Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 22:39:44 -0500
Dear
Mr. Wang,
Unfortunately I'm quite a bit disabled after my heart attack in 2001,
with continuing hypoxia and also developing pulmonary fibrosis. I can
drive locally, stand for about two minutes, walk about 100 feet, and
that is it. I cannot travel to any distance.
My wife
also had a stroke in 2003, followed by two heart attacks. So she is
disabled. I care for us, buy our food and bring in (neither of us is
able to cook), etc.
Note
also that I'm not a bench person, so I do not personally build
anything on the bench. Instead, usually I work with inventors who do,
and my job is to try to decipher the nature of the odd phenomenology
they uncover.
Just
about everything I know about scalar interferometry is already on my
website, in the books and papers, etc. That includes the basic
technical references.
These
days, what little time I have available is spent on trying to help
resolve the escalating world energy crisis, before it generates giant
economic collapses in many major nations, including both the
If you
have scientists there who are interested in relatively inexpensive and
fairly quick solutions to the energy crisis, I would be happy to meet
with your representatives in my home here in Huntsville and steer them
into the appropriate areas and projects for quick and clean and
permanent solution.
These
include:
(1)
Watergas (the mechanism for how to easily trick a container of water
to have the O-H bonds disappear, so that the water molecules in the
affected container fall apart into H2 and O2 gas, which can then
easily be burned directly in a slightly modified combustion chamber of
an automobile. Since salt water works well, one can thus take one's
"fuel" directly from the inexhaustible and free oceans of the world).
Dr. Kanzius has developed this process and it has been independently
tested and verified by a world authority in water chemistry. To
understand the actual mechanism, one has to restore the negative
energy and negative probabilities to physics that were arbitrarily
removed in 1934. The leading physicists other than Dirac hated it (you
can “unhappen” a thing after it has already happened and is physically
real), and that frightened most of the theoreticians.
Phase I animal trials have been completed, and the process cured
100% of all the tumors in the animals tested.
(2) A
method (already obscurely known in optical physics) whereby one can
extract excess usable EM energy from the gigantic curled Heaviside EM
energy flow component that is unaccounted but accompanies every
accounted feeble Poynting energy flow component. One uses a little
general relativity operation (negative resonance absorption of the
self-oscillating medium) to provide an output of some 18 times as much
energy as one inputs in one's Poynting energy input component. We
actually input the giant Heaviside component also, but it is presently
arbitrarily unaccounted.
The great advantage for
(3) How
to produce and use permanent magnets with asymmetric fields, so that
one easily uses them to assemble self-powering permanent magnet motors
and motor-generators. Any magnetic motor is powered by the broken
symmetry established between its forward mmf and back mmf regions.
Usually we are taught to put in a coil and send in extra electric
power that we pay for, just to break that symmetry. But nature does
not care whether we pay for the broken symmetry or whether we trick
the magnets into providing it automatically. This process seems to
already be directly developed -- and appropriated and stopped -- by
the U.S. Department of Energy. Simply check out these patents:
(b) Vijak K. Chandhok, WO/2001/084569 A1) “Method for Producing
through Extrusion an Anisotropic Magnet with High Energy Product”,
International patent, 9 Mar. 2001.
Note (quoting): “This invention was made with government support under
a small business research and development grant for "A Simple Process
to Manufacture Grain Aligned Permanent Magnets" awarded by the U. S.
Department of Energy (Grant No. DE-FG02-97-ER82313). The Government
has certain rights to this invention.”
(c) Vijak K. Chandhok, “Method for producing through extrusion an
anisotropic magnet with high energy product”, U.S. Patent No.
6,787,083 issued on Sep. 7, 2004.
There
are others; see the paper on my website that discusses the solutions
to the present energy crisis, permanently and cleanly and cheaply and
quickly.
Hope
this is of interest to you. The entire world needs the "free energy
from the vacuum" development, and it would be of enormous benefit to
all the nations and peoples of the earth if
If so,
there will never be an energy crisis as long as humanity endures,
anywhere on this planet.
Very
best wishes,
Tom Bearden, Ph.D.
P.S. I
enclose a slightly altered letter below, sent to a pesky but very
expensive energy publication, which may be of interest to you also.
-----------------------------------------------------
Dear
(publication):
I don’t
see anything of real interest in your publication; just the standard
stuff. You don’t really have a single writer who understands the cause
of the world energy crisis, what
really caused it in
1892, and what to do about it. And you are probably not going to have
such a writer.
Put it
this way. We’ve had group theory in our universities since 1870. One
who gets a doctorate in physics will know some group theory, whereas
our electrical engineers normally will not, even with a doctorate.
Ugh! So what has group theory (and lack of knowledge of it by our
electrical power engineers) got to do with the world energy crisis?
The answer is, “Everything!”
Maxwell’s theory is a higher group theory electrodynamics. It was
never adopted in the universities, because folks at the time hated
those bloody quaternions with a passion, even though Maxwell loved
them. Why -- electricians would say -- the poor electricians are lucky
if they have had university algebra and calculus, without such a
horrendous mess as quaternions! Since there were less than three dozen
“electricians” (what we would call “electrodynamicists”) in the
world’s universities at the time, then that attitude and reception
doomed Maxwell’s actual theory – which is some 20 quaternion and
quaternion-like equations in 20 unknowns. You can do LOTS of things in
Maxwell’s original theory that are absolutely impossible in the highly
curtailed electrical engineering model.
His
theory is given in James Clerk Maxwell, "A
Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field," Royal Society
Transactions, Vol. CLV, 1865, p 459. Read Dec. 8, 1864. Also in
The Scientific Papers of James Clerk Maxwell, 2 vols. bound as
one, edited by W. D. Niven,
Maxwell
died of stomach cancer in 1879, with his theory never adopted.
Immediately some scientists jumped in and tore those terrible
quaternions apart – notably Heaviside (brilliant, but never even
attended university; he merely bought books and learned himself),
Hertz, and Gibbs.
When
what is today known as “electrical engineering” was then first being
painfully contrived and formed there in the 1880s etc., and was not
yet even born, they took Heaviside’s highly restricted vector
equations (NOT Maxwell’s quaternion theory) as the basis for the new
“electrical engineering” model.
Note
that, at the time, Tesla destroyed the vast DC electric power empire
being promoted by
So that
buried Morgan’s grandiose plans for a vast DC power financial empire.
An embittered Morgan vowed to utterly destroy Tesla as his mortal
enemy. That he did, and he also financially destroyed Westinghouse,
Tesla’s backer. At that point he had set the trap for Tesla. To
complete his grandiose plans, Tesla had only J. P. Morgan available to
finance him. So Tesla came with hat in hand to Morgan, and the wily
Morgan forced him to sign over 51% of all his inventions, in return
for financing him. And he deliberately only gave Tesla half the money
required, which doomed Tesla to failure because of he simply ran out
of funds. Tesla – the greatest inventor of the 18th and 19th
centuries – was then reduced to living in a little hotel room
essentially on charity of his friends etc.
Before
the full transpiration of all that, other factors developed behind the
scenes. That fool Tesla (who gave us AC power, the rotating magnetic
field that makes generators possible, and also gave us radio and many
other things) had discovered that the “medium itself was active” – and
he was hell-bent on producing free energy systems and giving them to
the world. So in Morgan’s view, Tesla had to be stopped at any cost.
J. P. Morgan set up the plan that did destroy Tesla, and he directed
his science advisors to also examine those newfangled Heaviside
equations and see if they still contained any of those confounded
“energy freely from the active medium” systems that Tesla was pursuing
so vigorously and planned to freely give to the world.
Morgan’s science advisors did a simple group theoretical analysis of
the Heaviside vector equations, and it showed that the Heaviside
original equations
still contained some of those
asymmetric Maxwellian EM systems – the kind that Tesla
had discovered that would accept and use excess EM energy freely taken
from the active vacuum (in modern physics terms) itself.
So
Morgan coldly ordered his scientists to “Fix it!”
Lorentz
– a great scientist but also a sharpie noted for appropriating other
people’s work and taking credit for it – was the one preparing the
equations to be used as the theoretical model for the new “electrical
engineering” that was to be launched in the universities slowly but
uniformly. To see that Lorentz was “approachable”, the reader is
referred to J. D. Jackson and L. B. Okun, "Historical roots of gauge
invariance," Reviews of Modern Physics, Vol. 73, July 2001, p.
663-680. Okun and the great electrodynamicist Jackson discuss the
roots and history of gauge invariance, verify that Ludwig Lorenz
(without the “t”) first symmetrically regauged Maxwell's equations,
although it has been misattributed to H. A. Lorentz (with the “t”) as
being first. Lorentz simply took Lorenz’s symmetrization of the
equations and used it and took credit for it. This is an excellent
coverage of the history of who did what and when, and who got credit
for it.
So
Morgan’s science advisors got to Lorentz, and he easily “solved
Morgan’s problem”. He simply regauged the original Heaviside equations
to make them symmetrical (using Lorenz’s symmetrization but
appropriating the work as his own), thereby quite arbitrarily tossing
out all self-powering and COP>1.0 energy-from-the-vacuum electrical
systems from the modified
(symmetrized) Heaviside equations. He did this little
beautiful dirty work in 1892.
See H.
A. Lorentz, "La Théorie électromagnétique de Maxwell et son
application aux corps mouvants," [The Electromagnetic Theory of
Maxwell and its application to moving bodies], Arch. Néerl. Sci.,
Vol. 25, 1892, p. 363-552. [Also in H. A. Lorentz, Collected Papers,
So this
horribly crippled and mangled “tiny, tiny bit” of Maxwell’s original
theory was what was deliberately used by Lorentz to set up the
electrical engineering model, which then was gradually introduced into
all the universities worldwide and generated the present “electrical
engineering”. From the very beginning, it was deliberately designed
specifically to prevent engineering and developing electrical power
systems freely receiving and using their input EM energy from the
seething vacuum/spacetime itself. All EM energy comes from the vacuum
anyway, via the broken symmetry of the source dipole inside the
generator or source. But symmetrized systems use half their freely
collected “energy from the vacuum” in the external circuit, to do
nothing but destroy the source dipole inside the generator, thereby
shutting off the flow of EM energy from the terminals. So to keep
energy flowing, we have to keep cranking the shaft of the generator to
change the input mechanical energy into rotating magnetic field energy
inside the generator (courtesy of Nikola Tesla), which in turn is
dissipated right inside the generator to force opposite charges apart
and reform the source dipole that our electrical engineers build the
external circuit to keep destroying faster than they power the loads!
Burning
all that fuel to crank the generator shaft has nothing at all to do
with directly powering the external circuit! All it does is to
continue to restore and remake the internal source dipole and its
broken symmetry, which then extracts that energy from the local
vacuum, coherently integrates it to quantal size, and pours it out of
the generator terminals as real, observable, usable EM energy flow.
Yet our
electrical engineers of today are not even taught what actually powers
the electrical system, even though the basis for it was predicted by
Lee and Yang more than a half century ago. Their prediction was
immediately experimentally proven by Wu and her colleagues in Feb.
1957, and it sparked such a vast revolution in physics that with
unprecedented speed the Nobel Committee awarded the Nobel Prize to Lee
and Yang in the same year, in Dec. 1957.
In the
half century since that great discovery and revolution in physics, its
impact has not made it across the university campus from the physics
department to the electrical engineering department.
And
that horribly mangled, crippled piece of theoretical junk called
“electrical engineering” is still being taught in every university as
the official electrical engineering model equations. All that set-up
to deliberately cripple all future electrical engineering was done
before there was any such thing as modern physics, which was not even
born at the time. Indeed, that’s about the time the physicists finally
discovered the electron, and they were still arguing fiercely whether
or not such a thing as an “atom” existed. They had only recently and
begrudgingly accepted the molecule!
That
horrible and mutilated old electrical engineering model of today
contains more than a dozen known falsities (absolute lies), pointed
out by Nobel Prize winners and eminent scientists to no avail
whatsoever. The pundits in control of things still want us to keep
burning all that coal, oil, etc. and vastly enriching their coffers
and their financial control. As a single example, there are no force
fields in massless space, because mass is a component of force by the
simple equation F = d/dt(mv). Put in m = 0 for massless space, and
immediately F = 0. But the silly electrical engineer is still taught
that there are “force fields in space”.
At
least J. D. Jackson – a renowned classical electrodynamicist – admits
that the force field in vacuum is merely assumed, then sweeps the
problem away. Quoting
"Most classical electrodynamicists continue to adhere to the notion th
Then
Morgan got another shock. That fool Heaviside (who was one of the two
men who first advanced the flow of energy through space -- before that
time it did not appear in the notions of physics) also discovered that
every generator and other EM power source already pours out from its
terminals, into space surrounding and along the external conductors, a
fantastically huge stream of real EM energy in peculiar form – in a
curled form which (in any special relativity situation) cannot be
diverged into the wires to power up the electrons. This is in
addition to the feeble
little Poynting component which does get diverged into the wiring and
does power up the circuit.
Well,
again Morgan fumed furiously. If our future young EE’s in all our
universities were to be taught that every generator already pours out
more than a trillion times as much EM energy flow as the mechanical
energy we pay to crank into the shaft and input, then eventually one
of those sharp young devils would figure out how to use some of that
vast energy flow output (simply use a general relativity situation,
such as the NRAM or negative resonance absorption of the medium
optical physics process that outputs 18 times as much as the Poynting
EM energy flow component of one’s input). And that would destroy any
further need for fuel etc. except for a tiny tad just to get started.
And that would have destroyed the energy barons of the early 20th
century, including Morgan himself.
To see
that Tesla knew exactly what he was after, we quote Tesla himself:
"Ere many gener
“Electric power is everywhere present in unlimited quantities and can
drive the world's machinery without the need of coal, oil, gas, or any
other of the common fuels."
“We have to evolve means for obtaining energy from stores which are
forever inexhaustible, to perfect methods which do not imply
consumption and waste of any material whatever. I now feel sure that
the realization of that idea is not far off. ...the possibilities of
the development I refer to, namely, that of the operation of engines
on any point of the earth by the energy of the medium...”
[Nikola Tesla, during an address in 1897 commemorating his
installation of generators at
"Whatever our resources of primary energy may be in the future, we
must, to be rational, obtain it without consumption of any material."
[Nikola Tesla, 1900].
After
Tesla’s suppression, he expressed the truth about the universal
electrical engineering model in these words:
"The
Hertz wave theory of wireless transmission may be kept up for a while,
but I do not hesit
Seventy-two years later, the eminent electrodynamicist T. W. Barrett –
also a cofounder of ultrawideband radar – rigorously proved that
Tesla’s actual patented circuits could in fact shuttle the potential
energy around at will, as Tesla had to do if he was to build his
asymmetric circuits and obtain free energy directly from the seething
vacuum/spacetime. See T. W. Barrett,
"Tesla's Nonlinear Oscillator-Shuttle-Circuit (OSC)
Theory," Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, 16(1), 1991,
p. 23-41. Barrett shows that EM expressed in quaternions (essentially
Maxwell’s original theory!) allows shuttling and storage of potentials
in circuits, and also allows additional EM functioning of a circuit
that a conventional EM analysis cannot reveal. He shows that the
investigated Tesla’s patented circuits did exactly this.
So
again Morgan’s henchmen got to Lorentz and had him “fix” the problem.
In 1900 he taught the professors to arbitrarily integrate the entire
energy flow vector itself (containing both the Poynting diverged
component and the giant curled Heaviside component) around a closed
surface assumed around any volume of interest. That very neatly
separates and retains the diverged Poynting component, while
discarding the giant curled Heaviside component. Lorentz also taught
them that this component could “have no physical significance”, which
is still the view today. E.g., quoting J. D. Jackson:
"...the Poynting vector is arbitrary to the extent th
To see
how easy it is to obtain free EM energy – all you wish – from the
seething universal vacuum, simply do this:
Place a
charged capacitor or electret on top of a simple permanent magnet
lying on the table, so that the E-field of the electrical component is
orthogonal to the H-field of the magnet. Then by every EM textbook in
every electrical engineering department in every university in the
world, the Poynting energy flow section assures us that this simple
gadget will sit there and steadily and freely pour out real Poynting
EM energy flow S, given by the simple little equation S = E X H. The
two dipoles of that contraption exhibit broken symmetry, as proven by
the award of the Nobel Prize to Lee and Yang in 1957. And as Nobelist
Lee pointed out, when we have a broken symmetry then something
previously “virtual” (subquantal) becomes observable (integrated into
quantal size). So that simple, idiotic thing – costing maybe two
dollars – is continuously absorbing free virtual photons from its
seething vacuum interaction, coherently integrating the subquantal
excitations into quantal size, and steadily emitting real, observable
photons (real, measurable, usable EM energy).
So the
simplest thing in the universe is to easily evoke – for peanuts – a
powerful “EM energy wind”. At will, anywhere, and it will freely pour
out that free flow of real EM energy wind until the end of time if you
just leave it alone.
Every
dipole – which is a known broken symmetry – does exactly the same
thing, to provide the so-called “static EM fields”. They are not
static at all, but are steady state outflows of real observable
photons. So the static fields are like an unfrozen waterfall. Quoting
the beautiful analogy of Van Flandern on the question of a static
field actually being made of finer parts in continuous motion:
So the
only problem is to build a proper “EM energy wind windmill” to
independently intercept part of that flow, collect it independently,
and then independently dissipate the collected energy in our loads to
power them.
However, that is an asymmetric
system a priori. Such systems certainly still exist in Maxwell’s
actual theory, but they have not existed in all of electrical
engineering since its very formation, back in 1892. That’s precisely
the type of system that Morgan and crew elicited Lorentz to
arbitrarily discard from the very mathematics of the electrical
engineering model itself.
Now
simply fund some sharp young doctoral candidates (in PHYSICS, not the
sad old electrical engineering) and post doctoral scientists, with two
or three sharp young professors, to go in there and restore that
long-lost asymmetry and thus those long-neglected asymmetrical
Maxwellian systems, and that simple and comparatively cheap action
will solve the world’s energy crisis quickly, cheaply, cleanly, and
permanently.
And
that is precisely why it isn’t going to be done, and why such
information has been deliberately withheld from publications such as
yours and folks such as you.
If you
wish the rigorous mathematical proof that restoration of Maxwell’s
asymmetrical systems will allow building systems that extract and use
free EM energy from the modern active vacuum, simply see M. W. Evans
et al., “Classical Electrodynamics without the Lorentz Condition:
Extracting Energy from the Vacuum,” Physica Scripta, Vol. 61,
2000, p. 513-517.
So what
is going to be done about this entire silly situation by our learned
Western scientific establishment? Absolutely nothing.
Hence
it would be very heartwarming if
Best
wishes,
Tom
Bearden
From: "Wang *****"
Dear Sir/Madam
It is my pleasure meeting you Sir/Madam.
My name is **** Wang and I am a Chinese
scientist working for a
weather station.
I'm on a research on the weather
controlling scalar wave interface
parameters, and I am willing to get my
Master Art and PhD with this
research subject. (Actually, I'm willing
to make desert into
useable land, and I think scalar wave is
the only chance for me.)
Is it possible to meet Mr. Bearden and
get some clear understanding
according to scalar waves?
Please allow me to contact with Mr.
Bearden if possible. My fellow
team members are very much have a desire
to meet him face to face
and fully aware of our research with
scientific understanding. We
will provide the air-tickets, hotel fees
and etc needed for
Mr. Bearden to come to
resort places and stay overseas.
I am sorry for the sudden proposal
without having to know each other.
Please reply with good results to
support our team's research or may
be world record project?
Thank you very much.
Yours Truly
***** Wang |