Sent:
Tuesday, March 18, 2008 4:19 PM To:
Correspondent Subject:
Simple Production of A Self-Powering Permanent Magnet Motor In
electrical systems, the term “back emf” actually refers to the equal and
opposite force field accompanying the “forward emf”, in any
“symmetrical”
electrical system. In magnetic
systems, the corresponding term is “forward and back mmf”, rather than
“forward and back emf”. With the
symmetrization of the EE model by Lorentz in 1892, just at the very
beginning of electrical engineering, our electrical engineers have been
trained to think, design, build, and deploy only symmetrical systems.
Lorentz (at the bidding of J. P. Morgan) eliminated all remaining
asymmetrical Maxwellian systems in the already sharply curtailed Heaviside
equations, further limiting the already severely-limited Heaviside model
and thus the electromagnetic science and technology that later grew up to
be based on it. With the
symmetrization of the Heaviside equations, those
arbitrarily symmetrical
equations became the present “electrical engineering” model, usually
taught (falsely) as if they were Maxwell’s original theory. Maxwell’s
theory contains 20 quaternion-like equations in 20 unknowns, and contains
both symmetrical and asymmetrical systems. You can develop and build all
sorts of asymmetrical systems with Maxwell’s original theory, that cannot
be built in accord with the symmetrized Heaviside theory now loosely
referred to as “Maxwell’s theory”.
All
rotating motors actually turn themselves from the broken symmetry that is
created inside them. The present engineers have been trained that they
must pay to put extra energy into the system, just to break its symmetry.
That of course is totally false. Otherwise, a rotating electron (with its
continual spin) would not spin. To
reiterate: In order to achieve self-rotation of a magnetic motor, one must
produce broken symmetry (asymmetry) in that otherwise symmetrical system. When we use
laterally-symmetric bar magnets, which presently is essentially all that
the industry makes, the field strength on the left side of each magnet is
equal to its field strength on its right side.
So when I
have a stator N and a rotor S facing it, using such
“laterally symmetrical
forces”, then in the forward mmf region (where the rotor S is approaching
the stator N) the rotor pole is being
accelerated by the
attractive force from the stator rotor pole in the forward mmf region, and
so is having free angular momentum
being generated and stored in excess in the flywheel and shaft. That's
real energy (specifically, energy x time).
But when
the rotor magnetic pole passes the stator magnetic pole, the direction of
the mutual attraction force is now reversed (this is the
back mmf region),
and so the rotor is decelerating and thereby decelerating the previously
accelerated shaft and flywheel. If the magnetic fields of each magnet are
laterally symmetric, and nothing else is done, then in the back mmf region
the system will freely take back (decelerate) all the excess energy freely
stored in the accelerated flywheel and shaft in the previous forward mmf
region. So the
net force of this symmetrical
arrangement is zero, and the net
angular momentum generated and stored in the flywheel and shaft is also
zero. In its back mmf (decelerating) region, the symmetrical permanent
magnet motor system takes back all the free energy it stored in its
earlier forward mmf (accelerating) region. So that
silly thing will not give us any self-rotation and free energy, because of
that lateral field strength symmetry of the bar magnets used as stator and
rotor magnets. In a
normal motor, we are
trained to put in a coil (say, there in the back mmf region) and then
we pay to put in a
sudden surge of EM energy to that coil, so that it momentarily overrides
(cancels) the back mmf force. In short, we momentarily make the system
asymmetrical, so that
its net back mmf is
less than its forward
mmf. That means that now the motor retains at least some of its excess
acceleration and excess angular momentum added to the flywheel and shaft
in its previous acceleration (forward mmf) zone, but
we are “paying” to have this occur.
Anyway, once that broken symmetry
between forward and back mmfs is there, with the back mmf deliberately
reduced to less than the forward mmf, the motor will self-rotate because
of its own system asymmetry. And so we
can add a “drag load” to the shaft, to soak up all that excess energy
gained in each rotation, to do work to power the load. In that case, the motor
rotates continuously, furnishing energy and power to power the load
continuously. But it does not do it “for free”, because we are paying for
that broken symmetry all the time. We are
paying to break the symmetry, nothing else. Now let us
reason together. Nature and this system do not care
how we get that broken
symmetry. If we wish to continually "pay" for it, and thus be tied to
consuming fuel to get our "payment" energy for breaking the symmetry, we
can do so.
And that is
precisely what everybody is and has been trained to do – ever since J. P.
Morgan had Lorentz symmetrize the EE model itself, so our engineers would
build only symmetrical
systems. In that case, they will always have to
pay to make the required
broken symmetry, and that keeps the world firmly tied to its energy crisis
and its escalating economical problems. But now
suppose we contract with some nanocrystalline folks, to build a special
"laterally asymmetrical" permanent magnet. They will lay down the plane of
crystals for the side edge, with full magnetic field at the beginning
layer (say, on the left), then lay an adjacent plane to the right but with
a slightly weaker magnetic field, and they continue laying layers to the
right with successively weaker
fields. The result
is a permanent magnet (bar magnet) with
asymmetric field strengths
laterally. Suppose we
get two of those laterally asymmetric bar magnets, and use them with a
rotor and stator and shaft to make a self-rotating motor. Suppose we mount the rotor (say, S-pole facing the stator) and stator
(say, N-pole facing the rotor) so that, when the rotor S pole is rotating
and approaching the stator N pole, the strong sides of both bar magnets
are facing each other. This gives a certain acceleration added to the
flywheel and shaft, and it stores up a certain amount of free angular
momentum in the rotor and flywheel, while the rotor is traversing through
that “forward mmf” zone Then as the
rotor magnetic S pole passes the stator magnetic N pole and enters the
back mmf zone of the system, the weaker sides of the magnets are now
facing. So the deceleration
in this back mmf zone is less than the
incoming acceleration was
(in the forward mmf zone).
And that
silly thing will sit there and self-rotate, till the end of time if
nothing else bothers it or affects it, and so long as nothing breaks. And
it will try to continually accelerate the flywheel and shaft with a
net acceleration during
each rotation. This means
I can now add a matched “drag (decelerating)” load to the accelerated
shaft, and use all that extra stored energy from each rotational cycle, to
freely power my load. And if I
match the load drag and the available “free asymmetry energy” net
acceleration, that silly beast will sit there and self-rotate and power
its load till
the end of time, if nothing else intervenes. And now we
do not have to pay anything for breaking the symmetry, after the initial
costs of the laterally asymmetric magnets and assembling the system are
paid! Magnetic
motors are powered by their broken symmetry,
not by what breaks the original
symmetry. We
ourselves can continually pay to continually break the symmetry if we
wish, or we can just build the system asymmetrically in the first place.
Nature doesn’t care. Note that,
once the nanocrystalline folks have done their number to develop the
laterally-asymmetry bar magnets, then such permanent magnets with
laterally asymmetric field strengths can be put into production for not
too much more than the cost of normal symmetric magnets. And at that
point, anyone in the world can order some laterally-asymmetric permanent
magnets, and easily assemble his own self-rotating motor and thus his own
self-powering system. Hope this
helps! This is precisely what I was speaking about in the
“solutions”
paper. Will be drawing it out in drawings soon, to show exactly how it
works. Heck, you can even have someone put it on a simulator, and the
simulator will show you that it will self-rotate and self-power its load. Best
wishes, Tom
|