| Subject: RE: Videos's
transcript Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 15:26:40 -0500
Dear Jean and
Bernadette,
I don't have the
rights to any of those videos and therefore to any of their content. I
believe they are owned by Yin Gazda, whose whereabouts is unknown to me
at present. She filmed my small part in it here at my home.
Your best bet would be
to locate Yin Gazda (perhaps Jean-Louis Naudin may know where she is)
and get the permission from her. She holds the rights to the video and
its contents.
Attached is a very
nice article in French, by Marc Hermans, which I found on the Internet
in a document search about a month ago. You might wish to contact Marc
Hermans and obtain his permission to post the article on your site, or
you could put in a link to it. A simple google search should turn up
Marc Hermans and his website easily.
One cannot describe
the overunity EM power systems unless one uses a higher group symmetry
electrodynamics. The standard electrical engineering model taught in
university does not even model the proven active vacuum and its exchange
with the system, nor the broken symmetry of the source dipole in its
exchange with the vacuum. So electrical engineers (1) have no model that
includes those Maxwell systems far from equilibrium in their energetic
exchange with the vacuum, and (2) thus use a model which arbitrarily
excludes such permissible systems.
This means that there
is not now, nor has there ever been, a single electrical engineering
department, electrical engineering professor, or electrical engineering
textbook that even recognized and taught what actually powers every EM
circuit and every power line. The basis for that startling statement
has been proven in particle physics since 1957, and certified by the
Nobel Prize awarded to Lee and Yang for the discovery of broken symmetry
(such as the broken symmetry of the opposite charges on the ends of a
dipole). Generators and batteries do not power circuits; instead, they
make their own internal source dipole and nothing else. Once that
dipole is formed between the terminals, it will FREELY and CONTINUOUSLY
absorb unusable EM energy from the seething vacuum, transduce that
absorbed "virtual" energy into real EM energy, and pour out that EM
energy from the terminals (of the battery or generator) unceasingly, so
long as that dipole exists and is not destroyed.
That is rigorously
proven in particle physics. Electrical engineers and electrical
engineering departments don't even know it, and have not read the
physics literature. They do not even model the vacuum, much less the
dipole's broken symmetry in it. Their model is more than a century old,
and very seriously flawed. But continuing to use it guarantees that the
power meter stays on your house and your automobile keeps pumping gas,
and those huge power plants keep burning those hydrocarbons, damming
those rivers, building those big nuclear heaters (to make steam to run
the steam turbines that crank the shaft of the generators) called
nuclear power plants.
All the hydrocarbons
ever burned, nuclear fuel rods ever consumed, dams ever built, and
windmills ever built, have not directly added a single watt to the power
line. Never have, never will. All that does is allow the generator to
continually remake and restore the dipole, that our engineers
deliberately design the external circuit to destroy faster than it
powers the loads.
The problem is the
total and absolute failure of the scientific community to modernize
itself in electrical power technology and science.
COP>1.0 systems,
including self-powering systems, are indeed permissible in the original
1865 Maxwell theory and even in Heaviside's 1880's severe truncation of
it to a vector theory. However, such systems were then arbitrarily
excluded by Lorentz in the 1880s in order to get simpler equations that
could usually be solved without using numerical methods.
The arbitrary
discarding of COP>1.0 Maxwellian systems from the Maxwell-Heaviside
equations is done by (1) the standard arbitrary Lorentz regauging of the
MH equations (just to give new and simpler equations much easier to
solve), and (2) the use of the closed-current-loop circuit which
self-enforces that Lorentz condition and hence self-enforces COP<1.0.
That the scientific
community has not long ago recognized this and corrected it, is -- to
use Tesla's phrase -- "one of the most inexplicable aberrations of the
scientific mind that has ever been recorded in history." At first we
could excuse the leaders of the scientific community, but after more
than 100 years of such total ignorance it is no longer scientifically
excusable, but just plain stupid.
The problem lies in
the totally inadequate preparation of electrical engineers, their
professors, and the EE departments at university, by using an
electrodynamics model that is archaic, obsolete, and more than a
century old. It is also 45 years out of date with respect to what is
already discovered and proven in particle physics. There are far better
systems of higher group symmetry electrodynamics long since developed
and used in particle physics. The Maxwell-Heaviside-Lorentz model
breaks down there, because it does not adequately describe nature. In
fact, it is a purely material fluid flow model, still assuming a
material ether more than a century after the Michelson-Morley
experiments falsified that material ether.
Present electrical
engineering shows no signs of changing its archaic and incomplete EM
model, hence the continuing arbitrary exclusion of permissible
Maxwellian COP>1.0 systems which always were and are included in the
Maxwell-Heaviside theory prior to Lorentz's arbitrary regauging in the
1880s.
Simply ask an
electrical engineer what Lorentz regauging does with respect to the
systems now being described. He cannot even answer the question. The
regauging assumes that the system will change its potential energy twice
(which means it has to receive or give up energy to its environment, the
local vacuum), but only in such a carefully selected manner that the two
new and free force fields that appear are equal and opposite. Hence it
assumes the system designer will be so stupid that he will accept vacuum
energy in his system only by completely "locking it up" as additional
stress energy (a stress potential) so it can do no EXTERNAL work (that
requires a net force field) but only INTERNAL work to stress the
system. Further, this increase in energy from the vacuum in this
peculiar form, represents a rotation of the system itself away from the
laboratory frame. In other words, it assumes that the free vacuum
energy received and locked up is only used to rotate the system out of
the lab frame in a special relativistic manner.
The neat little thing
that the electrical engineers use to do all that "dirty work" is to
ubiquitously use the closed current loop circuit where all the spent
electrons in the external circuit are passed right back through the
source dipole inside the generator or battery. It is simple to show
that this then takes half the EM energy collected in the external
circuit, from the flow of energy poured out of the terminals by that
source dipole once made, and use it to directly destroy the source
dipole and cut off the free "EM energy from the vacuum" that is pouring
out of the terminals and filling space around the circuit. The other
half of the "caught" Poynting energy is used to power the losses and the
loads, which means less than half powers the loads. In turn, this means
that the stupid circuit destroys its own source dipole (and the free
flow of EM energy from the vacuum) faster than it can power its loads.
Hence that circuit self-enforces the Lorentz condition and COP<1.0.
Since it continuously
destroys the source dipole -- and hence its extraction and radiation of
EM energy freely from the vacuum --- this insane circuit and system
universally built by our power engineers guarantees the continuing
burning of those hydrocarbons, consumption of fuel rods, building of
dams to run hydroturbines to crank the generator shaft, building of
windmills to crank the generator shaft, etc. --- all to do nothing but
to continuously restore the source dipoles that our own engineers
fiendishly design the power system to destroy faster than it powers the
load.
That is what our great
scientific groups, academies, and leaders have foisted upon us for more
than a century. That is what is polluting and destroying the planet,
increasing global warming, destroying species, and killing lots of
people every year by the pollution of their lungs and air, and the
poisoning of their environment.
The environmentalists
are asleep, because they turn to the same scientific community that has
created this monster of a problem, for their scientific advice on how to
solve it! Those responsible for the problem, and continuing to be
responsible for it, are never going to be responsible for the solution!
Sadly, most electrical
engineers have never even read the original literature, to see how their
science and model were sharply curtailed by purely arbitrary decision.
Most have no idea what changes to a system are represented by Lorentz
regauging, and most never even thought about it. Most have absolutely
no notion of the difference between Heaviside's energy flow theory and
Poynting's theory, or that Poynting assumed from the beginning only that
small amount of the available giant energy flow, surrounding ever
circuit, that gets intercepted and captured by the circuit and used to
power loads (and destroy dipoles). None of them are aware that the
remaining Heaviside energy flow component that is just wasted, is often
10exp13 times as great in magnitude as the silly little Poynting
component that gets captured and enters the circuit and is used.
There again, no one in
the 1880s had the foggiest notion of where on earth such a startling
amount of energy pouring from the terminals of every generator and
battery could possibly be coming from. The electron, atom, and nucleus
had not been discovered, and particle physics was largely unborn.
Special and general relativity, quantum mechanics, and quantum
electrodynamics did not yet exist. So there was no knowledge of the
seething and active vacuum, or its energetic interaction with every
charge. A "charge" was nothing but a "piece of electric fluid", and the
EM theory was a purely material fluid flow theory.
Nobel Prize winners
such as Feynman, and great physicists such as Wheeler, have pointed out
the strange inadequacies and errors in the foundations of that hoary old
electrodynamics. Little attention has been paid, and even today the
National Academy of Sciences and the National Science Foundations flatly
do not recognize that the greatest barrier to scientific progress is
indeed those terrible errors and shortcomings in the classical EM
theory. They have absolutely no program to correct it. They have
thereby failed the nation in a serious way, since several foreign
nations have indeed secretly corrected those flaws, gone to much better
systems of electrodynamics, and designed and deployed (and even
occasionally used) weapons that our own scientists cannot and do not
even recognize or understand.
We pay the electric
power company not for its scientific and technical ability, but for it
to have a giant sumo wrestling match inside its generators and lose, so
the power companies can continue supporting the great energy barons by
their ever increasing thirst for hydrocarbons, nuclear fuel cells, etc.
Far better systems of
electrodynamics have been developed and used in particle physics for
some time. The proof that the broken symmetry of the source dipole
extracts from the vacuum all the EM energy used in a circuit, has been
in particle physics for 45 years. Sadly, the EEs still don't know it,
and still do not understand just what the broken symmetry of the dipole
means in their circuits.
Best wishes,
Tom Bearden
Dear Mr
Bearden
First,
many thanks ! we were not waiting for any answer from you so we are very
honoured for your so quick and interesting answer.
We don't
want to bother you with additional mails but would you look at this one
?
Could
you allow us to release on our website the whole faithfull french
transcript of your interventions from the 3 videos
TF1 Entreprises EDV 54, (1992) Royal
Atlantis Film Gmbh by Yin Gazda (our transcript is in the
attached document)
Why are
we asking you for that ?
Because,
here, in France, owing to these videos, many persons had shown some
interest for free energy and specially for your work. And now, these 3
videos are exhausted (already since 1998)
Nine or
ten years ago, we had made this transcript. Further, meeting Jean-Louis,
we have known that he also did it - what a stroke of luck…!
Hence,
we think that this document is certainly useful for the french readers
to have, through our webpages, the chance to get this important text (as
we think so).
It is
particularly important at the present time with the MEG patent's news !
We want
to include some pictures to illustrate this 15 pages text (or less if
not illustrated), so would you also give us your authorization to
include 2 pictures from your website ?
tom-30Sep01-2b
final-priore-1-17a
Awaiting
your reply, yours sincerely.
Jean et
Bernadette Soarès PS : would you excuse us for some remaining mistakes in this mail
Cordialement |