Subject: RE: Technical
Papers/Information Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 21:25:48 -0500
Dear
Mr. Pozo,
You
have the exact citations for those technical papers; you will have to
obtain the papers (e.g., from any good technical university) yourself.
A good university library to which you have access, for example, can
order them for you.
In
modern physics, anything physical, from elementary particles up to
atoms up to molecules up to materials etc., is continually being
CREATED AND SUSTAINED as an underlying tremendous set of direct vacuum
interactions. The vacuum is not an “emptiness” filled with virtual
particles and their activity! Instead, the vacuum IS IDENTICALLY the
virtual particles and their ongoing statistical interactions and
activities.
Adding
positive energy to the vacuum means adding positive energy to these
underlying statistical interactions that “make up” and “create and
sustain” everything. So one gets higher and higher (larger and larger)
changes and things and entities. This is true, e.g., for a cancer
growing in tissue. There are additional POSITIVE vacuum energy
interactions and their positive probabilities adding to generate and
sustain that cancer.
So the
positive energy vacuum continually “happens”, creates, and sustains
everything physical that exists and continues to exist, be it living
or dead.
As an
example, hold up an empty waterglass in your hand. How do you
automatically think of it? You think of it as a real, solid object –
very concrete and real – existing in an emptiness. And that is totally
false.
There
is no such thing as a hard, solid “waterglass” existing in emptiness,
because there is no such thing as an emptiness. That glass is actually
an entire set of those underlying and ongoing positive energy virtual
vacuum interactions with their positive probabilities.
In
actual modern physics, negative energy also occurs naturally, so it
means that the vacuum can also have NEGATIVE energy added to it. That
means that, if we add negative energy to a local vacuum, we introduce
the addition of negative probabilities in those ongoing sustaining
vacuum/virtual state interactions.
And so
a thing can be “unhappened” this way. Want to cure cancer? Dr.
Kanzius already has a cancer cure process based (unknown to him) on
adding negative energy and its negative probabilities to those
sustaining interactions continually creating the tissue and additional
cancer in it.
So the
highest thing starts “unhappening” first. The cancer starts
“unhappening” and just “disappearing”. Dr. Kanzius’ process is being
independently pushed forward by two legitimate and separate cancer
research institutes. In the phase one animal trials just completed,
the process cured all the tumors in the animals 100%. It is being
regarded as the greatest advance in cancer therapy in 100 years.
He also
applied the same process to salt water, where the highest and
strongest bond is the O-H bond that is holding together the H-O-H
molecule.
Adding
negative energy to the local vacuum in which the water is immersed,
starts “unhappening” that O-H bond first. So the water molecules “fall
apart” freely into H2 and O2, bubbling up together. They are not
explosive while in the negative energy vacuum region because, to be
explosive, they would have to form the water molecule’s O-H bond, and
that is severely suppressed.
But one
can just pipe the mixture of the bubbling H2 and O2 gases a few inches
out of that negative energy vacuum area, into the combustion chamber
of an automobile, and there the vacuum is again “normal” (filled with
positive energy) and the O-H bond is now easily made. So the gases
will now give very nice and smooth combustion to power the car, while
emitting only water vapor out of the exhaust.
Dr.
Kanzius had his watergas process tested independently by a world
renowned expert in water chemistry. This scientist ran about 50
rigorous tests, and at the end he pronounced it the greatest advance
in water chemistry in the last 100 years.
But in
the late 1920s and early 1930s, when the new physics revealed the
negative energy and the negative probabilities, the leading scientists
were astonished at it and very fearful of such a dreadful thing as
“unhappening” something sitting there solid. So they ruthlessly and
arbitrarily discarded it from physics entirely, including quantum
field theory and the Dirac theory. Dirac at first resisted and
defended negative energy, because it occurred in his own theory of the
electron. But he was so violently and viciously attacked (by Pauli,
Heisenberg and many others) that he wound up being forced to help
remove negative energy from his own theory!
But we
can solve the oil crisis (fuel crisis) anytime we wish to add back in
the negative energy, and start to deliberately apply and use that
negative energy vacuum and its negative probabilities to “unhappen”
the tightest chemical bonds standing in the way.
We can
also develop cures for all the diseases using the same process.
It is
incredibly easy to induce negative energy into the vacuum! Just fill a
region (say, of water) in a given spatial volume with very weak but
sharp RF EM pulses. Each pulse is a sharp gradient across a little
region of the local vacuum affected. That pops out some “filler”
electrons from the local Dirac sea holes, leaving the empty holes
which are actually negative mass-energy electrons which – as source
charges – produce negative energy photons and EM fields.
So one
adds a “negative energy froth” onto the actual structuring and
patterning of the local vacuum. In that case, the water molecule’s
highest energy bond – the O-H bond – is “unhappened” and falls apart
freely, first. And that frees up the H2 and O2 for a ridiculously
small input of switching and control energy to make the RF EM pulses
“froth”.
For the
cancer, the “froth” forms on the exact patterning of the sustaining
biological region, and the cancer is the highest energy entity being
“created and sustained” by positive vacuum energy and positive
probabilities. So the cancer “unhappens” first, thus curing the
cancer.
The
process is adaptable for any disease condition.
Hope
this helps you to understand these processes.
Very
best wishes,
Tom
Bearden
Deas Mr. Bearden:
---------
This is Genaro, and according our
conversation on last monday I should appreciate you send me
information on the following papers/articles/ topics related to EM
energy:
a. "On the transfer of energy in the
electromagnetic field", by J H Poynting
b. "Electromagnetic Induction and its
Propagation", by O. Heaviside
c. "On the Forces, Stresses and Fluxes
of Energy in the Electromagnetic Field", by O. Heaviside
d. "Miles Walker - a Pioneer at
Met-Vick and UM/ST", by E R Laithwaite
---------
Some time ago I was trying to ask you
this:
"Does a unity biological cell (be
human, animal, plant) need to be in contact with vacuum in order to
accomplish its biological function?
in that sense "Should be feasible to
talk about the cell taking EFTV to survive?
---------
Best Regards.
GENARO |