Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004
7:11 AM
To: 'A.J. Craddock'
Subject: RE: "Message for
Tom Bearden"
Dear
Dr. F*********
No
prototype was built or tested.
We worked
some 14 years on the Priore work, before finally deciphering the actual
mechanism used by Priore (which was a method of amplifying the cellular
regenerative system’s functioning). The cellular regenerative system is
still very little studied; most of our own medical research is fixed on
things like the immune system – which
is not the healing
function of the body. As an example, the immune system cannot even heal or
repair its own damaged cells.
The real
problem – in both physics and biology – is that the classical Maxwell-Heaviside
electrodynamics (CEM) used to evaluate the electrical responses and
capabilities of the body’s systems is horribly flawed and needs a
wholesale revision. Yet the organized scientific community and all
universities continue to propagate this terribly flawed model as if it
were brought down from the mountain by Moses on the stone tablets.
As
examples, the standard CEM and electrical engineering model still:
-
Assumes a material
ether, falsified in 1887. It does this by assuming charged matter at
every point in space, providing a “force field” in space (actually in
the assumed charged matter, not at all in mass-free space).
-
Assumes a flat
spacetime, falsified in 1915-1916. The slightest change of energy in a
system anywhere, constitutes a change in the curvature of spacetime a
priori.
-
Assumes force fields
in empty space, which is known to be false since force fields can only
exist in matter.
Specifically, mass is a component
of force, by the definition F
º
d/dt(mv). If there is no mass (as in massless space), there is no force
and there is no field of force. Simply see how the so-called “electric
field” E is defined: E = F/q, or F = Eq. When q is zero in that right
equation, F is zero also, but the E was not affected. It is still E, the
massless electric field as it actually exists in massless space.
Actually it exists as a curvature of spacetime (in the relativistic
view) and as a change in the virtual particle flux of the vacuum
(particle physics view). As an aside, isn’t it interesting that no
electrical engineer, no electrical engineering professor, and no
electrical engineering textbook has ever even calculated an
actual E-field as it exists
in space! Yet all purport to do so, completely erroneously. At best what
they calculate is the indicated intensity of the interaction of the
field (as it actually exists in space in force-free form) with unit
point static charges just willy-nilly assumed to appear at every point
in space.
-
Assumes that every EM
field, potential, and joule of EM energy in the universe is and has been
freely created from nothing at all, by the associated source charges,
in total violation of the conservation of energy law. The problem is
that a source charge or dipole continuously radiates real, observable
photons in all directions, as is easily shown experimentally. Yet there
is no observable
energy input to the charge or dipole. So the charge and its fields and
potentials confronts us with the fact that either we must abandon the
conservation of energy law entirely, or we must accept that the charge
receives and integrates energy in
nonobservable (virtual
state) form. By not solving the “source charge problem” but erasing it
from all the electrical engineering texts, the classical scientists have
in fact performed one of the most unethical acts in scientific history.
Eminent scientists such as Feynman and Wheeler have pointed out there
are no force fields in space, but it has been ignored. So long as it
continues to be ignored, then just so long are our scientific leaders
guilty of gross violation of scientific ethics – deliberately teaching
and promulgating a known set of scientific lies. This is particularly
astonishing since the basis for the solution to the source charge
problem – as I pointed out in 2000 -- has been in particle physics now
since 1957 and the award of the Nobel Prize to Lee and Yang. But in the
nearly half century since the discovery and experimental proof of broken
symmetry (which was a great revolution in physics), the impact of the
broken symmetry of opposite charges (any dipolarity) has not migrated
across the university campus from the physics department to the
electrical engineering department, and caused the professors to change
their horribly flawed model. It has also not penetrated our own National
Academy of Sciences, National Science Foundation, National Academy of
Engineering, Department of Energy, National Institutes of Health,
national laboratories, and universities.
-
By assuming the force
field in space, the model thus very neatly hides the fact that
unlimited energy from the vacuum itself
is free for the taking. Every charge and dipole produces
a steady and unrelenting flow of free energy from the vacuum, so long as
the charge or dipole exists. In 1903 and 1904, E. T. Whittaker showed
that any EM field or potential or wave decomposes into a much more
fundamental set of EM energy flows. So any “static” EM field or
potential is a set of perpetual energy flows, pouring out real EM
photons where the energy has been extracted from the virtual state
energy of the vacuum by the source charge. To use these energy flows,
one needs to engineer the situation similar to a “triode” (instead of
the leaky diode method now foisted by science as inevitable). With a
free “cathode energy flow” that can last forever if the cathode (the
dipolarity) is not destroyed, one needs only to pay for the “grid”
signals necessary to shape, structure, and control that cathode energy
flow (where the energy is being continuously extracted from the vacuum
itself). So the best way to do “electrical engineering” is to use the
triode method, first building up very powerful energy flows (this is
still force-free, and there are no forces involved!) Once the necessary
“force-free engines” (sets of energy flows in magnitudes and directions
desired) are shaped up, then these force free engines are merely
interacted with the necessary charged matter in a material system, thus
converting the “force-free” engine into a very powerful “force engine”
that directly moves and changes the mass system itself.
Anyway,
the cellular regenerative system of the body – which does the active
healing, under the control of the cellular control system with its
specialized higher group symmetry electrodynamics – is the healing system
of the body. And it does not use the terribly flawed electrical
engineering model, but instead uses the “precursor” engineering model that
the former Soviet Union called “energetics” and highly classified it since
it was used to produce formidable new weapons of eerie kind. Since the
cellular regenerative system actually uses the “force free engine” system
described above, and converts the force free engine to real forces in
cellular matter at all levels in the cell (including in the genetics
itself), then any method of amplifying this fundamental “precursor” schema
used by the body itself will provide an amplified method of healing.
Further,
any cellular disorder or disease or damage state whatsoever, has a
resident “engine” consisting of two parts: (1) the normal engine for the
cell’s normal healthy state, at all levels, and (2) the exact engine for
the damage or change to that healthy state.
By
introducing an amplified, exact anti-engine for the diseased state, and
radiating the body with it, the damage antiengine is overridden and
reversed. In short, the damaged cells are moved or changed back to
normal.Priore did not kill cancer cells; he simply changed them back to
normal cells. In theory, any disease or disorder of the body can be
treated and cured in that manner – and the Priore method was one method to
produce an amplified anti-engine. With greater amplification, of course,
his radiation time (usually perhaps two to three hours) can be
substantially reduced to five minutes.
This was
the proposal we put forward in 1997 to the U.S. counter terrorist folks,
for the U.S. government itself to develop such portable treatment units at
top speed, in preparation for the coming mass casualties that we will
experience once the terrorist assets already inserted in our country are
unleashed (with anthrax, smallpox, etc.). Even our own intelligence
agencies are now admitting that strikes inside our cities by “dirty”
nuclear weapons are probably inevitable. Contrary to anything anyone says,
presently this nation and all other Western nations are totally unprepared
for prompt casualties in the hundreds of thousands and millions, and the
present medical system is essentially helpless under such circumstances.
Alas, the
proposal fell on totally deaf ears. So the coming mass casualties will
happen inevitably, probably beginning about two years from now. As we
stated, the necessary terrorist teams and the BW agents are already
inserted into our nation.
Anyway, I
hope that answers your question and sheds some light on the subject. Until
the horrible CEM and EE model is corrected to include the pertinent
discoveries of physics in the last 100 years since that model was
“frozen”, then our medical folks will continue to operate with very
inferior technology, and countless deaths will continue to occur
needlessly.
Best
wishes,
Tom Bearden
Dear Mr Bearden,
As you extended the Priore Work and presented a portable version of a
scalar healing blanket
to government, can you tell me if a prototype exists and about medical
experiences especially in infection diseases?
Thanks
Dr ********* (dentist) France. |