis is very poor, once one develops the symptoms, and one will most likely die even if treated.  In such a case of mass casualties and inadequate capability, triage is used.  This means that most of the affected persons will be showing symptoms, and will just be dragged aside to die, and made comfortable as possible.  In short, those casualties will mostly be fatalities.

  Then the horrendous problem of decontamination is there.  How do you decontaminate an entire great city area and built-up area that has been contaminated by anthrax?  The island off the Scottish coast (Gruinard Island), used for anthrax tests decades ago, is still "hot" and quarantined.

  The only way the system could come up with to deal with contamination of a built-up metropolitan area, was by spray.  So sprays have been developed which will kill anthrax.  They are harsh, of necessity.  To spray a large metropolitan and built-up area is certainly possible, but would also highly stress the aged, young children, those with lung disorders, etc.  In short, the spraying itself would produce some casualties and deaths in the sprayed populace.

  In short, in such a dire emergency (which is a certainty; it's a matter of when, not if), the kinds of decisions formerly reserved mostly to remote combat areas and military combatants, will have to be made for the civilian population.  In war, a commander may have to sacrifice a division, say, to "block" and hold a superior attacking force long enough to withdraw his other divisions and take up a more tenable position, saving his army.  But the division receiving the hold order, goes to its certain death.

  Unfortunately (and this is a crime against all humanity), modern war has seen now the rise of the direct strategic threat to our civilian populations and large metropolitan centers.  Strategic war has moved from the distant battlefield into the heart of our civilian population.  And contrary to the bias of the news media (who have seemingly gone to sleep or are chasing entertainment and star status), the cold war was never finished, but just changed in type, complexity, nature, and targeting.

  In 1998 I tried very hard to convince officialdom to fund and develop the extended "time-reversal of damaged cells back to healthy cells" method pioneered by Priore, with contributions by Robert Becker.  We furnished full color briefings of the proposed technology, cited the numerous papers in the French scientific literature proving the efficacy of the methodology (in the 60s and 70s), and gave a simplified but proper explanation of the mechanism involved (which is also the mechanism involved in the cellular regenerative system of the body).  I included a full color briefing on the real threat, including the superweapons, tests, mechanisms, etc.  Sadly, all this fell on very deaf ears.  At the NIH, e.g., I never even got out of the "policy" (read: spin control) section.  No reply at all from CDC.  No reaction from the USAF.  A puerile reaction from the DOD office handling all counterbiological warfare planning and programs, that there was no proof.  Apparently they did not even check a single one of the cited hard French references, on work done by noted scientists such as Pautrizel, a world-renowned parasitologist who did many of the profound experiments, and Courrier, the head of the French Academy's Biological section.

  We pointed out that first generation equipment could save perhaps 70% of those casualties, and second generation equipment would save perhaps 90%.  Further, the equipment could be designed to be very portable, and treatment would be one minute, for three times one week apart.  Such systems could have been developed for perhaps 60 to 100 million dollars, in two years with a Manhattan-type project under a Presidential Decision Directive, which is what I recommended.

  All this came to naught.  Not a single scientist even called me on the phone to discuss it.  No one wished a briefing, or requested one.

  Officialdom is wont to use the prevailing buzzword, "out of the box thinking".  Frankly, they do not really know the meaning of the phrase.  Today it means "do the same old thing, but with a new twist of some kind and thus in a fresh and bright new public relations wrapper".

  To sum up, in my opinion at least two things are being done in the aerial spraying accounting for the contrails:  (1) practice for supposed control of global warming methodology, and (2) practice for large-scale aerial dispensation of chemical agents that are for counter-biological warfare.

  Incidentally, I had a two-hour conversation face to face with an engineer in the project building the anti-anthrax agent for aerial spraying.  So that part is absolutely confirmed.

  Best wishes and again my personal congratulations on your dedication, concern, and personal research effort.

  Cheers,

  Tom Bearden