| Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 
      15:41:29 -0500 
        
        Dear Aroutioun, 
        
          
        
        Please pardon my 
        unseemly delay; things here have been very hectic, and I've just not 
        been able to answer many of the E-mails and responses.  My sincere 
        apologies. 
        
          
        
        Very interesting 
        experiments, and I believe you have stated the interpretation of the 
        results correctly. 
        
          
        
        Probably the most 
        informative thing I can say would be the following somewhat lengthy 
        thing: 
        
          
        
        First, dealing with 
        the physics. 
        
          
        
        I believe there is a 
        new revolution in physics that is just being born, based on the novel 
        work by Michael Leyton.  (Michael Leyton, 
        
        A 
        Generative Theory of Shape, 
        Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001.  Leyton develops a generative theory of 
        shape that has two properties regarded as fundamental to 
        intelligence—maximizing 
        transfer of structure and maximizing recoverability of the 
        generative operations. These two properties are particularly important 
        in the representation of complex 
        shape — which is the main concern of the book. Leyton has originated a 
        new object-oriented geometry which includes the Klein geometry as a 
        subset. The primary goal of the theory is the conversion of complexity 
        into understandability. For this purpose, a mathematical theory is 
        presented of how understandability is created in a structure. This is 
        achieved by developing a group-theoretic approach to formalizing 
        transfer and recoverability.   
        
          
        
        The fields and 
        potentials are ordered (e.g., as a function of radial distance from the 
        charge, and a function of time of persistence of the charge). 
        
          
        
        So I think that 
        discovery by Leyton is as important as was the original prediction of 
        broken symmetry by Lee and Yang, and its proof by Wu et al. 
        
          
        
        Next, dealing with 
        consciousness. 
        
          
        
        In quantum field 
        theory, neither the longitudinal photon nor the scalar (time-polarized) 
        photon can be individually observed; yet the combination of the two is 
        observed as the instantaneous scalar potential.  So whenever one has a 
        scalar potential (common voltage), one has a "coupling" operation 
        involving "pairing" between time-polarized photons and longitudinal 
        photons.  Comparing to Whittaker's 1903 and 1904 papers decomposing the 
        scalar potential and also decomposing all EM fields and waves, one has 
        to interpret the "pairing" between scalar and longitudinal photons as 
        also a pairing between time-polarized EM waves and longitudinal EM 
        waves.  Then everything fits. 
        
          
        
        Briefly, nothing 
        propagates in 3-space, because nothing can move or change in 3-space 
        alone.  All changes must involve 4-space, and hence are nonobservable.  
        The RESULT of the change is observed, since all observation is a d/dt 
        operation imposed on an ongoing 4-spatial process, resulting in an 
        instantaneous frozen 3-snapshot.  Of course the process is iterated 
        rapidly (the common photon interaction does it, as can be readily 
        seen).  Hence we "see" what we interpret as "propagation" or "movement" 
        in 3-space, but it is actually iteration of successive frozen 
        3-snapshots, much like a common motion picture film. 
        
          
        
        First, we point out 
        that a classical "isolated charge" is actually surrounded by a 
        clustering of virtual charges of opposite sign in the vacuum, hence it 
        is a dipolar ensemble.   In the ongoing 4-process which cannot be 
        observed a priori, there is a 4-circulation of EM energy connected with 
        that dipolar ensemble, by the broken symmetry of opposite charges.  This 
        means that energy from the time domain (scalar photons) interact with 
        the negative charge of the ensemble, being transposed into longitudinal 
        photons which are emitted by the negative charges, but instantly 
        absorbed by the positive charge(s), to be re-transduced into 
        time-polarized photons again.
         
        
          
        
        The point is that what 
        we call "propagation of EM energy through 3-space" (since Poynting and 
        Heaviside independently and simultaneously discovered that concept), is 
        actually the iterative progression of that 4-circulation from 3-space 
        point to 3-space point, successively.  It is the circulation process 
        that is being propagated.
         
        
          
        
        In my view, mind 
        operations are time-like.  They are totally electrodynamic, but involve 
        scalar photons and time-polarized EM waves on the time axis (in the 4th 
        Minkowski axis, ict, the only variable is t).  So mind operations are 
        continually producing longitudinal photons in the tuning brain 
        activity.  We should really consider the "fields" in space, prior to 
        interaction with matter, as force-free fields and as longitudinal EM 
        waves involving oscillations in 4-circulation. When such oscillations in 
        4-space couple to charges (charged matter) in the brain and nervous 
        system, the spin and inertia of the charged particles result in particle 
        precession, which we see as (1) force fields (matter is a component of 
        force, by F = d/dt(mv).   The precession of the matter to and fro gives 
        us the so-called "transverse EM waves".  These transverse EM waves are 
        force field waves in and of charged matter; they are NOT the actual 
        waves of matter-free spacetime.  Maxwell assumed a material ether, and 
        the transverse EM wave theory still assumes that material ether. 
        
          
        
        Anyway, now we have a 
        coupling between the mind and the charged matter of an associated body.  
        We also know that a change in energy density on the 4th axis 
        is a slight rotation in 4-space, hence makes a projection into 3-space 
        (usually in the virtual state).  A coherent series of mind-changes thus 
        produces quantum changes in the physical brain charges, by coherent 
        integration of the charged particles due to their dipolar ensemble 
        nature and to the broken symmetry of opposite charges of that ensemble. 
        
          
        
        Given this physical 
        input of a real physical signal in the brain, representing the "intent" 
        of the mind, a series of these signals can be shown to induce physical 
        response/action, by standard servomechanism theory.  So the body makes 
        physical changes, because of the induction of real signals by the 
        special process of the mind-matter coupling mechanism described. 
        
          
        
        As a change occurs in 
        the body, it also is a small rotation in 4-space.  Specifically, it is a 
        rotation in the direction of the time axis, so it makes a tiny (virtual 
        state) projection on the time-axis (in the mind actions domain).  A 
        coherent series of such virtual projections integrates into "quantum 
        change" on the time axis (production of scalar photons there).  This is 
        the feedback mechanism from the body to the mind, and is the 
        body-to-mind coupling loop. 
        
          
        
        The time delay in the 
        loop and comparisons of incoming signals by the mind in its realm, leads 
        to an interesting phenomenon.  The time-delay gives the sense of 
        existence since many other changes (rotations from the external universe 
        and not the individual's body) occur during that time delay.  By 
        comparing its intent signals to the response signals received, the mind 
        operations establish two classes of "external phenomena": One which 
        obeys the intent signals or can be corrected by changes in intent, and 
        those which do not.  The first class of mindchanges produces the sense 
        of individualism, the "I", and therefore the personality.  The second 
        class of mindchanges produces the sense of "not-me", or the external 
        universe (which does not respond to intent signals from the body 
        directly).  So these feedback loops produce the sense of individuality, 
        of "occupying one's own body", and of simultaneously "existing in an 
        external world that does not respond to intent". 
        
          
        
        That was a brief 
        description of the conscious mind (serial processor's) mind-body loop 
        and sensing. 
        
          
        
        The unconscious mind 
        is totally conscious, but multiply so, since it is a massively parallel 
        processor.  Hence it has many such "individual loops" all at once, down 
        to every cell and every part of every cell. 
        
          
        
        All mind activities 
        are ongoing on the same time axis, and so during the same time 
        durations.  Some connections between these different "entities-minds" 
        exists by a similar integration from virtual to observable state on the 
        time axis, but below the integration of the individual's integration 
        looping. 
        
          
        
        The result is a sort 
        of "levels of unconsciousness", from the personal unconscious, to that 
        of the family group, to that of the community, to that of the nation, to 
        that of the human species, to that of all-species-on-earth, etc. 
        
          
        
        Now there does exist 
        the physics for the direct mechanism you are showing in your 
        experiments, I believe.  If we insist on Leyton's hierarchies of 
        symmetry, then all the information at the deepest levels -- both for 
        symmetries and asymmetries -- is outfolded from underneath to each new 
        higher symmetry generated. 
        
          
        
        This means there is 
        indeed a direct interaction between members of a species in one colony 
        or group, and that interaction should be measureable by group 
        characteristics varying due to that communication, when members of the 
        group are violently changed or killed, etc. 
        
          
        
        In my own work with 
        the Priore-type healing approach, and an extension to it, the Leyton 
        effect means that every cell in one's body actually possesses the 
        infolded "memory" of all the major prior developments of cells in its 
        lineage, right back to the first primitive cells formed on earth.  
        Further, when a cell is damaged, cannot get enough oxygen, and the 
        cellular regenerative system is unable to restore conditions so that the 
        cell gets enough oxygen, it still recognizes the hurting cell as its 
        own, but also recognizes that it must move the cell back toward its 
        anaerobic ancestry, so it can survive without that oxygen.  And that is 
        the main action (the actual mechanism) that generates "promotion" of a 
        cancer, once the damage and hypoxia are there for a sufficient period.  
        Since the immune system is also under control of the master cellular 
        control system (the one that Popp studies), as well as the cellular 
        regenerative system being under that control, the order for "promotion" 
        actually comes from the master cellular control system.  We are able to 
        describe the process by which the cell dedifferentiates back toward that 
        goal.  The first step is of course to go from "grouped cells" under 
        common control back to "individual cells" (which was the anaerobic 
        stage, by and largely.  Hence the first major indicator is the loss of 
        central growth control by the promoted (now cancerous) cell.  The cell 
        doesn't just "happen to turn into" a cancer cell!  It is not just 
        "ordered" to do so, but a physical "engine" comprised of specific 
        spacetime curvatures is formed upon the cell, to physically change it 
        back (physically dedifferentiate it).  Actually Becker's work with 
        potentials across otherwise intractable bone fractures is illuminating 
        in that respect, since it was the incoming red blood cells which were 
        first dedifferentiated and then redifferentiate forward on another 
        development line, to first pre-cartilage cells and then to pre-bone 
        cells. 
        
          
        
        But your experiments 
        have indeed shown that there is a special communication mechanism 
        between members of a species in a community group. 
        
          
        
        That communication 
        mechanism can be much more rigorously described and modeled, but not in 
        the conventional classical Maxwell-Heaviside EM theory.  A higher group 
        symmetry electrodynamics -- such as quaternion EM or O(3) group symmetry 
        EM, capable of also incorporating curved spacetime and vacuum virtual 
        flux interaction --- must be employed. 
        
          
        
        Hope this helps in 
        your work, and I also hope your presentations either went well or will 
        go well. 
        
          
        
        Best wishes, 
        
        Tom Bearden 
        
          
        
        P.S.  Unfortunately 
        the FCC (old KGB) in Russia has weaponized much of this approach, and 
        several other nations also are either weaponizing it or starting to do 
        so. 
        
          
        
        One of the 
        "weaponization" goals -- apparently still in the future --- is to be 
        able to directly engineer Jung's collective unconscious.  In theory, 
        mind operations and even personalities, memories, etc. can be directly 
        engineered and processed electromagnetically, if the proper higher group 
        symmetry EM is used. 
        
          
        
        The initial Soviet use 
        was for generating physical diseases directly, by incorporating the 
        "engines" (curvature spacetime patterns) for specific diseases, inside 
        the Whittaker structuring of the scalar potential (field-free potential) 
        or then later inside fields and waves also.  All present EM is just a 
        set of "envelopes" comprised of far more fundamental coupled 
        longitudinal EM wavepairs, where each pair is comprised of a 
        time-polarized EM wave (active on the time axis and in the mind realm 
        directly), and a coupled longitudinal EM wave in 3-space.  The long 
        "microwave radiation of the former U.S. Embassy in Moscow", e.g., 
        utilized the structuring (engines) inside the field-free potentials.  
        The exposed bodies in those field-free areas were actually in stable 
        field-free potentials.  Potentials superpose; so the automatic 
        supposition of the disease-engine-structured scalar potentials diffused 
        their structures through the body simply by superposing with the body's 
        own potentials (on the surfaces of the cellular membranes and everywhere 
        else, even deep inside each cell and on each part of each cell). 
        
          
        
        The Russian term for 
        this kind of higher group symmetry EM work is "energetics", which has 
        three branches depending upon what is targeted by using the work as a 
        weapon: (1) targeted against inert mass objects and ordinary fields and 
        potentials in them, it is called by the same name, energetics.  (2) 
        targeted against living bodies and their ordinary fields and potentials, 
        it is called "bioenergetics".  (3) targeted against the minds and mind 
        operations of living entities, it is called "psychoenergetics". 
        
          
        
        The present status of 
        the development is such that control of a person's mind and perceptions 
        (three examples: Captain's Button, Svoboda, and Hess) can be totally 
        taken over and controlled at a distance, even while that person is 
        accomplishing a highly technical task.  In other places we have detailed 
        what happened to those three examples.  This capability was originally 
        developed so as to be able to counter one of the special "dead man 
        fuzing" type assets of a small friendly foreign country possessing 
        quantum potential weapons and thus able to counter in that area. 
        
          
        
        Tom Bearden 
        
         
        
        Experimental Studies of 
        Information Transmission Between the Killed and Survivor Individuals of 
        the Same Population on Several Species as Representation of the Role of 
        Consciousness of Biological Species During Evolution  
        
        In order to understand how experimentally it would be possible to study 
        the role of consciousness in the process of evolution we would like 
        first to propose a hypothesis about the consciousness of the population 
        of living organisms. According to the hypothesis of F. Crick human 
        consciousness arises as biological function from interaction between the 
        neurons of the brain (Crick, 1994). According to hypothesis by V. Norris 
        consciousness is organizing force, which is involved in the process of 
        transmitting, receiving and condensing organization to a common pattern; 
        it is created by information and would act to create information. 
        (Norris, 1996). We propose a hypothesis stating that any amount of 
        similar units of living matter, which coexist together in relatively 
        close physical proximity and interact to each other exchanging matter 
        and information comprise a bio-informational network. Consciousness 
        arises as a result of constant information interaction between all units 
        of such bio-information network and serves as organizing force for it s 
        units to co-exist and function together as a single formation for more 
        or less long period of time. (Agadjanian, 1999). This information 
        exchange includes all known communication channels, like exchange of 
        matter, chemical signals, physical signals of different nature, as well 
        as it might involve unknown form of physical communication (Norris, 
        1998) defined also as novel non-chemical form of signaling (Matsuhashi 
        et al., 1995) or superweak electromagnetic radiations (Kaznacheev et 
        al., 1981). Thus any population of living organisms of the same species 
        from bacteria to human beings which co-exists together in relatively 
        close physical proximity and function together as a single formation 
        interacting with environment and surviving for more or less long period 
        of time has consciousness. This consciousness by analogy has to have 
        similar characteristics to the phenomenon we rationally aware of as 
        human consciousness. Consciousness of the population of bacteria 
        obviously would be much less sophisticated formation than human 
        consciousness, and consciousness of any number of human beings 
        accordingly would be much more sophisticated formation than human 
        consciousness. All these different levels of consciousness including 
        human consciousness can be examined as different spectrum or separate 
        closely interconnected components of single global formation the Global 
        Consciousness of all living matter on Earth, which can also be defined 
        as Global Energy-Information Network (Agadjanian, 1999). Such hypothesis 
        would broaden the hypothesis of spectrum of consciousness of K. Wilber 
        (Wilber, 1977) beyond the boundaries of human perception within the 
        system of knowledge of psychology, psychotherapy and religion and would 
        give a new understanding to the hypothesis of Vernadsky (Vernadsky, 
        1926) and Teilhard de Chardin (Teilhard de Chardin, 1966) about 
        noosphere. In case of some so-called social biological species like, for 
        example, ants we can rationally observe some functioning patterns of the 
        consciousness of local populations. In case of many other biological 
        species the existence and functioning of consciousness of local 
        population is not so obvious. However there should be fundamental 
        similar characteristics of consciousness of all populations of living 
        creatures. If we can point to the fundamental similarities between the 
        human consciousness and consciousness of the local populations of all 
        biological species we might be able to establish a new paradigm for 
        studying consciousness experimentally.  The interpretation of above experimental results is following. The violently killed individuals transmitted by physical or chemical signals the information about the fact of their violent death and specific information about nature of the deadly factor to the survivors of the same group. Based on this received information the consciousness of this population employed both nonspecific and specific defense mechanisms in order to survive the deadly factor. First, as a nonspecific defense the consciousness of the population increased the speed of reproduction, which was observed in all above experiments. Second, as a specific defense, using the received specific information about the deadly agent, the consciousness of the population activated the specific resistance to this killing factor, which was observed in the last group of experiments. In the last case taking into consideration that the pesticides Phosalon and Plinctran used in experiments on Predatory Mite, Amblyseius fallacis (Garman) as a killing factor were widely used against those species long before the time of the conducting of the experiments, it would be logical to conclude that the insects had already acquired genetic resistance to these specific pesticides and during the experiments consciousness of the population just activated it. But based on above logic we can assume that using any species of insects and completely new never used against them pesticide, it could be possible to establish the fact that mutations necessary to survive this new deadly factor would originate because consciousness of population will receive specific information about this new deadly factor from the killed individuals and would direct a mutations in the next generations towards adaptation to it. But experiments proving this statement could take several years to conduct, that is amount of time comparable to the time usually needed for species to adapt to a new insecticides in the real life.Discussion 
        
        Experimental studies of the information transmission between physically 
        separated groups of living organisms of the same biological species were 
        conducted before and after the experimental project Feedback . Several 
        authors reported observing this phenomenon in their studies and gave it 
        different interpretations (Kaznacheev et al., 1981), (Matsuhashi et al., 
        1995), (Heal et al., 2002). Hypothesis about the consciousness of the 
        local population of the biological species might add new insight to the 
        understanding of the results of these experimental studies. For example, 
        it could allow explaining the last studies by Heal and Parsons from 
        consciousness point of view. In these experiments the Petri dish was 
        divided into two compartments, connected by a five-millimeter air gap 
        between the top of the wall and the lid. In one compartment drops of the 
        bacterium E.coli were placed, together with various antibiotics. When 
        the other compartment was empty, the bacteria died killed by the 
        antibiotics. However, if thriving colonies of E.coli were placed in the 
        other compartment, the first group of bacteria survived. If the gap 
        between the compartments was sealed, the bacteria in the first 
        compartment died. Heal and Parsons concluded that the bacteria in the 
        second compartment must have sent some kind of airborne "survival" 
        signals to the dying from antibiotics first group of bacteria, which 
        helped them to survive. But form the point of evolution such explanation 
        makes only partial sense it attempts to explain what happened but not 
        why it happened. From the hypothesis of consciousness of the biological 
        species however the results can be understood completely logically. The 
        consciousness of one colony of E.Coly with huge dose of antibiotic was 
        not able to think what to do to survive. When another healthy colony was 
        put near this dying colony they would together comprise the viable 
        living network with common consciousness, which had enough information 
        and resources to be able to figure out how exactly to react to the 
        threat factor. When the air gap was closed these colonies again become 
        two separate colonies with separate consciousness and resources 
        resulting in the death of the colony exposed to antibiotic. Quite 
        possibly by blocking this air gap not chemical information transmission 
        was blocked but some unknown weak electromagnetic information 
        transmission, for which that barrier is impermeable.  
        
        The theory of the consciousness of the biological species using specific 
        and nonspecific mechanisms to maintain its existence in the changing 
        conditions of the environment and the results of the further experiments 
        with the similar to discussed above experiments of the project Feedback 
        could be become the starting point to allow the consciousness of living 
        matter to be studied thoroughly through reliable and repeatable 
        laboratory experiments. If we can examine from the consciousness point 
        of view several global current ecological problems we might be able to 
        predict the possible effective solutions of them. If we can understand 
        that by trying to eliminate pests with pesticides or bacteria with 
        antibiotics we are dealing with intelligent force the consciousness of 
        those species, which intelligently uses the specific information about 
        our killing methods to successfully defend itself, we might come to 
        fundamentally different methods of controlling harm from these species 
        with much higher efficiency, like, for example, completely eliminating 
        the key point of enemy defense the killing. Organic farming, for 
        example, already proved that products can be successfully grown without 
        use of pesticides and above theory together with results of the new 
        experiments might make a point for eliminating the use of pesticides in 
        the world entirely. With the pathogen bacteria and antibiotics the 
        solution might not be so obvious, but again realizing that we are 
        dealing with intelligent defense of the consciousness of the species of 
        bacteria based on the information from the dying bacteria, we might be 
        able to come to fundamentally different methods of controlling the 
        bacteria with higher efficiency. Using the same approach we can conclude 
        the global problem of overfishing arose in the first place from the 
        wrong methods of killing commercially caught fish on the ships out of 
        fish natural environment. The consciousness of different fish species 
        for many millions of years of evolution probably developed methods of 
        defending its numbers from the threat factors, which mostly killed fish 
        in the water. The possible solution obviously might be killing all 
        commercially caught fish in the water.
          Agadjanian, A. (1999) The Information God. Toronto: 21st Century Information. Agadjanian, I., (1983). Feedback And Plant Protection, J Plant Protection, 5, Moscow, USSR. Agadjanian, I., Agadjanian, A., & Agadjanian, V., (1990) Interconnection Between Perishing and Survived Creatures Information Leaflet of The Armenian Institute of Scientific and Technical Information. Crick, F. (1994) The Astonishing Hypothesis. New York: Charles Scribner s Sons. Heal, R. D., & Parsons, A. T., (2002) Novel intercellular communication system in Escherichia coli that confers antibiotic resistance between physically separated populations, Journal of Applied Microbiology, 92, 1116-1122. Kaznacheev, V. P. & Michaylova, L. P., (1981) Superweak radiations in an intercellular interactions. Novosibirsk: Nauka. Matsuhashi, M., Pankrushina, A.N., Endoh, K., Watanabe, H., Mano, Y., Hyodo, M., Fujita, T., Kunugita, K., Kaneko, T., & Otani, S. (1995) Studies on carbon material requirements for bacterial proliferation and spore germination under stress conditions: a new mechanism involving transmission of physical signals. J Bacteriol 177, pp.688-693. Norris, V. (1996) Neural processing results from competition between resonance and synaptic activity. Journal of Consciousness Studies, submitted. Norris, V. (1998). Bacteria as tools for studies of consciousness. In Toward a Science of Consciousness II: The Second Tucson Discussions and Debates. MIT Press, Cambridge, USA. 397-405.). Shrodinger, Erwin, (1967) What Is Life? New York: Cambridge University Press, (First published in 1944) Teilhard de Chardin, Pierre. (1966). The Vision of the Past. New York: Harper & Row. Vernadsky, Vladimir., Langmuir, David., (Translator), & McMenamin, Mark., (1998). The Biosphere, New York: Copernicus Books (First published in 1926) Wilber, K. (1977) The spectrum of consciousness, Wheaton, Ill: The Theosophical Publishing House. |