| Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003
11:01:09 -0500
Dear Gustavo,
Glad you like the book and
finally were able to get it.
The mindset of the
scientific community has been set against COP>1.0 EM power systems for a
hundred years, erroneously trying to equate it with perpetual motion
working machines without the necessary input.
The standard electrical
engineering model assumes a flat spacetime (falsified since 1916) and an
inert vacuum (falsified for at least 7 decades). Hence it assumes an
"inert" external environment. That's like assuming a windmill is
sitting in an environment from which never a wind shall arise. In that
case, if one wished the windmill to turn and power his mill, he would
have to crank the windmill himself.
I am not knowledgeable about
what is going on in Argentina, unfortunately, so cannot advise you
there.
There is as yet no single
book or set of books that develops all the mathematical development of
the book. Instead, that development is still scattered in bits and
pieces through the physics literature. That is why I included such an
extensive set of references, so that at least the necessary mathematical
developments of the main topics can be found. A few of them, as for
example the negative energy aspect I included and the antigravity, are
not yet developed in that exact form. In those areas, the scientific
community has long turned its back and made simplifying assumptions.
Hence it sweeps away the Dirac hole (negative energy, negative mass
electron) and its negative energy fields and potentials. It replaces it
with the positive energy, positive mass positron, which immediately has
lost the "gold" one is looking for.
There are some books on
quaternions available, and there is at least one website dealing with
them extensively. Simply use a Google search to find it.
I don't personally know the
individual you asked about.
Usually it is rather useless
to try to dialog with professors, etc. who are already set in their
ways. Occasionally there is a rare one who is open minded, and with
whom you can discuss such things.
Always you will be faced
with the blunt statement that "it is impossible". One then points out
the problem of the source charge, which continuously pours out real EM
energy in all directions, without any OBSERVABLE energy input. But they
will usually not believe it, will not read the literature citations,
etc. Over the preceding century, this reaction has been raised to an
automatic "knee-jerk" reaction.
If one does listen, you can
point out the Bohren experiment (and many such as that, by Letokhov and
others) in negative resonance absorption of the medium. It is rigorous,
can be performed by any nonlinear optics or laser department, and puts
out 18 times as much energy as one inputs. It is done in the IR with
insulating resonant particles, and in the UV with conducting resonant
particles. One points out that, well, an IR heater that puts out 18
times as much heat energy as the electrical power the operator inputs,
is a very good thing!
Best wishes to you,
Tom Bearden
|