Subject: RE: Re: Tom Bearden -
Watergas - BROWN'S GAS? Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:35:15 -0500 Hi Dave,
Brown's
gas is one name for a host of processes producing watergas or similar.
The watergas work, patents, etc. -- and suppression -- go back to at
least the 1920s. Several inventors today have legitimate watergas
processes. Two very interesting processes are (1) the process by
Boyce, which uses the Aharonov-Bohm effect to distribute the negative
energy in the local vacuum, and (2) the process by Kanzius. The latter
process has been rigorously tested by a world-recognized authority on
the chemistry of water, and he pronounced it the greatest advance in
water chemistry in 100 years. Kanzius first developed his process to
cure cancer, and his cancer cure process is being tested by an
independent medical research lab. In initial animal testing, that
process has cured 100% of the tumors in the animals -- easily and
without harsh effects, etc.
So we
wrote up some information on the actual physics process that is
involved, since that physics process was arbitrarily and viciously
removed from physics in the 1930s. There is at least some substantial
movement to restore that invalidly removed negative energy and
negative probabilities to physics.
This
means that, if the negative energy and negative probabilities can be
restored once again, then we can move into a revolutionary advance in
physics, which I call "precursor" engineering. It is actually the
"energetics" superweapons theory developed by the Russians shortly
after WW II and kept highly classified -- and used primarily to only
build superweapons.
Now it's
high time to put that major process back into physics, and go after
precursor engineering. In that way, we can very quickly solve the
entire world energy crisis and also the impending medical crisis
worldwide.
Let me
strongly refer you to Hotson's highly important two-part paper
published in Infinite Energy journal, the journal published by
the late Dr. Eugene Mallove. Hotson gives you the entire story on how
negative energy and negative probabilities were improperly and
viciously removed from physics in the 1930s. Quoting Hotson:
“I think if one had to point to a
single place where science went profoundly and permanently off the
track, it would be 1934 and the emasculation of Dirac’s equation.”
[D. L. Hotson, “Dirac’s Equation and the
As to
constructing a
In my
own case, my physical condition does not permit any further projects,
as my time and situation have become extremely limited.
Several
inventors, however, do have viable watergas projects, and are
proceeding vigorously toward trying to get actual verified and tested
units onto the market. Hopefully they will succeed.
Very
best wishes, Tom Bearden |