Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 16:39:01
-0600
We are still seeking
to obtain the necessary funding to finish the development of the MEG.
From time to time, I post the status of it on my website,
www.cheniere.org.
Once we have a funding
partner, we will set up the necessary lab to finish the project and
produce pre-production scaled up units. Our first effort will be aimed
at a 2.5 KW unit, with synchronizer for use of up to 6 units together.
That will fulfill the marked from 2.5 KW to 16 KW.
Strong work will be
done toward making the unit self-powering (which it is not, at present).
We think that can be completed not too long after the first production
units are produced.
Later we will increase
the basic unit to, say, 10 KW with synchronizer, for from 10 to 60 KW
applications.
Eventually we will
design and produce single, more powerful units for powering automobiles
and other such applications. But first, it's one thing at a time, step
by step. Provision of the necessary lab and specialist team is required
first, and that is what is more expensive than we ourselves can fund.
Hence the necessity for a major funding partner.
There is still a
rather formidable research and development program to go from the small
successful lab experiments we have at present to full-bore scaled up
power units. Such units are highly nonlinear, and they involve several
unusual areas of physics, including geometric phase (as in the
Aharonov-Bohm effect, used in the device, nonlinear oscillation theory,
nonlinear oscillation control theory, and higher group symmetry modeling
in unified field theory (one must model the supersystem, including the
system, the active vacuum, and the local curvatures of spacetime).
Contrary to popular opinion of so many "instant experts", it is not an
electrical engineering task!
The classical
Maxwell-Heaviside EM model and electrical engineering, for example,
assume an inert vacuum and a flat local spacetime, both assumptions
being false. Since an active vacuum and curved local spacetime are
involved, obviously one has to have a much better EM model; such are
indeed available. The standard electrical engineering model, e.g.,
implicitly assumes (completely erroneously) that every EM field, EM
potential, and joule of EM energy in the universe is and has been
created out of nothing at all, by their associated source charges. Some
decades ago that problem was very reluctantly admitted, but then it was
very determinedly scrubbed out of the textbooks and is almost never
mentioned today. Today, few if any EEs or EE professors even realize
that the model they utilize means that they already subscribe to the
creation of energy from nothing, in violation of the conservation of
energy law, and on a scale unparalleled in human history. One must keep
one's sense of humor when one reads criticism from such folks assailing
COP>1.0 EM systems as "dirty old forbidden perpetual motion" and the
researchers as lunatics or worse. So in electrical engineering, "energy
from the vacuum" is an almost forbidden phrase, even though every joule
of EM field energy and potential energy in the external circuit comes
from the source charges in that circuit, by the EE model. Yet in
particle physics, the interaction of the vacuum energy is widely
utilized. As an example, it generates all forces of nature (including
all the forces the EE's use). The energetic exchange between the vacuum
and charges is well-known in particle physics, particularly since 1957,
the proof of broken symmetry, and the prompt award of the Nobel Prize to
Lee and Yang for having predicted it.
Electrical engineering
is incapable of even modeling
an "energy from the vacuum" system, since it does not model the active
vacuum, much less an asymmetry in the interaction of that active vacuum
with the system (with the source charges in the system). So for proper
theoretical modeling, one must use a higher group symmetry EM model,
such as SU(2)XSU(2) or O(3) electrodynamics. Such electrodynamics
models are available and utilized in particle physics. But since this
is a new area not already in the handbooks, one has to do a great number
of phenomenology experiments and buildups, varying parameters
methodically, while slowly developing and fitting a nonlinear, higher
group symmetry EM mathematical model to the results. Once that has been
accomplished to a reasonable degree and such a preliminary mathematical
engineering model is available, scaled-up units can be designed and
tackled in earnest and completed fairly readily, providing the first
larger pre-production prototypes (that 2.5 KW unit) and followed by
prototypes of increased size (that 10 KW unit). Application of
production engineering itself poses no problems, since no unusual
production techniques are involved except for special materials, and
those can be independently purchased to order and incorporated.
We also know of
several other legitimate COP>1.0 systems ready for such final research
and development. Two of them are by close colleagues, and it may be
that one or more of those systems will also make it into final R&D and
then production and marketing, as soon as the MEG or even sooner. We
certainly hope so; any power system that succeeds in doing it will
"break the barrier" for all other legitimate researchers.
Best wishes,
Tom Bearden |