Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004
17:42:23 -0600 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.5390 M:100.0000 C:97.9651 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <soliton@bellsouth.net> [206/10]
Thanks Chris!
I am not familiar with the
405 Hz phenomenon you gave. If "physical" resonance due to size, etc.
can be ruled out, then it might be a real anomaly. But unfortunately I
have no inkling of what it might represent.
Unfortunately, today --
unless one has tons of money, is a noted publications house, etc. --
one would never get the permissions etc. necessary to publish a series
of documents with all those references. So I don't know anyway that a
private individual can even hope to accomplish something like that.
Hopefully, some day it will be done.
Also, I've not found any
way to get the large scientific organizations to even look at as
simple a thing as clearly examining and stating what the built-in
foundations assumptions are of the various major models being used in
physics and engineering. I know of no classical Maxwell-Heaviside text
that even discusses the assumptions or lists them, nor do I know of
any electrical engineering text that does. I would be delighted, of
course, to find one, and perhaps some other reader may have done so.
So we just continue to
list and show and reference everything we can on the website, in
publications, etc. Eventually we hope that this will reach enough
interested young graduate students and post doctoral scientists that
gradually the "models" start being subjected to the foundations
assumptions analyses so desperately needed.
Some of the glaringly
wrong assumptions still in the Classical Maxwell-Heaviside
electrodynamics model and in the electrical engineering model are
given in my paper, "Precursor Engineering:..." which can be downloaded
from the website.
Now if some enterprising
young scientist would just do a treatise on the thermodnamics of
regauging, and the thermodynamic implications of the gauge freedom
axiom, it would fill a very deep need!
And you are quite correct
about the rapidly escalating rise in the demand for energy, due
to emerging nations, population growth, etc. Quite frankly, unless we
do develop cheap, clean energy systems extracting their energy from
the vacuum, the dire consequences to the biosphere (and to humanity
and other species) is almost certain to occur. The only debate is how
soon. But what once was forecast for the 2050s or so, is now looking
more like 2010 or 2015 at the latest.
Best wishes,
Tom Bearden
|