Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 21:20:52
-0500
Dear Ulrich,
I have not seen or
studied the type of acupuncture you refer to, so am not competent to
comment on it. As you know, however, the experiment is king in science,
and if the experiments work, then it is up to the theorists to try to
find an appropriate model to explain the results.
Unfortunately I do not
know of a way to measure the scalar wave (combined longitudinal EM wave
and time-polarized EM wave) directly. Since the heart attack last year
and continuing hypoxia, I'm on a quite limited schedule, and so have
just been focusing on energy from the vacuum, as in electrical power
systems. My present efforts are focused on trying to finish my book, to
be published at the end of this year or early next year. Presently I'm
working on a sort of Appendix dealing with the fact that COP>1.0 EM
systems conflict with classical thermodynamics, classical
electrodynamics, and electrical engineering. This of course requires
demonstrating why those three models are inadequate and proven to be
inadequate, and at least a good statement of what the major limits of
the three models are. All turn out to have very serious flaws,
demonstrable in quite straightforward way. Every charge in the
universe, e.g., already totally violates the foundations of all three
models. All of them, for example, exclude the common charge and dipole,
as strange as that sounds. But it is true. All of them also require
the assumption that a charge is a perpetual motion machine, freely
creating and pouring out observable EM energy in 3-space with no
observable EM energy input. We hope to finish this particular task in
the next few days, then get on with finishing the rest of the book.
With possible bearing
on your own research need:
There is an effect in
semiconductors, known as recombination time, which does and will respond
to changes in the time-polarized energy. I believe NASA has a circuit
somewhere that is used to measure that. It might be that a circuit
measuring the recombination time changes in a semiconductor would do the
measurement you seek, or at least give you very useful indications that
correlate with experimental results.
Another possible way
might be to produce an instrument which has two receiving channels that
act in interferometry fashion. Scalar potential interferometry
(longitudinal EM wave interferometry) does produce what we call normal
EM fields and waves in the interference zone. So some kind of
interferometry along those lines might be possible to develop.
In the various nations
of the earth, scalar interferometry technology has indeed been
developed, but as is so often the human wont, it has been developed for
weaponry --- to kill rather than heal. I do not know the extent of that
technology in the various nations, but do know that some ten of them
already have such weapons. Indeed, even the Japanese Yakuza has such
weapons.
As with any desired
new technology, its development obviously depends on developing proper
instruments. That is what is needed in the scalar EM area. The weapons
projects have obviously done that, but are clandestine so no information
is available as to the instrumentation technology, that I am aware of.
Another possibly
relevant area is this: In quantum field theory, as you are aware, there
are four polarizations of the photon. Two of these --- x and y --- are
transverse photons (at least that is how we model them). The third is
the longitudinal photon, where the spatial energy carried by the photon
is oscillating back and forth along the line of travel. The fourth is
the scalar or time-polarized photon, where the energy carried by the
photon is oscillating back and forth along the time-axis ict. In other
words, the scalar photon is a longitudinal photon with its energy and
oscillation on the fourth axis, rather than in 3-space. It thus is an
entity along the fourth Minkowski axis, and is obviously nonobservable
since observation itself is a d/dt operator imposed on an ongoing
4-space interaction. So the scalar photon is not an observable, because
nothing on the time axis is.
Quantum field theory
treats the longitudinal photon (in 3-space) and the scalar photon as
being individually nonobservable. However, the combination of the two
is observable as the instantaneous scalar potential. Perhaps further
thinking along those lines -- e.g., by some sharp young graduate
students or post doctoral scientists --- might suggest some methods of
possible instrumentation to develop.
That is about the
extent of my speculation on the subject. Development of such
instruments needs doing, but as always the question at any university,
etc. is, who or what fund will pay for the research necessary to work
out such things. In the private arena the same question prevails.
Sadly, at least in the
U.S., there are no signs that our National Academy of Sciences or our
National Science Foundation will fund such areas of research, or even
form "funded research packages" for the various universities to compete
for and submit proposals for.
On the other hand, I
have not performed a literature search in quantum field theory
publications to see if anything has been done in that area for such
questions. E.g., a compilation of a database on good scientific papers
published in quantum field theory and higher group symmetry
electrodynamics, dealing with unique waves or photons of such form,
would be useful.
Hope this helps a
little. I'm sorry that I do not know the answer to a good
instrumentation setup to develop for these and similar areas.
Best wishes to you in
your research,
Tom Bearden
|