Hi Timothy,
No, the idea of a permanent magnet
self-powering motor has been pursued by many inventors, and by some of
them successfully. The Steorn group in
Ireland
had and have such a working motor, but did not understand the vacuum
interaction ongoing in the asymmetry of the motor. They also did not
understand that the local vacuum (and its interaction with one's motor
or other gadget using energy from the vacuum) can vary from place to
place, as pointed out to Frank Golden and I by Professor William
Tiller, former head of the Materials Science Department at Stanford.
Tiller had run into that specific effect and so had become aware that
one often “grew an archetype or conditioned form” in that local vacuum
exchange with one’s system. He himself had had a system demonstrate
this “growth” of Tiller’s “archetype” for his special detector.
Golden and I had run into that
effect with a Golden overunity machine which, when relocated several
hundred miles, suddenly did not produce COP>1.0 in the new location.
We were thunderstruck until Tiller explained it to us.
So the Steorn intended
demonstration at some little distance from the original development
site was catastrophic to them.
All such successful self-powering
asymmetric permanent magnet motors have been ruthlessly suppressed to
date. Latest highly suspicious “capture” of a legitimate procedure to
make asymmetric permanent magnets – and thus suppress the process from
use by our citizens – was by our own U.S. Department of Energy in
2001. Apparently the DoE has also kept this fact – the availability of
mass-producing asymmetric permanent magnets with high energy product
and thus easily assembling self-powering asymmetric PM motors and
motor generators – completely unknown to the President, the Congress,
and the American people. There's an article on our website here with
the three international patent numbers of interest. In the 2001 patent
where DoE “funded a grant that produced the process again, after it
had already been invented”, you can see DoE's statement essentially
assuming control of the process.
So the idea of an asymmetric
permanent magnet motor is certainly not new with me. The late Howard
Johnson, e.g., pursued it arduously for decades. He succeeded at least
once in achieving such a demonstrable self-powering model that I
personally tested for several hours – and shortly thereafter, that
specific demonstrator was promptly stolen from him by a night-time
very professional break-in to his laboratory in
Virginia. The only thing
stolen was that specific successful self-powering little Johnson
demonstrator.
John Bedini is certainly capable
of making such a motor, and he has done so in the past using his own
special methods. But presently he is vigorously trying to get his
advanced battery chargers into production and onto the market. John
and his few assistants are trying to do the work of at least two dozen
men, and my hat is off to him for making the most valiant effort I've
ever seen to get highly effective systems out there onto the world
market.
DeGeus suffered a “mysterious”
fatal heart attack when he parked his car in the
Douglas
International
Airport on his way to the
Netherlands to
sign a contract and receive very substantial funding to get his
successful “self-powering battery” on the world market and give us
self-powering electrical cars. You can take tourmaline and reduce it
to crystals, and get a strange effect. Each crystal is like a little
battery, with a positive charge on one side and a negative charge on
the other. In short, it is a dipole. And you can use a tiny little
conductor across that “crystal battery” to power a little bitty load.
Eerily, the crystal will continue to power the load and also to
maintain its own source dipolarity. In short, it will continue freely
extracting the EM energy from the local vacuum via the self-maintained
asymmetry of its source dipole, and thus freely powering its load.
Make a plane of such crystals
oriented parallel, and you will increase the available current. Then
increase the “depth” by adding other planes behind it, and you also
increase the voltage.
So if one gains good control of
the process, and can get to other materials by finding how to elicit
the self-sustaining dipole effect, then the self-powering battery for
self-powering electric automobiles becomes readily possible.
The watergas process is also again
very extant, and several inventors have working model systems that
produce COP>1.0 easily. Kanzius' process is one such, and his related
cancer cure method has passed initial animal testing with 100% success
(100% of the cancers in the lab animals were simply and easily cured,
without all the harmful radiation etc. and damaging to the animals).
For PM self-powering motors, in
theory you can also use "edge switching" (switch the magnetic field in
just the edge of a bar magnet, to just a tiny bit of depth) can also
be used to make the back mmf region and the forward mmf region
asymmetric.
The point is this: It isn't the
power that we externally input into a coil in a permanent magnet
motor, a coil judicially placed in the back mmf section to allow us to
break the symmetry of the back mmf region. That asymmetry – once
achieved by any means – is what actually powers the system! All that
inputting our paid-for energy to the coil does, is
produce the necessary asymmetry.
And the materials and motor and
assembly of the motor system care not one hoot how we get that
asymmetry to be there. Get it anyway you wish, and the motor will then
power itself and a load, taking its input energy directly from the
seething virtual state vacuum via that broken symmetry.
Every joule of EM energy in the
universe and in all our circuits is already extracted directly from
the seething virtual state vacuum by the asymmetry of the source
dipole. It is NOT the cranking of the shaft of the generator that
powers the circuit! All that cranking input does, is continually
restore the source dipole inside the generator that our electrical
engineering symmetrical circuits and systems keep destroying faster
than they power their loads!
As Tesla (who had discovered
energy from the "active medium" circuits three decades earlier) stated
in 1919:
"The Hertz wave theory of wireless
transmission may be kept up for a while, but I do not hesitate to
say that in a short time it will be recognized as one of the most
remarkable and inexplicable aberrations of the scientific mind which
has ever been recorded in history."
[Nikola Tesla, "The True Wireless,” Electrical Experimenter,
May 1919].
The 1892 symmetrization of the
Heaviside equations (erroneously taught to our EEs as "Maxwell's
theory") was specifically done to stop Tesla cold and prevent him from
giving the world free energy systems, taking their energy directly
from the "active medium". Quoting Tesla earlier:
"Ere many generations pass, our
machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point in the
universe. This idea is not novel... We find it in the delightful
myth of Antheus, who derives power from the earth; we find it among
the subtle speculations of one of your splendid
mathematicians...Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy
static or kinetic? If static our hopes are in vain; if kinetic – and
this we know it is, for certain – then it is a mere question of time
when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very
wheelwork of nature." [Nikola
Tesla, in a speech in
New York to the
American Institute of Electrical Engineers, 1891. Quoted from back
cover of his biography, Margaret Cheney, Tesla: Man Out of Time].
So what we should be doing in our
vaunted scientific community is coming down on our entire electrical
engineering establishment, and brute-forcing them to go back and
remove that insane symmetrization
of the Heaviside equations that Lorentz shoved on them
arbitrarily in 1892.
In short, turn all our young
doctoral candidates and post docs loose on the problem of developing
and using practical asymmetrical Maxwellian systems, and in two years
there will never be an energy crisis again anywhere on this planet.
Advanced physics (Nobelist Lee so
stated it himself) already tells us (and has done so for 50 years)
that when we do have a broken symmetry, then in that broken symmetry
something virtual has been and
is being converted to observable.
In short, any broken symmetry such
as a dipole or a charge with its surrounding polarized vacuum, is
ALREADY extracting and integrating real EM energy from the seething
virtual state vacuum energy it continually absorbs, and then pouring
this free EM energy (real observable photons) out freely and steadily.
It is astoundingly simple to evoke
an everlasting free
electromagnetic energy wind from the active vacuum.
E.g., just place a charged capacitor on a permanent magnet so that the
E-field of the cap is at right angles to the H-field of the magnet.
That silly 2-dollar gadget then will sit there endlessly and freely
pour out real Poynting EM energy flow S, given by the simple equation
S = E X H. That equation is
verifiable in every EM textbook in the world, over in the Poynting
energy flow theory section.
So for peanuts we can easily get
real EM energy flowing freely from the local inexhaustible virtual
state vacuum, and it will do so indefinitely. There is no free energy
problem! Instead, there is the problem of building and using properly
ASYMMETRIC collection and dissipation systems to power our loads.
To make a proper "EM windmill" to
intercept and collect some of that easily-achieved and real EM energy
flow, and then to SEPARATELY dissipate the collected EM energy in the
loads to power them, an ASYMMETRIC system is required.
So our inane electrical
engineering profession – since 1892 at its very beginning – has all
our electrical engineers building a SYMMETRICAL windmill, and then
having us pay to burn fuel etc. to input energy to the "windmill" that
does nothing but produce the asymmetry.
We've had group theory in our
universities since 1870, for goodness sakes! But if you ask the
average EE professor "What were and are the ramifications of Lorentz's
symmetrization of the Heaviside equations in 1892, and the continuing
symmetrization of these equations today as the "electrical engineering
model"?" Then the usual professor has not the foggiest notion of what
you have asked him or what you have steered him to.
And as long as our engineers
inanely continue to build only SYMMETRICAL Maxwellian/Heaviside
systems, then we shall have to continue to feed in energy that we
ourselves pay for, to produce the necessary asymmetry.
The energy crisis in this world –
and the tragic deaths of hundreds of millions of persons worldwide
because of their abject poverty due to no cheap energy for a modern
national economy – rests directly on the shoulders of our scientific
community, and specifically on the shoulders of our electrical
engineering community and profession.
Anyway, with the present rapidly
escalating oil prices and gasoline prices, this nation seems headed
rather immediately toward a great economic collapse also. If the
MidEast explodes (which is likely most any time now), that will
immediately chop off the rest of the MidEast Oil from the
U.S. and
Western Europe. And then we will not
be discussing the price of gasoline at our pumps. Instead, we will be
asking if there is a pump anywhere that
has any gasoline left.
If the big diesel trucks stop for
four or five days, the food in our cities will also be depleted (it
will not be being replenished daily by the big trucks). In that case,
there will quickly be great hunger, rioting, looting, and chaos in our
cities – requiring the immediate full application of a very rigorous
martial law.
Watch for it! Unless our
scientific community very quickly wakes up from its century-long
sleep, and gets its head out of the sand in its ostrich position it's
been in since 1892, then that's exactly what we are headed for.
Best wishes,
Tom Bearden
Subject: Question for Tom Bearden
@ PM Motor/Generator
Hello Tom,
I have several questions about the
asymmetric permanent magnet
motor/generator.
Can the Asymmetric PM Motor
Generator that you described in the 01
July 07 Technical Paper be
correctly called a Bearden Motor? That is
to say, is it your conception?
Will a piece of iron placed on one
side of a magnet to reduce the
field strength on that side
produce the desired asymmetry?
There are many different
formulations of NdFeB that are used for
neodymium magnets, each with
different magnetic properties and field
strengths. Can neo magnets be
used if the layers consist of different
formulations of NdFeB, each
successive layer having less magnetic
field strength (BHmax)? In this
case, different formulations are
compacted as thin strips in an
aligning magnetic field so that all the
domains are pointing north/south.
Then the strips undergo a final
compaction in a die, also within
an aligning magnetic field. The
resulting layered magnetic
material is then sintered and, finally,
magnetized to saturation.
Best regards,
Timothy
