I was very touched by your message, and as you know, share many of the same sentiments.  I'm also religious, though I do not wear it on my sleeve, nor do I infringe upon others' beliefs.  Most certainly I believe I must fully account for all my actions, and that accounting will be such that no sharp lawyer can twist it.    

Presently I'm very limited on comments with respect to the weapons.  Certainly SecDef Cohen at least finally confirmed the earlier weapons (the scalar interferometry) in 1997:  He said:    

"Others [terrorists] are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves… So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations…It's real, and that's the reason why we have to intensify our [counterterrorism] efforts."  

Secretary of Defense William Cohen at an April 1997 counterterrorism conference sponsored by former Senator Sam Nunn.  Quoted from DoD News Briefing, Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen, Q&A at the Conference on Terrorism, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and U.S. Strategy, University of Georgia, Athens, Apr. 28, 1997.

  Note that the SecDef did not speak the words in the square blocks.  Those were apparently added later, as "spin control" to soften the impact, as if only a few terrorist groups had the weapons.  To the contrary, quite a few nations now have them.

  Also, just about every major weapons lab on Earth has finally discovered longitudinal EM waves, it appears.  A little openly, and a lot of it behind the scenes, there seems to be intense work on these "earlier" weapons, by a number of countries.  But at present, to my knowledge, the most powerful weapons on earth are the quantum potential weapons I first wrote about in Gravitobiology.  Three nations have them:  Brazil, Russia (under ruthless KGB control, not in the regular armed forces), and the "friendly little nation".  Presently China either is just getting them or is very close to getting them.  China has certainly had longitudinal EM wave weapons (interferometer weapons) for some decades.  Lunev put in a thing in his book which clearly shows that.  Since the Chinese produce excellent scientists, it follows that they are very close on the quantum potential weapons as well, if they have not already produced them.  The Chinese also seem to have recently deployed another weapon, an extraordinary type of electromagnetic pulse weapon, but one which uses negative energy pulses instead of positive energy pulses.  The effect can be devastating, and in struck targets (which may be biological systems, tanks, missiles, ships, aircraft, etc.) the effect is to suddenly stop the electrons from flowing in the circuits (and human bodies).  This weapon is, I believe, an order of magnitude more useful than the neutron bomb, and does not involve nuclear materials and nuclear explosions.  I have started differentiating these weapons from normal EMP1 weapons by calling them EMP2 weapons.  I also believe the KGB (Russians) have them.  China has massed missile artillery toward Taiwan, and has just held invasion type exercises on an Island close to Taiwan.  Someday, the Chinese will definitely move against Taiwan, in my opinion.  It could come as early as next year, if we have a war in the MidEast, which now seems nearly inevitable.  On the other hand, the Chinese are perfectly capable of waiting till after the Olympics, since they now are chosen as the host.

  As far as the MEG, what we have is a successful laboratory experiment.  A year of intense research is still required, in order to be ready to scale-up and produce a variety of commercial power systems.  The research required will also require a major laboratory effort, not just some electronics work.  We know the work to be done, and have already solved the major remaining problem in that area, but now the phenomenology must be worked out, using several highly scientific skills.  It is more than just electronics, and involves several different areas of advanced physics.  We have started that effort in a foreign country, a little more slowly than desired, but still in motion and slowly beginning to progress.

  Meanwhile, working with the AIAS, the AIAS is solidly putting energy from the vacuum into the hard scientific literature.  Here are some pertinent references:

•   M. W. Evans, P. K. Anastasovski, T. E. Bearden et al., "Explanation of the Motionless Electromagnetic Generator with O(3) Electrodynamics," Foundations of Physics Letters, 14(1), Feb. 2001, p. 87-94.  
  
  

•   M. W. Evans, P. K. Anastasovski, T. E. Bearden et al., "Explanation of the Motionless Electromagnetic Generator with  the Sachs Theory of Electrodynamics," Foundations of Physics Letters, 14(4), 2001, p. 387-393 (in press).
  
  

•   M. W. Evans, P. K. Anastasovski, T. E. Bearden et al., "Operator Derivation of the Gauge Invariant Proca and Lehnert Equation: Elimination of the Lorentz Condition," Foundations of Physics, 39(7), 2000, p. 1123-1130.  
  
  

•   M. W. Evans, P. K. Anastasovski, T. E. Bearden et al., "Effect of Vacuum Energy on the Atomic Spectra," Foundations of Physics Letters, 13(3), June 2000, p. 289-296.  
  
  

•   M. W. Evans, P. K. Anastasovski, T. E. Bearden et al., "Runaway Solutions of the Lehnert Equations: The Possibility of Extracting Energy from the Vacuum," Optik, 111(9), 2000, p. 407-409.  
  
  

•   M. W. Evans, P. K. Anastasovski, T. E. Bearden et al., "Classical Electrodynamics Without the Lorentz Condition: Extracting Energy from the Vacuum," Physica Scripta 61(5), May 2000, p. 513-517.
  
  

•   Bearden, T. E., "Energy from the Active Vacuum: The Motionless Electromagnetic Generator," in M. W. Evans (Ed.), Modern Nonlinear Optics, Second Edition, Wiley, 2002, 3 vols. (in press), comprising a Special Topic issue as Vol. 114, I. Prigogine and S. A. Rice (series eds.), Advances in Chemical Physics, Wiley, ongoing.  
  
  

•   Bearden, T. E.  "Extracting and Using Electromagnetic Energy from the Active Vacuum," in M. W. Evans (ed.), Modern Nonlinear Optics, Second Edition, Wiley, 2002, 3 vols. (in press), comprising a Special Topic issue as vol. 114,  I. Prigogine and S. A. Rice (series eds.), Advances in Chemical Physics, Wiley, ongoing.  
  
  

•   Bearden, T. E., "The Unnecessary Energy Crisis: How to Solve It Quickly," ADAS Position Paper, June 2000. http://www.ott.doe.gov/electromagnetic/papersbooks.html.  Also on http://www.cheniere.org.  
  
  

•   Bearden, T. E.  "Bedini's Method For Forming Negative Resistors In Batteries," Proceedings of Congress 2000, St. Petersburg, Russia, Vol. 1, July 2000, p. 24-38.  Also published in Journal of New Energy, 5(1), Summer 2000, p. 24-38.  It is also carried on DoE website http://www.ott.doe.gov/electromagnetic/papersbooks.html and on http://www.cheniere.org.

  Also, in 2000 I solved what has been called the most difficult problem in electrodynamics, that problem of the source charge and its associated fields and potentials, with their energy, filling all space.  This is the paper that shows how every charge and every dipole in the universe is continuously extracting EM energy from the vacuum, and pouring it out in all directions continuously.  The charges and dipoles in matter have been doing this for some 14 billion years or so.  The paper is:

•   Bearden, T. E.  "Giant Negentropy from the Common Dipole," Proceedings of Congress 2000, St. Petersburg, Russia, Vol. 1, July 2000 , p. 86-98.  Also published in Journal of New Energy, 5(1), Summer 2000, p. 11-23.  On DoE open website http://www.ott.doe.gov/electromagnetic/papersbooks.html and on website  www.cheniere.org.

  The book is tentatively titled Energy from the Vacuum: Principles and Concepts, World Scientific, 2002 (in press).

  Anyway, have a good one.  I'm going to do some chelation therapy (oral) over the next few months, and see if that fixes the problem gradually.

Very best wishes,

  Tom Bearden