Subject:
RE: TESLA's Electric Car Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:47:33 -0500
Hi Will,
Am attaching a little
“article” I wrote for the
website and sent to Tony.
This is an even further slight rewrite of
the article I sent Tony, so I’m sending this along to him also. Ugh! I
still have to edit and re-edit everything I write; sometimes it’s just
so easy to mistype “who” for “whose” etc. Have to scrub it a couple
or three times, just to get out all the “preoccupation” bumps and
lumps.
In the 1880s and 1890s, Tesla already
knew the medium was active, and that EM energy could be freely
extracted from it. He was hell-bent on doing it and giving the world
free energy. J.P. Morgan, allied with
Also, Morgan sought from his science
advisers what should be done to the new Heaviside equations developed
in the 1880s, after Maxwell died in 1879. The Heaviside equations were
being adopted as “Maxwell’s theory” since they were far simpler, being
only in vectors and not in quaternions and quaternion-like algebra.
These Heaviside equations were already a very dramatic reduction of
the original 1865 Maxwell theory, but unfortunately they still
contained some “asymmetrical” Maxwellian systems. And it is an
asymmetrical system that will freely receive energy from the active
medium, and use it to effectively power loads. Thus COP>1.0 and even
self-powering Maxwellian systems were still possible in the original
Heaviside equations.
Edison’s science advisor for some 10
years in his
Morgan would then have simply directed
his science advisors that the equations be fixed! Electrical
engineering was just being originated and “set up” here and there at
the time. Morgan wished to assure that the new electrical engineers
who would be studying these Heaviside equations would never even study
asymmetrical systems, but only those (symmetrical) systems which
self-prohibit using excess free energy from Tesla’s active medium.
The rising star on the formation of CEM/EE
was Lorentz at the time. He was a great scientist, but also used other
people’s work and received credit for it. (Jackson and Okun finally
blew the whistle on this, a few years ago in a paper published in a
leading publication).
So Lorentz was impressed to do the job.
He simply symmetrized (symmetrically regauged) the Heaviside
equations, and thus arbitrarily eliminated all “free energy Maxwellian
systems” taking and using free excess EM energy from the active
medium.
So from its very inception, electrical
engineering was already ruthlessly suppressed into the strongly
limited mold that would not interfere with Morgan’s expansion of his
empire into fuel etc.
Then they got another shock. To their
horror, Heaviside – one of the two discoverers of “EM energy flow
through space” simultaneously and independently of Poynting –
discovered not only Poynting’s tiny “diverged” component (of the EM
energy flow through space outside the conductors) that gets diverged
into the conductors to potentialize and “power” the electrons.
Heaviside also discovered that this diverged component was only a very
tiny component, and the remaining huge component was trillions of
times greater in magnitude, but in curled form. Hence, in any special
relativity situation, the divergence of the curl is zero, and the EM
situation is almost always special relativistic (unless one
deliberately adds a controlled GR operation).
But it just would not do for all those
future bright young EEs to be honestly taught that a generator already
emits trillions of times more EM energy than we input in mechanical
energy to the shaft. If they knew that, then sooner or later one of
them would figure out how to tap that mind-boggling Heaviside curled
EM energy flow component – and they would achieve “free energy from
the active medium” anyway.
Again, in 1900 Lorentz was impressed to
do the fix. He simply introduced a totally arbitrary integration of
the entire energy flow vector (containing both the small Poynting
diverged component and the huge nondiverged Heaviside curled-form
energy flow) around a closed surface assumed around any finite volume
of interest. That neatly “zeroes out” the giant nondiverged Heaviside
energy flow, while leaving the diverged Poynting component that gets
diverged into the circuit to power it. So this got rid of that “other”
problem that would eventually have given us Tesla’s free EM energy
extracted from the active medium.
The NRAM (negative resonance absorption
of the medium) effect was released by the Russians in 1967, I think
primarily to see if our optical physicists would understand it, and
recognize its connection to that long-suppressed Heaviside giant
curled EM energy flow component. Since 1967, our optical physicists
working with NRAM are not permitted to say “excess emission” of the
medium, but must say “negative absorption” of the medium. They are not
allowed to discuss the thermodynamics nor mention COP, but must say
“changes the reaction cross section”.
So in standard optical physics NRAM
experiments done every year in major university physics departments,
the optimized experiments show COP = 18. I.e., they output 18 times as
much EM energy emission from the self-oscillating charged medium, as
was in the POYNTING component of the energy input to the medium. And
no one is aware any longer that the experimenter actually input
trillions of times as much energy as is in that accepted and accounted
Poynting component, but simply do not know it (and most will not even
believe it).
Ken and I filed a
PPA for a heat
amplifier, using the NRAM process adapted to widen the frequency band,
but then getting – say – COP = 4.0 or so. And we hung it on our
website and gave it away to the peoples of the earth, in the hopes
that some group will quickly develop and apply it to solve the energy
crisis and the global warming crisis.
We proposed adding such heat amplifiers
to the established steam boilers (which are in most of our present
power plants) and a closed, clamped positive feedback loop that
provides self-powering once the steam boiler is up and running. By
applying this to all our steam boilers in the powerplants world wide,
then MOST of the present power plant consumption of fuel or nuclear
fuel rods can be stopped.
The process can also be adapted to home
and office heat pumps so that, once up and running, they become
self-powering and consume no additional fuel.
One could take a giant windmill farm and
reduce it to one windmill powering one generator power system. Then go
to steam boilers with steam-powered turbines, and use the
windmill-powered system to “jump start” the self-powering steam
boilers one by one. After jumpstarting, one does not care whether the
wind blows or not.
The same can be done with giant solar
arrays as power systems.
And it capitalizes on all the sunk costs
we’ve already got in steam boilers, steam turbines, and steam-turbine
powered generator systems worldwide.
It also almost completely frees us from
burning coal, oil, gas, etc. or using nuclear power cells, etc. to get
electrical power. It thus will very quickly reduce our dependence on
foreign oil, most of which is in hostile or potentially hostile
locations and nations and regions.
Anyway, hope you like the latest little
write-up.
Best wishes, Tom |