Dear
Gary,
The
five inventors of the MEG are as frustrated
as anyone else! We’ve sunk our money and enormous time in this effort
for some 10 to 12 years. So we have our own money and sweat
and work where our mouth is. It hasn’t been funded by selling stock to
the naïve public etc.
We are
not out of engineering development of the MEG yet, and to get through
it and into full production engineering would require about $10 to $12
million – money we personally do not have. So far, we’ve not obtained
the necessary financing. We did sign one financial deal, only to have
our last working demonstrator
promptly destroyed by the new folks in three days, against all our
instructions. So we had to legally declare that
agreement null and void.
Engineering the MEG, it should be clear, IS NOT JUST
NORMAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING. We’ve
made that point many times,
and specified exactly how the machine works. Yet the biggest problem
is that almost all of the
venture capitalists are either EEs themselves, or employ as their
second or third in command an EE, often with a Ph.D. in EE. And there
the problem is that one
cannot get across to the EEs that
the MEG is not just a transformer, and that
E-field radiations really
do arise freely from the space just outside the core, re-radiating
back into the core with a multitude of absorbed and reradiated
signals of all sorts of phases. Unless this dense signal environment
and its phasing is carefully adjusted so that
the phases are generally additive, COP > 1.0 is not possible,
obviously, since it means no effective
NET energy input
occurs from the activated
external environment, even though
LOTS of excess energy
is being radiated back into
the MEG. One doesn’t seek and cannot use just a “noise” energy input
from that external
environment! One must have some coherence, so that
the external environment inputs some
usable free EM energy.
So to
go from the business of slow, painful hand adjustment of the phasing
to automatic optimization
is certainly a “doable”, but it
is not a simple EE problem. In aerospace, our team (who
are all aerospace engineers with substantial and lengthy experience in
nonlinear systems) has worked for several decades on such problems,
and we do know how to solve it and finish the product so that
it’s ready for full production engineering. Bluntly, electrical
engineers do not
know how to solve the problem and finish the unit, unless they’ve
studied and worked well beyond electrical power engineering. The MEG’s
operation cannot even be
modeled in the standard CEM/EE model.
But the
EEs with venture capitalists (and some of our major national
laboratories also, by the
way) don’t seem to be able to comprehend something that
is already well-known in aerospace, in chaotic systems work, and in
dense signal environments work.
Let me
speak very plainly. That
lack of understanding of such systems, and the use of a horribly
fouled old electrical engineering model in our power engineering, is
why nationally we have a
horribly vulnerable centralized electrical power distribution and
“control” system that violates
almost every principle of multiloop servomechanism control theory in
the book. It isn’t just an EE problem; it’s a multiloop servomechanism
control problem. Our national
centralized electrical power system is so fragile and so vulnerable that
even a small portable EMP weapon (a “shooter”, as commonly known in
the trade), really good hackers, and many other simple things can keep
it surging out of control and collapsing indefinitely with ridiculous
ease.
If one
wishes a more accurate
grasp of the energy situation,
see Matt Simmons’ presentations
downloadable from the Simmons International
website. There you get the truth, not political fiction, and by one of
the firms that widely funds
energy projects worldwide. Further, a single scalar interferometer can
lay the entire system down
at will, and keep it down
forever. Since even the Japanese Yakuza have such interferometers and
have been using them since early 1990 to engineer the weather
over our heads (see Scott Stevens’ website for a meteorologist’s
beautiful presentation of
the resulting weather
engineering phenomena), obviously somewhere along the line they are
going to devote one of those interferometers to downing the entire
U.S. electrical power system and keeping it down. And when that
happens, there isn’t going to be any functioning centralized electric
power in the
U.S. from then
on, period. Easy to surmise the catastrophic
economic collapse that then
will ensue, paralyzing and defeating
the
United States
without a single missile, nuclear bomber, nuclear submarine, etc.
Our
fellows do know about scalar interferometers, weather
engineering, and the works – but they keep it so closely locked up that
most of our decision makers are not aware of it, even though Secretary
of Defense Cohen was briefed on it and publicly confirmed such weapons
in April 1997. Meanwhile, our present national
power system and national
energy policy are just a great
disaster waiting to happen.
We do
continue in our search for the necessary funding, with a financial
arrangement we can tolerate,
and with a financial partner who can understand that
he cannot just run in some good EEs and build a MEG and turn them out
like pretzels. Or in fact that
cannot be done with any other legitimate
COP>1.0 system, without the proper completion of Engineering
Development and then Production Engineering.
We
think we are again getting close to obtaining the necessary capitalization
for the MEG, but will just have to wait and see how it turns out this
time around.
Best
wishes,
Tom Bearden