Hi
Jonathan,
At least
a dozen nations today have scalar interferometers, in one form or
another. These nations include
Russia (under the
auspices and control of the KGB),
China,
Israel,
Brazil, and
several others.
Rigorous proof of scalar
interferometry is given by M. W. Evans et al., "On Whittaker's
Representation of the
Electromagnetic Entity in Vacuo, Part V: The Production of Transverse
Fields and Energy by Scalar Interferometry," Journal of New Energy,
4(3), Special Issue, Winter 1999, p. 76-78.
We have
all been very much lied to about EM energy, also. Maxwell’s actual
theory is not taught in university, and never has been in any
electrical engineering courses. When you were told you were studying
Maxwell’s theory, you were being lied to.
To see
Maxwell’s original theory, courtesy of the ZPE website, simply
download the individual pages at these links (one page for each link):
http://www.zpenergy.com/downloads/Maxwell_1864_1.pdf
http://www.zpenergy.com/downloads/Maxwell_1864_2.pdf
http://www.zpenergy.com/downloads/Maxwell_1864_3.pdf
http://www.zpenergy.com/downloads/Maxwell_1864_4.pdf
http://www.zpenergy.com/downloads/Maxwell_1864_5.pdf
http://www.zpenergy.com/downloads/Maxwell_1864_6.pdf
http://www.zpenergy.com/downloads/Diagram.pdf
Any EM
transmitter you have radiating has, in addition to the accounted
divergent Poynting energy flow component you were taught, a giant
curled Heaviside energy flow component, unaccounted since Lorentz
(apparently at the bidding of the giant cartels) arbitrarily excluded
it from the watered-down Heaviside equations and theory in 1900. The
magnitude of that giant curled component (ironically discovered by
Heaviside, whose work was used to severely truncate Maxwell's theory
and work) accompanying every accounted Poynting component is more than
a trillion times the magnitude of the Poynting component.
In the
1880s and 1890s, Tesla was hell-bent on giving the world free energy
directly from the active medium (what today we would call the “active
vacuum” or “active spacetime itself”).
[Rigorous
proof that eliminating
the arbitrary Lorentz condition provides systems having free
additional energy currents from the vacuum is given by M. W. Evans et
al., “Classical Electrodynamics without the Lorentz Condition:
Extracting Energy from the Vacuum,” Physica Scripta, Vol. 61,
2000, p. 513 -517].
Quoting
Evans et al:
Vacuum charge and current appear
phenomenologically in the Lehnert equations but fundamentally in the
O(3) Yang-Mills theory of classical electrodynamics. The latter also
allows for the possibility of the existence of vacuum topological
magnetic charge density and topological magnetic current density.
Both O(3) and Lehnert equations are superior to the
Maxwell-Heaviside equations in being able to describe phenomena not
amenable to the latter. In theory, devices can be made to extract
the energy associated with vacuum charge and current.”
Obviously, from the cartels' view this intent by Tesla was totally
unacceptable! They thus began intensely suppressing Tesla, because
"that fool is intent on giving the world cheap clean electrical energy
for free, and one cannot put a power meter on that!” To the cartels,
it was unacceptable
that electrical engineers should be taught that every generator
already outputs a mix of two EM energy flows, one very tiny and usable
(divergent) and the other incredibly enormous though usually unusable
(usually nondivergent and noninteracting).
Accordingly, they apparently pressed Lorentz into service, to
eliminate all those asymmetrical systems that could not only exist in
an active medium, but could also receive and use excess energy from
it. In 1892 Lorentz arbitrarily symmetrized the already sharply
truncated Heaviside vector equations, thus removing the remaining and
“offending” asymmetric Maxwellian systems.
Of
course, Lorentz simply borrowed that work from his predecessor Ludwig
Lorenz, but it was H.A. Lorentz who received credit for it. Indeed,
Lorentz apparently received credit for the original work of several
persons! [For a discussion of who got credit for what, see J. D.
Jackson L. B. Okun, "Historical roots of gauge invariance," Reviews
of Modern Physics, Vol. 73, July 2001, p. 663-680. Discusses roots
and history of gauge invariance, verifies that Ludwig Lorenz (without
the “t”) first symmetrically regauged Maxwell's equations, although it
has been misattributed to H. A. Lorentz (with the “t”) as being first.
This is an excellent coverage of the history of who did what and when,
and who got credit for it.
In the
cartels' view back there in the 1880s and 1890s, electrical engineers
simply must not be taught
that every generator already
outputs more than a trillion times as much EM energy
flow as one inputs
to it in mechanical energy to crank the generator shaft! So they
called again on the services of their useful scientist Lorentz, who in
1892 had nicely symmetrized Heaviside's equations for them, so as to
arbitrarily discard all asymmetrical Maxwellian systems from the
theory -- the kind of system Tesla was trying to build that would
accept and extract excess usable energy from the active medium, and
thus could become "self-powering" like a windmill-driven power system,
a hydroelectric power plant, or a solar cell array powered generating
system.
To get
rid of the unacceptable Heaviside giant energy flow component as
desired by the cartels, Lorentz simply assumed a closed surface
surrounding every volume element of interest. He then
surface-integrated the entire energy flow vector (containing both the
giant curled nondiverging Heaviside energy flow component
and the feeble
diverging Poynting energy flow component), around that closed surface.
This eliminates (totally discards) that nondivergent giant Heaviside
vector component (at least in any special relativistic situation) and
retains the divergent Poynting energy flow component that enters the
circuit and powers up the electrons.
Recall
that the energy flow “in” an EM circuit or system occurs in space
outside the conductors, not inside the wires, and it does not involve
electron current. The two components of energy flow – the diverged
Poynting energy flow component and the Heaviside curled and
nondivergent energy flow component – both flow through space outside
the wire, and normally
only the Poynting component gets diverged into the conductors
to power the electrons.
Even in
today’s better textbooks, the Poynting energy flow
is not the true flow
of EM energy through a representative unit area in space. Even
Jackson points that out
(but does nothing about it). Quoting
Jackson:
"...the Poynting vector is arbitrary to the extent that the curl of
any vector field can be added to it. Such an added term can,
however, have no physical consequences. Hence it is customary to
make the specific choice …" [J. D. Jackson, Classical
Electrodynamics, Second Edition, Wiley, 1975, p. 237].
Note
that
Jackson uses precisely the
same argument (no physical significance) that Lorentz used, to justify
discarding any curled energy flow vector component.
Jackson's
statement is true only so long as the situation is special
relativistic (which is most of the time). In that case, the divergence
of the curl is zero and so Heaviside's curled flow component doesn’t
diverge or interact at all, and hence has "no consequence" at least
with respect to ordinary EM. But if the situation is made general
relativistic, then
Jackson's statement is not
valid. In that case, vector analysis fails and the divergence of the
curl can indeed be nonzero. So some of that giant Heaviside curled
energy flow component can be diverged and used.
The
"negative resonance absorption of the medium" (NRAM) process – used in
optical physics and proven experimentally since 1967 when the Russians
allowed Letokhov to release it –
will indeed diverge some of that
excess but long ignored Heaviside energy flow component.
Hence a self-resonant charged medium, fed (optimized experiment) by an
IR laser, will output re-radiate 18 times as much IR energy as one
calculates is input to it (using Poynting energy flow component input
only).
Because
the optical physicists know nothing about that huge ever-present
Heaviside curled energy flow component, they have no notion as to
where the excess input energy
(required by the conservation of energy law) could be coming from.
Hence they say "negative resonance absorption" instead of "excess
resonance emission", or they do not get their papers published! And
they never speak of the thermodynamics of the reaction; instead, they
speak only of the "change in the reaction cross section" of a
self-resonant charge, compared to the same charge when static.
So since
1967, we have been showing the Russians (and the KGB/FSB) that our
scientists still are unaware of the giant Heaviside energy flow
component, and still do not really understand what powers an EM
circuit. It isn't cranking the shaft of the generator!
In
short, we’re showing them that our scientists have still not corrected
the horribly flawed old Heaviside-Lorentz model taught in our
electrical engineering. Hence we still have not discovered the secret
of Soviet energetics – used for superweapons in the
Soviet Union since the late 1950s,
with weapons deployments beginning in April 1963.
But back
to the NRAM process. So the NRAM process in the IR is a
heat-amplification process freely receiving excess EM energy from
its active environment, and thus a process that outputs 18 times as
much energy as the operator inputs in his
Poynting energy flow input component.
He actually inputs the additional needed energy, in that
long-unaccounted giant Heaviside curled energy flow component
accompanying his input Poynting energy flow component. But the NRAM
self-oscillation process, tuned to the input frequency, is a general
relativistic process. Hence the optical physicists can and do diverge
additional input energy from that unknown Heaviside giant energy flow
component – but without knowing where on earth the excess input energy
is coming from!
My close colleague Ken Moore and I
prepared and obtained a U.S. Provisional Patent Application (fairly
crudely) describing how to modify and adapt the NRAM process for heat
amplification across a heat spectrum, not just across a very narrow
spectrum as output by an IR laser. We then put that PPA on
www.cheniere.org,
and freely gave it to the peoples of the world – in the hope that some
large organizations, foreign governments, etc. would adapt that
process and very quickly greatly alleviate the world energy crisis.
One can freely download that PPA at “Increasing the Coefficient of
Performance of Electromagnetic Power Systems by Extracting and Using
Excess EM Energy from the Heaviside Energy Flow Component”. PPA filed
and obtained in Oct. 2005. Now released into public domain and freely
given away. It is available
here.
Note that this has applications to
all steam boilers – which are used in the majority of standard
electrical power systems worldwide, including nuclear power plants.
With an adapted NRAM heat
amplifier of – say – COP = 4.0 placed in the slightly modified steam
boiler, along with a clamped positive feedback system for taking one
part of the output and feeding it back to the input – one can produce
a “self-powering” NRAM heat amplifier in that boiler, taking all its
input heat energy from the long unaccounted giant Heaviside curled
energy flow component.
Then once the steam boiler was
heated conventionally and up to speed in powering its steam
turbine-powered-generators, and thus powering the grid, the positive
feedback could be switched in and the steam boiler would become
self-powering. Thereafter all further consumption of fuel –
hydrocarbon or nuclear – could cease, and the steam boiler would
continue to power the generators and the electrical power grid.
By applying this worldwide, the
present tremendous and harmful emissions due to electrical power
plants could be dramatically and severely reduced. This also
dramatically reduces the addition of nuclear particles and material
into the atmosphere by coal-burning plants, a highly detrimental thing
often overlooked. Sadly, we are spending a great deal of money to try
to make a totally new kind of coal-burning plant that is much cleaner.
See Sean Captain, “Turning Black Coal Green.” Popular Science,
Feb. 2007, p. 27-29. Quoting:
“A radical new coal-burning power
plant aims to convert our dirtiest fossil fuel into clean-burning
hydrogen.” …”FuturGen is a $1 billion project sponsored by DoE in
partnership with 11 leading energy companies to build the first
near-zero-emission coal plant by 2012. The 275-megawatt facility
will serve as the model for a new generation of high-tech coal
facilities.”
And that is just for a single big
coal plant example. Think of the enormous costs of replacing most or
all of the present large number of coal-burning plants on earth!
And in the normal “clean system”
for burning coal, you merely trap the wastes containing all that
harmful nuclear material! You then have the problem of disposing of
that horrible mess – and the problem of nuclear waste disposal is not
yet solved, contrary to what is often portrayed.
To see that the nuclear wastes
problem is far from solved, see “Special Issue: Radioactive Waste,”
Physics Today Vol. 50(6), June 1997, p. 22–62. This collection
includes an overview by J. F. Ahearne; “Radioactive Waste: The Size of
the Problem,” J. F. Ahearne; “Nuclear Waste Disposal: The Technical
Challenges,” K. D. Crowley; “Hazards of Managing and Disposing of
Nuclear Waste,” W. E. Kastenberg and L. J. Gratton; “Unresolved
Problems of Radioactive Waste: Motivation for a New Paradigm,” D. W.
North; and “Nuclear Waste Management Worldwide,” C. McCombie. These
articles review the technical problems and risks of nuclear-waste
disposal, outline the reasons why the problem has not really been
resolved anywhere in the world, and suggest possible new approaches.
And for a quick assessment of the
CO2 emissions problem, we quote Deutch and Moniz:
“A modern 1000 megawatt coal plant
emits over 20,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide per day.” … Last
year, for example,
China reportedly
put about 80 gigawatts of coal-fired electricity generating capacity
on line – the rough equivalent to all the electricity capacity of
the
United Kingdom.
At present there is no indication the emerging economies will accept
the higher cost required to accommodate emission constraints because
of urgent competing infrastructure needs.”
[John Deutch and Ernest Moniz, “A Future for Fossil
Fuel.” Wall Street Journal, Thu. Mar. 15, 2007, p. A17].
Quoting Kintisch:
“Worldwide, the 5.4 billion tons of
coal burned each year generate roughly a third of the world’s carbon
dioxide emissions. But coal’s low cost compared to other energy
sources makes it irresistible to nations with plentiful deposits.”
[Eli Kintisch, “Report Backs More Projects to Sequester CO2 From
Coal.” Science, Vol. 315, 16 Mar. 2007, p. 1481].
And, unknown to most of the
public, a large coal-fired power plant produces more nuclear wastes
than a nuclear power plant. The coal-fired plant usually just emits
those radioactive particles, contained in the coal that is burned,
into the air. If you live near a large coal-fired electrical power
plant, you are exposed to more nuclear radiation than you would be
exposed to near a nuclear power plant of the same size output!
Everywhere one looks, the answer
to our energy problem is direct extraction of the electrical energy
from the seething universal vacuum – from spacetime itself. And yet
that problem is essentially not being even considered, much less
worked on.
As a truly great stopgap measure,
the development of NRAM heat amplifiers and clamped positive feedback
for self-powering, would allow capitalizing on the already incredible
sunk costs in our present electrical power systems having steam
boilers.
It can also be adroitly used to
very usefully augment a single windmill-powered generator into a horde
of steam-powered generators powering a large power grid. The same can
be done by using a small solar array powered electrical system to
“jump start” modified steam-boilers into self-powering.
It can also be used in accord with
a small dam and hydroelectric powered generator, to “jump start” the
necessary self-powering steam boilers that will then continuously
power a large electrical power grid.
The NRAM process could also be
modified on a smaller level for use in home and office heat pumps,
thus enabling self-powering systems, once they are jump-started. This
would also materially reduce the need for furnishing electrical power
to power our modern heat pumps!
If our
scientific community would unleash our sharp young doctoral
candidates, young post doctoral scientists, and a few sharp professors
and theoreticians on all this, then in two to three years there would
never again be an energy crisis, anywhere on Earth. But sadly, that is
simply not going to happen. The western scientific community -- with
respect to electrical power and the terrible mutilation and crippling
of Maxwell's theory -- are absolutely not going to allow such to be
done.
Presently we don't know of any paper offhand that points out the
interference capabilities (as in scalar interferometry) of that giant
Heaviside component. Let us put it this way: in any
special relativistic
situation, the divergence of that curled component is zero and it does
not interact at all. That is not true in a general relativistic
situation.
In a
general relativistic situation, some of that giant Heaviside curled
component can be forced to diverge after all, since vector analysis
fails and the divergence of the curl is not necessarily zero.
Any
practical way of building these scalar interferometry weapons has long
been highly classified by those nations that developed and use them.
We do
know, thanks to a very fine Australian researcher who had strong
Japanese contacts, that the Yakuza leased very powerful scalar
interferometers from the Russian KGB in latter 1989. The Aum Shinrikyo
also set up a university in the outskirts of
Moscow where the KGB
scientists trained Yakuza and Aum Shinrikyo scientists and engineers
in the theory of scalar interferometry and also in using such devices.
Since
early 1990, the weather engineering over
North America has been being done by
the Japanese Yakuza under direct KGB supervision, where the Yakuza
(assisted by Aum Shinrikyo) are acting as direct protégées of the KGB.
The engineering and steering of Hurricane Katrina, e.g., was done by
the Yakuza. That storm was particularly directed at the U.S. Gulf
Coast region, its oil, its oil drilling rigs, etc. It caused great
damage to them, to a refinery or so, many oil pipelines, and of course
to the populace,
New Orleans, etc. There
are still a great number of displaced Americans from that storm.
In
several of my books we also give incidents from the open literature of
the testing of giant scalar interferometry.
These
are the weapons that then-SecDef Cohen was referring to, when he
stated:
"Others are engaging
even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate,
set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of
electromagnetic waves… So there are plenty of ingenious minds out
there that are
at work finding ways in
which they can wreak terror upon other nations…It's
real, and that's the
reason why we have to intensify our efforts, and that's
why this is so important."
[Secretary of Defense William Cohen
at an April 1997
counterterrorism conference sponsored by former Senator
Sam Nunn. Quoted from DoD News Briefing, Secretary of Defense
William S. Cohen, Q&A
at the Conference on
Terrorism, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and
U.S. Strategy,
University of
Georgia,
Athens, Apr. 28, 1997].
To find
out how to build one of these scalar interferometers, unfortunately
you are strictly on your own. If I even looked like I was going to try
to build one, or collaborate with someone who was building one, an
immediate security clamp would be most firmly applied.
Other
than that, we suggest you take the Whittaker references we cite from
the hard literature as a starting point for understanding. But also
throw away your electrical engineering book: There are no EM force
fields in space, while you were taught that there is. There are also
no transverse EM force field waves in space, obviously, since EM force
fields exist only in charged matter. Feynman's three volumes of
sophomore physics, in 1964, even get at this fact.
Quoting
Nobelist Feynman:
"…in dealing with
force the tacit assumption is always made that the force is equal to
zero unless some physical body is present… One of the most important
characteristics of force is that it has a material origin…"
[Richard P. Feynman, Robert B. Leighton, and Matthew Sands, The
Feynman Lectures on Physics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, Vol.
1, 1964, p. 12-2].
"…the existence of
the positive charge, in some sense, distorts, or creates a
"condition" in space, so that when we put the negative charge in, it
feels a force. This potentiality for producing a force is
called an electric field." [Richard
P. Feynman, Robert B. Leighton, and Matthew Sands, The Feynman
Lectures on Physics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, Vol. 1, 1964, p.
2-4].
"We may think of E(x,
y, z, t) and B(x, y, z, t) as giving the forces that would be
experienced at the time t by a charge located at (x, y, z), with
the condition that placing the charge there did not disturb the
positions or motion of all the other charges responsible for the
fields." [ibid, vol. II, p. 1-3.]
Instead,
as pointed out by Tesla, there are
longitudinal
force-free EM fields in space, purely in the form of warping (curving
and torsioning) of spacetime itself.
In your
circuits, of course, you measure transverse EM force-field waves.
Since all force field waves exist in matter rather than space, those
must be transverse waves of matter (charged matter, since these are EM
force field transverse waves). Those are transverse EM waves in the
interacting Drude electron gas.
The spinning Drude electrons are quite constrained
longitudinally (they
move down the wire longitudinally only a few inches per hour, in a
typical circuit). But they are relatively free
laterally, so -- being
rotational and gyroscopic -- the electrons generate "transverse
electron gas force field waves" at right angles to the incoming
longitudinal EM waves from space.
Even in
your instruments, they almost always use Drude electron gas in their
operations. So inside the instrument itself, it transduces the input
longitudinal EM waves arriving from space, into
transverse electron precession waves
in the longitudinally-restrained Drude electron gas.
Call the
force-free condition of spacetime (which is how the EM field exists in
space) the PRECURSOR EM field. Then what we call an “EM force field”
(in charged matter) is the
ongoing interaction of the precursor EM field with that charged matter.
Here's
the point: Since there is no force in space, there is no nonzero F dot
ds, hence no nonzero integral of F dot ds. In other words, there is no
"work" or "power" (rate at which physical work is being done) going on
in pure space. Or in an ensemble of longitudinal EM waves in space.
Now
here's something often completely misunderstood, even by authors of
textbooks. Work is rigorously
defined as "the change of form of some energy". It is
not the "change
of magnitude of some energy", if the energy does not change form.
As an
example, changing the voltage V across a circuit or portion thereof
containing charges q, changes the collected energy W on those charges
q by the equation W = Vq. If no current flows during this change
(i.e., if dq/dt = 0), then one has a work-free “change of the
magnitude” of the collected energy on those charges q. Mere voltage
amplification is not work, nor does it involve work!
So one
way to do “free energy” is to momentarily pin the charges in a
receiving circuit, and during that pinned moment attach that circuit
to a static voltage source. The “static” voltage is nor really static,
since it consists of a bidirectional set of longitudinal EM waves, as
shown by Whittaker in 1903. So the voltage will of course flow onto
those pinned charges q, without doing any work at all. If one
multiplies the voltage by 10 during that process, one multiplies the
accumulated potential energy on those charges q by 10-fold. All “for
free”, without requiring work.
Then
switch away the static voltage source (it has not been drained in the
slightest, since no current flowed). Connect a diode and resistor in
parallel across that now-open region of the potentialized external
circuit, with the diode in the “usual flow direction of current”. Now
let the pinning of the electrons cease or run out, and – since
electrons can now flow – that circuit will freely produce current
through that resistor and freely dissipate real energy (real heat,
etc.) in it.
Get your
voltage amplification very high, and get your switching costs very
small. Bingo! You have just made a system which will continually take
lots of energy from a “static” source, and then dissipate it in a real
load (without dissipating in the original source’s back emf). You have
just made an “asymmetrical” Maxwellian circuit – of the kind discarded
so urgently by Lorentz in 1892. And in return for the useful work you
obtained in the resistor, you paid only a little work in the input for
the efficient switching.
You can
easily make a COP>1.0 electrical system in that fashion, proving the
point.
As you
can see from the pure definition of the precursor field, changing the
magnitude of the precursor engine is work-free, because the
form of the energy is
not changed.
Also
remember that, in mechanics, force is defined as change of momentum,
or F = d/dt(mv). Note that mass is a COMPONENT of force in that
definition. Now substitute m=0 in that equation, and F = 0. But that
need not change at all the precursor EM field (force-free) in space,
where m = 0 anyway.
Think
about that one for awhile. It's important.
But
after you make a gigantic precursor engine, then interacting that
already-formed precursor form of force-free energy with charged
matter, to provide force-field energy in and on charged matter,
represents a change of form of the input energy. So that system does
indeed produce work -- real physical work on those interacting
material charges.
And you
can use that principle to design and build your own COP>1.0 EM
systems.
So one
can build up very intense "patterns" (I call them "precursor
engines") of pure
precursor (force-free) EM fields in space, without any force or work
being required other than a tiny bit in the normal control and
switching of the unit so as to switch the directions of the fields.
Then, those very intense precursor engines can be interacted with mass
-- to give an enormous EM FORCE ENGINE involving very powerful forces
in that interacting charged matter.
This
ability to use precursor waves and precursor engines to produce force
field waves and force field engines in distant matter is what makes
scalar interferometry so unique and important in weaponry acting at a
distance.
Contrary
to present EM theory, it is also possible to produce precursor signals
and waves that are not limited by light speed. No force, no drag --
and hence the speed of light is not necessarily a limit. To even find
a lexicon for that, one has to look at quantum field theory and the
latest discoveries in quantum theory, during the last decade or so.
But it has been weaponized for some time.
Anyway,
that's about all I can tell you to help you. The things you are
trying to do, starting from scratch, are terribly difficult to do. In
those nations possessing these type weapons, very substantial programs
involving many, many scientists and very high classification have been
ongoing for decades.
For
examples of the weapons developed and their testing, see my book,
Oblivion: America at the Brink.
Best
wishes,
Tom
Bearden
Subject: Questions
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 08:55:15 -0400
I have a few questions for Dr. Bearden.
Thanks for forwarding them:
Dr. Bearden,
I have been reading your site now for a
while and have a few
questions regarding scalar
interferometry. I can think of several
potential commercial applications for
such devices and would like
some clarification on the concept of how
they work. Thank you for your time.
1) In one of your slide presentations,
you state,
"... the substructures themselves
interfere, and form energy in
the grid zones between
intersecting zero-lines.
In the perfect case, however, this
energy cannot radiate away.
It is physically created and
trapped as if in an 'energy bottle.'
We are CREATING this energy at a
distance..."
Later you go on to say,
"If I have a physical target in
that crossed zone, I can
literally 'fry' the target, for I
get all the power inputted to the
transmitters contained in the
bottle zone. I don't have any square law losses."
The first quote seems to say that
additional energy is created in
the interference zone beyond that which
is input by the
transmitters. While the second quote
indicates only a summation of
the power input by the transmitters. Can
you clarify this? For
example if I want to apply 50MW of power
to a target 200 miles away,
I would expect each transmitter to
supply 25MW each, or would a
lesser amount be required? I also
understand that the required power
is the same, regardless if the distance
is 200 miles or 200 ft.
2) Are the exothermic and endothermic
effects only due to reactions
with the atmosphere or local medium?
Would similar heating and
cooling occur in the vacuum of space?
3) While scalar waves can penetrate
Faraday shields, can they also
penetrate regions of ionized atmosphere
such as produced by Tesla
shields and the Aurora Borealis for
example?
4) Can you give a ballpark estimate of
the development effort
required to produce a laboratory
demonstrator device of modest power?
Thanks again for your time and effort in
making this information
known. If you choose to post this in the
correspondence section,
please do not publish my last name.
Sincerely,
Jonathan
