Dear Energy Daily,
I don’t see anything of real
interest in your publication; just the standard stuff. You don’t
really have a single writer who understands the cause of the world
energy crisis, what really
caused it in 1892, and what to do about it. And you are probably not
going to have such a writer.
Put it this way. We’ve had group
theory in our universities since 1870. One who gets a doctorate in
physics will know some group theory, whereas our electrical engineers
normally will not, even with a doctorate. Ugh! So what has group
theory (and lack of knowledge of it by our electrical power engineers)
got to do with the world energy crisis? The answer is, “Everything!”
Maxwell’s theory is a higher group
theory electrodynamics. It was never adopted in the universities,
because folks at the time hated those bloody quaternions with a
passion, even though Maxwell loved them. Why -- electricians would say
-- the poor electricians are lucky if they have had university algebra
and calculus, without such a horrendous mess as quaternions! Since
there were less than three dozen “electricians” (what we would call
“electrodynamicists”) in the world’s universities at the time, then
that attitude and reception doomed Maxwell’s actual theory – which is
some 20 quaternion and quaternion-like equations in 20 unknowns. You
can do LOTS of things in Maxwell’s original theory that are absolutely
impossible in the highly curtailed electrical engineering model.
Maxwell died of stomach cancer in
1879, with his theory never adopted. Immediately some scientists
jumped in and tore those terrible quaternions apart – notably
Heaviside (brilliant, but never even attended university; he merely
bought books and learned himself), Hertz, and Gibbs.
When what is today known as
“electrical engineering” was then first being painfully contrived and
formed there in the 1880s etc., and was not yet even born, they took
Heaviside’s highly restricted vector equations (NOT Maxwell’s
quaternion theory) as the basis for the new “electrical engineering”
model.
Note that, at the time, Tesla
destroyed the vast DC electric power empire being promoted by
Edison backed by J. P. Morgan. Backed
by Westinghouse, Tesla waltzed in and installed far more practical AC
generators at
Niagara Falls, much cheaper than Morgan
and
Edison proposed for their DC
generators, and the world found that AC power could be transmitted
down long transmissions lines very practically. One did not have to
build a huge expensive DC power plant every 10 to 20 miles! Thereafter
the world flipped over and went with AC power.
So that buried Morgan’s grandiose
plans for a vast DC power financial empire. An embittered Morgan vowed
to utterly destroy Tesla as his mortal enemy. That he did, and he also
financially destroyed Westinghouse, Tesla’s backer. At that point he
had set the trap for Tesla. To complete his grandiose plans, Tesla had
only J. P. Morgan available to finance him. So Tesla came with hat in
hand to Morgan, and the wily Morgan forced him to sign over 51% of all
his inventions, in return for financing him. And he deliberately only
gave Tesla half the money required, which doomed Tesla to failure
because of he simply ran out of funds. Tesla – the greatest inventor
of the 18th and 19th centuries – was then
reduced to living in a little hotel room essentially on charity of his
friends etc.
Before the full transpiration of
all that, other factors developed behind the scenes. That fool Tesla
(who gave us AC power, the rotating magnetic field that makes
generators possible, and also gave us radio and many other things) had
discovered that the “medium itself was active” – and he was hell-bent
on producing free energy systems and giving them to the world. So in
Morgan’s view, Tesla had to be stopped at any cost. J. P. Morgan set
up the plan that did destroy Tesla, and he directed his science
advisors to also examine those newfangled Heaviside equations and see
if they still contained any of those confounded “energy freely from
the active medium” systems that Tesla was pursuing so vigorously and
planned to freely give to the world.
Morgan’s science advisors did a
simple group theoretical analysis of the Heaviside vector equations,
and it showed that the Heaviside
original equations
still contained some of those
asymmetric Maxwellian EM systems – the kind that Tesla
had discovered that would accept and use excess EM energy freely taken
from the active vacuum (in modern physics terms) itself.
So Morgan coldly ordered his
scientists to “Fix it!”
Lorentz – a great scientist but
also a sharpie noted for appropriating other people’s work and taking
credit for it – was the one preparing the equations to be used as the
theoretical model for the new “electrical engineering” that was to be
launched in the universities slowly but uniformly. To see that Lorentz
was “approachable”, the reader is referred to J.
D. Jackson and L. B. Okun, "Historical roots of gauge invariance,"
Reviews of Modern Physics, Vol. 73, July 2001, p. 663-680. Okun
and the great electrodynamicist Jackson discuss the roots and history
of gauge invariance, verify that Ludwig Lorenz (without the “t”) first
symmetrically regauged Maxwell's equations, although it has been
misattributed to H. A. Lorentz (with the “t”) as being first. Lorentz
simply took Lorenz’s symmetrization of the equations and used it and
took credit for it. This is an excellent coverage of the history of
who did what and when, and who got credit for it.
So Morgan’s science advisors got
to Lorentz, and he easily “solved Morgan’s problem”. He simply
regauged the original Heaviside equations to make them symmetrical
(using Lorenz’s symmetrization but using the work as his own), thereby
quite arbitrarily tossing out all self-powering and COP>1.0
energy-from-the-vacuum electrical systems
from the modified (symmetrized)
Heaviside equations. He did this little beauty in 1892;
specific reference can be furnished.
So this horribly crippled and
mangled “tiny, tiny bit” of Maxwell’s original theory was what was
deliberately used to set up the electrical engineering model, that
then was gradually introduced into all the universities worldwide and
generated the present “electrical engineering”. From the very
beginning, it was deliberately designed to prevent engineering and
developing electrical power systems freely receiving and using their
input EM energy from the seething vacuum/spacetime itself. (All EM
energy comes from the vacuum anyway, via the broken symmetry of the
source dipole inside the generator or source. But symmetrized systems
use half their freely collected “energy from the vacuum” in the
external circuit, to do nothing but destroy the source dipole inside
the generator, thereby shutting off the flow of EM energy from the
terminals. So to keep energy flowing, we have to keep cranking the
shaft of the generator to change the input mechanical energy into
rotating magnetic field energy inside the generator (courtesy of
Nikola Tesla), which in turn is dissipated right inside the generator
to force opposite charges apart and reform the source dipole that our
electrical engineers build the external circuit to keep destroying
faster than they power the loads!
Burning all that fuel to crank the
generator shaft has nothing at all to do with directly powering the
external circuit! All it does is to continue to restore and remake the
internal source dipole and its broken symmetry, that then extracts
that energy from the local vacuum and pours it out of the generator
terminals.
Ha! Electrical engineers are not
even taught what actually powers the electrical system, even though
the basis for it was predicted by Lee and Yang more than a half
century ago, immediately experimentally proven by Wu and her
colleagues in Feb. 1957, and which sparked such a vast revolution in
physics that with unprecedented speed the Nobel Committee awarded the
Nobel Prize to Lee and Yang in the same year, in Dec. 1957.
In the half century since that
great discovery and revolution in physics, its impact has not made it
across the university campus from the physics department to the
electrical engineering department. Go figure!
And that horribly mangled,
crippled piece of theoretical junk is still being taught in every
university as the official electrical engineering model equations. All
that set-up to deliberately cripple all future electrical engineering
was done before there was any such thing as modern physics, which was
not even born at the time. Indeed, that’s about the time the
physicists finally discovered the electron, and they were still
arguing fiercely whether or not such a thing as an “atom” existed.
They had only recently and begrudgingly accepted the molecule!
That horrible and mutilated old
electrical engineering model of today contains more than a dozen known
falsities (absolute lies), pointed out by Nobel Prize winners and
eminent scientists to no avail whatsoever. The pundits in control of
things still want you to keep burning that coal, oil, etc. and vastly
enriching their coffers and control. As a single example, there are no
force fields in massless space, because mass is a component of force
by the simple equation F = d/dt(mv). Put in m = 0 for massless space,
and immediately F = 0. But the silly electrical engineer is still
taught “force fields in space”.
At least J. D. Jackson – a
renowned electrodynamicist – admits that the force field in vacuum is
merely assumed, then sweeps the problem away. Quoting
Jackson:
"Most classical electrodynamicists
continue to adhere to the notion that
the EM force field exists as such in the vacuum, but do admit that
physically measurable quantities such as force somehow involve the
product of charge and field." [J.
D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, Second Edition, Wiley,
1975, p. 249].
Then Morgan got another shock.
That fool Heaviside (who was one of the two men who first advanced the
flow of energy through space -- before that time it did not appear in
the notions of physics) also discovered that every generator and other
EM power source already pours out from its terminals, into space
surrounding and along the external conductors, a fantastically huge
stream of real EM energy in peculiar form – in a curled form which (in
any special relativity situation) cannot be diverged into the wires to
power up the electrons. This is in
addition to the feeble
little Poynting component which does get diverged into the wiring and
does power up the circuit.
Well, again Morgan fumed
furiously. If our future young EE’s in all our universities were to be
taught that every generator already pours out more than a trillion
times as much EM energy flow as the mechanical energy we pay to crank
into the shaft and input, then eventually one of those sharp young
devils would figure out how to use some of that vast energy flow
output (simply use a general relativity situation, such as the NRAM or
negative resonance absorption of the medium optical physics process
that outputs 18 times as much as the Poynting EM energy flow component
of one’s input). And that would destroy any further need for fuel etc.
except for a tiny tad just to get started. And that would have
destroyed the energy barons of the early 20th century,
including Morgan himself.
To see that Tesla knew exactly
what he was after, we quote Tesla himself:
"Ere many generations
pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable
at any point in the
universe. This idea is not novel... We find it in the delightful
myth of Antheus, who derives power from the earth; we find it among
the subtle speculations
of one of your splendid mathematicians...Throughout
space there is energy. Is this energy static
or kinetic? If static our
hopes are in vain; if kinetic – and this we know it is, for certain
– then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in
attaching their machinery
to the very wheelwork of nature."
[Nikola Tesla, in a speech in
New York to the American
Institute of
Electrical Engineers,
1891.].
“Electric power is everywhere
present in unlimited quantities and can drive the world's machinery
without the need of coal, oil, gas, or any other of the common
fuels."
“We have to evolve means for
obtaining energy from stores which are forever inexhaustible, to
perfect methods which do not imply consumption and waste of any
material whatever. I now feel sure that the realization of that idea
is not far off. ...the possibilities of the development I refer to,
namely, that of the operation of engines on any point of the earth
by the energy of the medium...”
[Nikola Tesla, during an address in 1897 commemorating his
installation of generators at
Niagara Falls.].
"Whatever our resources of primary
energy may be in the future, we must, to be rational, obtain it
without consumption of any material."
[Nikola Tesla, 1900].
After Tesla’s suppression, he
expressed the truth about the universal electrical engineering model
in these words:
"The
Hertz wave theory of wireless transmission may be kept up for a
while, but I do not hesitate
to say that in a short
time it will be recognized as one of the most remarkable and
inexplicable aberrations
of the scientific mind which has ever been recorded in history."
[Nikola Tesla, "The True Wireless,” Electrical Experimenter,
May 1919.]
Seventy-two years later, the
eminent electrodynamicist Barrett – also cofounder of ultrawideband
radar – rigorously proved that Tesla’s actual patented circuits could
in fact shuttle the potential energy around at will, as Tesla had to
do if he was to build his asymmetric circuits and obtain free energy
directly from the seething vacuum/spacetime. See T. W. Barrett,
"Tesla's Nonlinear Oscillator-Shuttle-Circuit (OSC)
Theory," Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, 16(1), 1991,
p. 23-41. Barrett shows that EM expressed in quaternions (essentially
Maxwell’s original theory!) allows shuttling and storage of potentials
in circuits, and also allows additional EM functioning of a circuit
that a conventional EM analysis cannot reveal. He shows that Tesla’s
patented circuits did exactly this.
So again they got to Lorentz and
had him “fix” it. In 1900 he taught the professors to arbitrarily
integrate the entire energy flow vector itself (containing both the
Poynting diverged component and the giant curled Heaviside component)
around a closed surface assumed around any volume of interest. That
very neatly separates and retains the diverged Poynting component,
while discarding the giant curled Heaviside component. Lorentz also
taught them that this component could “have no physical significance”,
which is still the view today. E.g., quoting J. D. Jackson:
"...the Poynting vector is
arbitrary to the extent that
the curl of any vector field can be added to it. Such an added term
can, however, have no physical consequences. Hence it is customary
to make the specific choice …" [J.
D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, Second Edition, Wiley,
1975, p. 237].
Jackson’s
statement is true in any special relativity situation, since the
divergence of the curl then equals zero. However, it does not
necessarily hold in a general relativistic situation, where the
divergence of the curl need not be zero after all.
To see how easy it is to obtain
free EM energy – all you wish – from the seething universal vacuum,
simply do this:
Lay a charged capacitor or
electret on top of a simple permanent magnet lying on the table, so
that the E-field of the electrical component is orthogonal to the
H-field of the magnet. Then by every EM textbook in every electrical
engineering department in every university in the world, the Poynting
energy flow section assures us that this simple gadget will sit there
and steadily and freely pour out real Poynting EM energy flow S, given
by the simple little equation S = E X H. The two dipoles of that
contraption exhibit broken symmetry, as proven by the award of the
Nobel Prize to Lee and Yang in 1957. And as Nobelist Lee pointed out,
when we have a broken symmetry then something previously “virtual”
(subquantal) becomes observable (integrated into quantal size). So
that simple, idiotic thing – costing maybe two dollars – is
continuously absorbing free virtual photons from its seething vacuum
interaction, coherently integrating the subquantal excitations into
quantal size, and steadily emitting real, observable photons (real,
measurable, usable EM energy).
So the simplest thing in the
universe is to easily evoke – for peanuts – a powerful “EM energy
wind”. At will, anywhere, and it will freely pour out that free flow
of real EM energy wind until the end of time if you just leave it
alone.
So the only problem becomes in
building a proper “EM energy wind windmill” to independently intercept
part of that flow, collect it independently, and then independently
dissipate the collected energy in our loads to power them.
Ah! But that is an ASYMMETRIC
system a priori. Such systems certainly still exist in Maxwell’s
actual theory, but they have not existed in all of electrical
engineering since its very formation, back in 1892. That’s precisely
what Morgan and crew elicited Lorentz to arbitrarily discard from the
very mathematics of electrical engineering itself.
Now simply fund some sharp young
doctoral candidates (in PHYSICS, not the sad old electrical
engineering) and post doctoral scientists, with two or three sharp
young professors, to go in there and restore that long-lost asymmetry
and thus those long-neglected asymmetrical Maxwellian systems, and
that simple and comparatively cheap action will solve the world’s
energy crisis quickly, cheaply, cleanly, and permanently.
And that is precisely why it isn’t
going to be done, and why such information has been deliberately
withheld from publications such as yours and folks such as you.
If you wish the rigorous
mathematical proof that restoration of Maxwell’s asymmetrical systems
will allow building systems that extract and use free EM energy from
the modern active vacuum, simply see M. W. Evans et al., “Classical
Electrodynamics without the Lorentz Condition: Extracting Energy from
the Vacuum,” Physica Scripta, Vol. 61, 2000, p. 513-517.
So what is going to be done about
this entire silly situation by our learned scientific establishment?
Absolutely nothing.
Anyway, you need a good joke for
serious days like these, and so now you have one.
Best wishes,
Tom Bearden
